Simulating the Cognitive Leap Using Brainwriting

J. Langham, Neil Paulsen
{"title":"Simulating the Cognitive Leap Using Brainwriting","authors":"J. Langham, Neil Paulsen","doi":"10.1111/DMJ.12062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Idea generation and ‘brainstorming’ is most effective when conducted in groups and in person. However, in-person co-creation activities have many limitations. The digital environment provides opportunities to ideate remotely and to enhance creativity. We designed an online experiment to assess the impact of brainwriting on the effectiveness of ideation. Our intention was to determine if remote digital brainstorming could improve ideation, harnessing diversity in experience and knowledge whilst problem solving. Results revealed that unusual and novel ideas occurred in approximately 53% of cases using our simulated environment. Compared to the pre-session control activity, ideas generated were more sophisticated and included improvement in all cases. Our experiment demonstrates that digital brainwriting can significantly improve the quality and quantity of new ideas.","PeriodicalId":100367,"journal":{"name":"Design Management Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/DMJ.12062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Idea generation and ‘brainstorming’ is most effective when conducted in groups and in person. However, in-person co-creation activities have many limitations. The digital environment provides opportunities to ideate remotely and to enhance creativity. We designed an online experiment to assess the impact of brainwriting on the effectiveness of ideation. Our intention was to determine if remote digital brainstorming could improve ideation, harnessing diversity in experience and knowledge whilst problem solving. Results revealed that unusual and novel ideas occurred in approximately 53% of cases using our simulated environment. Compared to the pre-session control activity, ideas generated were more sophisticated and included improvement in all cases. Our experiment demonstrates that digital brainwriting can significantly improve the quality and quantity of new ideas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用大脑写作模拟认知飞跃
想法的产生和“头脑风暴”在团队和面对面进行时是最有效的。然而,面对面的共同创造活动有许多局限性。数字环境提供了远程构思和增强创造力的机会。我们设计了一个在线实验来评估大脑写作对创意有效性的影响。我们的目的是确定远程数字头脑风暴是否可以改善创意,在解决问题的同时利用经验和知识的多样性。结果显示,在我们的模拟环境中,大约53%的情况下出现了不寻常和新颖的想法。与会前的控制活动相比,产生的想法更复杂,在所有情况下都有改进。我们的实验表明,数字大脑写作可以显著提高新想法的质量和数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Design Thinking and AI: A New Frontier for Designing Human-Centered AI Solutions From the President Designing Systems in a Fine-Grained and Inclusive Way, by Integrating Service Design within Futures Studies and Foresight Using Theory of Change to Support Participatory Visual Mapping in Urban Transformation Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1