{"title":"Der Berliner Kunstmarkt: An Analysis of the Berlin Art Market, 1930–1945","authors":"Caroline Frank, Jason S. Kaplan","doi":"10.1086/700112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors investigate Berlin’s art auction market as it developed between 1930 and 1945. By analyzing Berlin’s auction data from the Getty Research Institute’s recently published database of German auction sales catalogs dating from 1930 to 1945, this paper explores the Third Reich’s influence on the Berlin fine art auction market. The analysis is separated into two main categories: the overall market and the auction houses, in particular a close examination of the auction houses Graupe and Lange. Key findings include the inverse relationship between median selling price and the number of paintings sold over several years, indicating that paintings sold in Berlin during this time functioned more like normal goods rather than luxury items; the interconnected relationship between the ownership and operations of many auction houses, including Graupe’s transition to Lange after fleeing from anti-Semitism in Berlin; and the evidence that stolen artwork was auctioned for sale on several occasions, with most of the proceeds benefitting Hitler’s Nazi regime. [This article is a revision of the paper that won the 2018 Sotheby’s Institute of Art Research Award. The award recognizes excellence in a student paper or digital art history project on a topic relevant to collecting or the art market. This paper was presented as part of the “New Voices in the Profession” panel at the ARLIS/NA conference held in New York, New York, in February 2018.]","PeriodicalId":43009,"journal":{"name":"Art Documentation","volume":"107 1","pages":"141 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/700112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The authors investigate Berlin’s art auction market as it developed between 1930 and 1945. By analyzing Berlin’s auction data from the Getty Research Institute’s recently published database of German auction sales catalogs dating from 1930 to 1945, this paper explores the Third Reich’s influence on the Berlin fine art auction market. The analysis is separated into two main categories: the overall market and the auction houses, in particular a close examination of the auction houses Graupe and Lange. Key findings include the inverse relationship between median selling price and the number of paintings sold over several years, indicating that paintings sold in Berlin during this time functioned more like normal goods rather than luxury items; the interconnected relationship between the ownership and operations of many auction houses, including Graupe’s transition to Lange after fleeing from anti-Semitism in Berlin; and the evidence that stolen artwork was auctioned for sale on several occasions, with most of the proceeds benefitting Hitler’s Nazi regime. [This article is a revision of the paper that won the 2018 Sotheby’s Institute of Art Research Award. The award recognizes excellence in a student paper or digital art history project on a topic relevant to collecting or the art market. This paper was presented as part of the “New Voices in the Profession” panel at the ARLIS/NA conference held in New York, New York, in February 2018.]
作者调查了1930年至1945年间柏林艺术品拍卖市场的发展。本文通过分析盖蒂研究所(Getty Research Institute)最近公布的1930年至1945年德国拍卖目录数据库中的柏林拍卖数据,探讨了第三帝国对柏林艺术品拍卖市场的影响。分析主要分为两大类:整体市场和拍卖行,特别是对Graupe和Lange拍卖行的仔细研究。主要发现包括,几年来,售价中位数与画作销量呈反比关系,表明这段时间在柏林出售的画作更像是普通商品,而不是奢侈品;许多拍卖行的所有权和运营之间相互关联的关系,包括格鲁普(Graupe)在逃离柏林的反犹太主义后转投朗格(Lange);还有证据表明,被盗艺术品被拍卖了好几次,大部分收益都让希特勒的纳粹政权受益。[本文为2018年苏富比艺术研究院研究奖论文改版]该奖项旨在表彰与收藏或艺术市场相关主题的学生论文或数字艺术史项目的卓越表现。本文作为2018年2月在美国纽约举行的ARLIS/NA会议上的“专业新声音”小组的一部分发表。