Contesting the framing of bioeconomy policy in Germany: the NGO perspective

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning Pub Date : 2022-05-03 DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2022.2071689
Lena Riemann, Alexandru Giurca, D. Kleinschmit
{"title":"Contesting the framing of bioeconomy policy in Germany: the NGO perspective","authors":"Lena Riemann, Alexandru Giurca, D. Kleinschmit","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2071689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Civil society has so far been little involved in bioeconomy discussions. In 2019, German non-governmental organizations (NGOs) concerted their criticism towards the bioeconomy policy in Germany in two joint statements. Assuming that such developments may further polarize the societal debate on bioeconomy, we set out to understand the NGOs’ criticism, as well as their framing of bioeconomy as opposed to the bioeconomy understanding at the federal level. We find that in many cases the bioeconomy frames emerging from policy documents differ substantially from those of NGOs. Despite lacking a common bioeconomy vision, NGOs agree on the same existing set of problems which are mainly related to the neoliberal (green) growth narrative advocated in federal policy documents. Drawing on deliberative governance concepts, we discuss ways how both NGOs and policymakers can bring bioeconomy into the contemporary public debate and thus allow for different, and perhaps more diverse interpretations of the bioeconomy.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"81 1","pages":"822 - 838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2071689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Civil society has so far been little involved in bioeconomy discussions. In 2019, German non-governmental organizations (NGOs) concerted their criticism towards the bioeconomy policy in Germany in two joint statements. Assuming that such developments may further polarize the societal debate on bioeconomy, we set out to understand the NGOs’ criticism, as well as their framing of bioeconomy as opposed to the bioeconomy understanding at the federal level. We find that in many cases the bioeconomy frames emerging from policy documents differ substantially from those of NGOs. Despite lacking a common bioeconomy vision, NGOs agree on the same existing set of problems which are mainly related to the neoliberal (green) growth narrative advocated in federal policy documents. Drawing on deliberative governance concepts, we discuss ways how both NGOs and policymakers can bring bioeconomy into the contemporary public debate and thus allow for different, and perhaps more diverse interpretations of the bioeconomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对德国生物经济政策框架的质疑:非政府组织视角
迄今为止,民间社会很少参与生物经济的讨论。2019年,德国非政府组织(ngo)在两份联合声明中对德国的生物经济政策提出了批评。假设这样的发展可能会使社会对生物经济的争论进一步两极分化,我们开始理解非政府组织的批评,以及他们对生物经济的框架,而不是联邦层面的生物经济理解。我们发现,在许多情况下,政策文件中出现的生物经济框架与非政府组织的框架存在很大差异。尽管缺乏共同的生物经济愿景,但非政府组织对同样存在的一系列问题达成了一致,这些问题主要与联邦政策文件中倡导的新自由主义(绿色)增长叙事有关。根据协商治理的概念,我们讨论了非政府组织和政策制定者如何将生物经济纳入当代公共辩论,从而允许对生物经济进行不同的,也许是更多样化的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Chiefs and floods: hybrid governance and co-production of flood risk adaptation in Tamale, Ghana. City-to-city learning: a synthesis and research agenda The nested hierarchy of urban vulnerability within land use policies fails to address climate injustices in Turkey Does multidimensional distance matter? Perceptions and acceptance of wind power Exploring the potential of city networks for climate: the case of urbact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1