019 The COLIPA Standard for solar simulators failed to standardize sunscreen SPFS

R. Sayre
{"title":"019 The COLIPA Standard for solar simulators failed to standardize sunscreen SPFS","authors":"R. Sayre","doi":"10.1034/J.1600-0781.2002.180208_19.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COLIPA Standard for solar simulators was developed to insure that SPF tested in different laboratories was not different because of the solar simulator used. Indeed for products with lower SPFs 2-10, the solar simulator standard reasonably assures similar SPFs when tested in different laboratories. For products with SPFs greater than 15, the SPF for the same product could be tested at 15 in one laboratory but as an SPF 100 in another. \n \n \n \nDifferences in SPF due to solar simulator filtration will occur only for sunscreen products that exhibit absorption like cut-off filters. Products which generally absorb all UV wavelengths equally will not exhibit differences in SPF due to solar simulator filtration. \n \n \n \nIn addition because of different amounts of UVA allowed within the COLIPA standard, the actual response for a given exposure may in one laboratory produce persistent pigment darkening and in another a simple sunburn. Ways to correct this flaw will be examined.","PeriodicalId":20104,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology, Photoimmunology and Photomedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology, Photoimmunology and Photomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0781.2002.180208_19.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COLIPA Standard for solar simulators was developed to insure that SPF tested in different laboratories was not different because of the solar simulator used. Indeed for products with lower SPFs 2-10, the solar simulator standard reasonably assures similar SPFs when tested in different laboratories. For products with SPFs greater than 15, the SPF for the same product could be tested at 15 in one laboratory but as an SPF 100 in another. Differences in SPF due to solar simulator filtration will occur only for sunscreen products that exhibit absorption like cut-off filters. Products which generally absorb all UV wavelengths equally will not exhibit differences in SPF due to solar simulator filtration. In addition because of different amounts of UVA allowed within the COLIPA standard, the actual response for a given exposure may in one laboratory produce persistent pigment darkening and in another a simple sunburn. Ways to correct this flaw will be examined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
019太阳模拟器的COLIPA标准未能标准化防晒霜的spf值
制定COLIPA太阳模拟器标准是为了确保在不同实验室测试的SPF不会因使用的太阳模拟器而不同。事实上,对于spf值较低的产品,太阳模拟器标准合理地保证了在不同实验室测试时类似的spf值。对于SPF值大于15的产品,同一产品可能在一个实验室测试SPF值为15,而在另一个实验室测试SPF值为100。由于太阳模拟器过滤而导致的SPF差异只会发生在具有截止过滤器等吸收特性的防晒霜产品上。通常吸收所有紫外线波长相等的产品不会因太阳模拟器过滤而出现SPF差异。此外,由于在COLIPA标准内允许的UVA量不同,在一个实验室中,特定暴露的实际反应可能会产生持久的色素变黑,而在另一个实验室中则会产生简单的晒伤。将研究纠正这一缺陷的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Photodermatology, edited by James Ferguson and Jeffrey S. Dover Photobiology for the 21st Century.Thomas Coohill and Dennis Valenzeno (eds) 022 308 excimer laser treatment of psoriasis 010 Late onset congenital erythropoietic porphyria (Günther's disease) 009 Skin aging and photoaging effects can be quantified in vivo by fluoresence excitation spectroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1