Women’s traumatic childbirth experiences: Reflections and implications for practice

F. Yvonne
{"title":"Women’s traumatic childbirth experiences: Reflections and implications for practice","authors":"F. Yvonne","doi":"10.33118/OAJ.PREG.2019.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to explore women’s traumatic childbirth experiences in order to make maternity care professionals more aware of women’s intrapartum care needs to prevent traumatic experiences.\n\nMethods: A qualitative exploratory study with a constant comparison/ grounded theory design was performed. Thirty-six interviews were conducted with women who had given birth in a Dutch birth setting.\n\nFindings: Four themes, playing a profound role in the occurrence of traumatic birth experiences, emerged:\n\n1 Midwife-LED care – Maternity care professionals’ unilateral decision making during intrapartum care.\n\n2. Alienation – Women’s experiences of feeling distant and estranged from the childbirth event and the experience.\n\n3. Situatedness – The difference of the impact of interventions in situations when complications or emergencies are present in contrast to when interventions are performed without an emergency reason.\n\n4. Discrepancies - Paradoxes between expectations (ought self) and reality (actual self) - on an interpersonal (woman) and intrapersonal (woman-midwife) level.\n\nImplications for practice: Intrapartum care needs to include informed-consent and shared-decision making. Practitioners need to continuously evaluate if the woman is consistently part of her own childbearing process. Practitioners need to provide personalised care, make an effort to explain (emergency) situations, be conscious of their non-verbal communication and maintain an ongoing dialogue with the woman.\n\nConclusion: Intrapartum care can be adapted, adopting a woman-centred approach, in order to prevent women’s traumatic childbirth experiences. This study can serve as a valuable assistance for maternity services, midwifery practice, research and for developing guidance in the field of midwifery practitioners’ education.\n\nKeywords: Traumatic birth experience, Maternity care, Intrapartum care, Informed-consent, Shared-decision making, Woman-centred care, Qualitative research.","PeriodicalId":93345,"journal":{"name":"OA journal of pregnancy and child care","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OA journal of pregnancy and child care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33118/OAJ.PREG.2019.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to explore women’s traumatic childbirth experiences in order to make maternity care professionals more aware of women’s intrapartum care needs to prevent traumatic experiences. Methods: A qualitative exploratory study with a constant comparison/ grounded theory design was performed. Thirty-six interviews were conducted with women who had given birth in a Dutch birth setting. Findings: Four themes, playing a profound role in the occurrence of traumatic birth experiences, emerged: 1 Midwife-LED care – Maternity care professionals’ unilateral decision making during intrapartum care. 2. Alienation – Women’s experiences of feeling distant and estranged from the childbirth event and the experience. 3. Situatedness – The difference of the impact of interventions in situations when complications or emergencies are present in contrast to when interventions are performed without an emergency reason. 4. Discrepancies - Paradoxes between expectations (ought self) and reality (actual self) - on an interpersonal (woman) and intrapersonal (woman-midwife) level. Implications for practice: Intrapartum care needs to include informed-consent and shared-decision making. Practitioners need to continuously evaluate if the woman is consistently part of her own childbearing process. Practitioners need to provide personalised care, make an effort to explain (emergency) situations, be conscious of their non-verbal communication and maintain an ongoing dialogue with the woman. Conclusion: Intrapartum care can be adapted, adopting a woman-centred approach, in order to prevent women’s traumatic childbirth experiences. This study can serve as a valuable assistance for maternity services, midwifery practice, research and for developing guidance in the field of midwifery practitioners’ education. Keywords: Traumatic birth experience, Maternity care, Intrapartum care, Informed-consent, Shared-decision making, Woman-centred care, Qualitative research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女的创伤分娩经验:反思和启示的实践
目的:本研究旨在探讨产妇的创伤性分娩经历,以提高产科护理人员对产妇产时护理需求的认识,预防创伤性分娩。方法:采用持续比较/扎根理论设计进行定性探索性研究。对在荷兰分娩环境中分娩的36名妇女进行了采访。发现:四个主题在分娩创伤经历的发生中发挥着深刻的作用:1助产士主导的护理-产科护理专业人员在产中护理中的单方面决策。疏离感-妇女对分娩事件和经历感到疏远和疏远的经历。情境性——当出现并发症或紧急情况时,干预措施的影响与没有紧急原因时的干预措施的影响的差异。差异-期望(应该的自我)和现实(实际的自我)之间的矛盾-在人际(女性)和个人(女性-助产士)层面上。对实践的启示:产时护理需要包括知情同意和共同决策。从业者需要持续评估女性是否始终如一地参与了自己的生育过程。从业人员需要提供个性化的护理,努力解释(紧急)情况,意识到他们的非语言交流,并与妇女保持持续的对话。结论:采用以妇女为中心的分娩护理方法,可有效预防产妇分娩创伤。本研究可为产妇服务、助产实践、研究及助产从业人员教育提供有价值的帮助。关键词:创伤性分娩经验,产科护理,产中护理,知情同意,共同决策,以妇女为中心的护理,定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of the level of maternal education on the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of Saudi infants with birth weight of 1000-1500 grams at the age of 21-24 months Effects of a practical resistance band training intervention on muscle soreness during pregnancy: A pilot study Beneficial effects of nicotinamide on the mouse model of preeclampsia. Perinatal depression effects: A narrative review Women’s traumatic childbirth experiences: Reflections and implications for practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1