Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of red (Hylocereus polyrhizus) and white (Hylocereus undatus) dragon fruits

N. N. A. Zakaria, Azrina Zolkopli Mohamad, Zuhar Zahir Tuan Harith, Nurhanan Abdul Rahman, Mohamad Feizal Daud
{"title":"Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of red (Hylocereus polyrhizus) and white (Hylocereus undatus) dragon fruits","authors":"N. N. A. Zakaria, Azrina Zolkopli Mohamad, Zuhar Zahir Tuan Harith, Nurhanan Abdul Rahman, Mohamad Feizal Daud","doi":"10.47253/jtrss.v10i1.892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dragon fruit belongs to the genus Hylocereus of the Cactaceae family. There are two species that are commonly cultivated; Hylocerues polyrhizus and Hylocereus undatus that have the same red skin but different flesh colours, red and white respectively. Although from the same genus, the phytochemical contents and bioactivities of both fruits may not be the same. This study aims to compare the phytochemical contents, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of H. polyrhizus and H. undatus to help consumers better choose nutritional fruits and to explore potential natural preservatives. The fruit samples were extracted using 50% ethanol and later were subjected to phytochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial assays. The phytochemical contents were determined using Folin Ciolcalteu and aluminium chloride methods for total phenolic and total flavonoid respectively. The antioxidant activity was determined using diphenyl-picryl hydrazine (DPPH) and 2,2-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assays. Disk diffusion method was performed to evaluate antibacterial activities against two food-borne pathogens, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. H. polyrhizus showed to contain significantly higher phenolic content (p<0.05), while H. undatus had significantly higher flavonoid content (p<0.05). Comparison of antioxidant activities in both fruit samples indicated higher activities were observed in H. polyrhizus and both fruit extracts showed inhibition zones against the tested bacteria with H. polyrhizus extract was able to inhibit at lower concentration. The results suggest that H. polyrhizus may have higher bioactivities compared to H. undatus due to the significantly higher phenolic content.","PeriodicalId":17457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science (JTRSS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science (JTRSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47253/jtrss.v10i1.892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Dragon fruit belongs to the genus Hylocereus of the Cactaceae family. There are two species that are commonly cultivated; Hylocerues polyrhizus and Hylocereus undatus that have the same red skin but different flesh colours, red and white respectively. Although from the same genus, the phytochemical contents and bioactivities of both fruits may not be the same. This study aims to compare the phytochemical contents, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of H. polyrhizus and H. undatus to help consumers better choose nutritional fruits and to explore potential natural preservatives. The fruit samples were extracted using 50% ethanol and later were subjected to phytochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial assays. The phytochemical contents were determined using Folin Ciolcalteu and aluminium chloride methods for total phenolic and total flavonoid respectively. The antioxidant activity was determined using diphenyl-picryl hydrazine (DPPH) and 2,2-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assays. Disk diffusion method was performed to evaluate antibacterial activities against two food-borne pathogens, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. H. polyrhizus showed to contain significantly higher phenolic content (p<0.05), while H. undatus had significantly higher flavonoid content (p<0.05). Comparison of antioxidant activities in both fruit samples indicated higher activities were observed in H. polyrhizus and both fruit extracts showed inhibition zones against the tested bacteria with H. polyrhizus extract was able to inhibit at lower concentration. The results suggest that H. polyrhizus may have higher bioactivities compared to H. undatus due to the significantly higher phenolic content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红火龙果和白火龙果的抗氧化和抗菌活性
火龙果属于仙人掌科火龙果属。有两种通常被种植;多根水葫芦和水葫芦具有相同的红色皮肤,但果肉颜色不同,分别为红色和白色。虽然来自同一属,但两种果实的植物化学成分和生物活性可能不相同。本研究的目的是比较多根水蛭和水蛭的植物化学成分、抗氧化和抗菌活性,以帮助消费者更好地选择营养丰富的水果,并探索潜在的天然防腐剂。用50%乙醇提取果实样品,进行植物化学、抗氧化和抗菌实验。采用福林法和氯化铝法分别测定总酚和总黄酮的含量。采用二苯基-苦味肼(DPPH)和2,2-氮基-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑-6-磺酸)(ABTS)法测定其抗氧化活性。采用纸片扩散法评价其对大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌两种食源性致病菌的抑菌活性。多根茎中酚类含量显著高于对照组(p<0.05),黄酮类含量显著高于对照组(p<0.05)。两种水果样品的抗氧化活性比较表明,多根草提取物均具有较高的抗氧化活性,且两种水果提取物均具有抑菌区,其中多根草提取物在较低浓度下均具有抑菌作用。结果表明,由于多根草中酚类物质含量明显高于黄刺草,因此其生物活性可能高于黄刺草。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Snails (Mollusca) diversity and its distribution in various type of microhabitats Assessment of flora diversity and population structure in Lagos-Sagamu-Abeokuta Expressway, Southwestern Nigeria Assessment of certain micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Ni, and Se) in some herbal snuff stocks consumed in Sokoto, Nigeria Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of commercial shrimp paste in Besut market Determinant of Extension Agent’s Skills Towards Work Performance As Perceived By Productive Cocoa Farmers In Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1