Equitable Evaluation Of Bilingual Children's Language Knowledge Using the CDI

A. D. Houwer
{"title":"Equitable Evaluation Of Bilingual Children's Language Knowledge Using the CDI","authors":"A. D. Houwer","doi":"10.1558/JMBS.11184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The parent report or rating instrument commonly known as the CDI is an effective and fast method for evaluating, among other things, young children’s early comprehension and production vocabulary. It is widely used with both monolingual and bilingual populations. However, when the CDI is used with bilingual populations, methodological issues arise as to how the instrument can best be employed so that the evaluation is as complete and equitable as possible. It is commonly agreed that children need to be evaluated in both their languages. Who should provide these dual language data is less clear, and there is little attention to how data should be evaluated. Based on a detailed case study, this article focuses on some of these issues, with particular consideration given to (1) the added value of engaging more than a single rater per language in CDI data collection, and (2) the way ratings are processed. Given appropriate methodological attention, the CDI can effectively screen young bilingual children for a possible language delay. The article ends with a proposal for how one could do so in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":73840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of monolingual and bilingual speech","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of monolingual and bilingual speech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMBS.11184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The parent report or rating instrument commonly known as the CDI is an effective and fast method for evaluating, among other things, young children’s early comprehension and production vocabulary. It is widely used with both monolingual and bilingual populations. However, when the CDI is used with bilingual populations, methodological issues arise as to how the instrument can best be employed so that the evaluation is as complete and equitable as possible. It is commonly agreed that children need to be evaluated in both their languages. Who should provide these dual language data is less clear, and there is little attention to how data should be evaluated. Based on a detailed case study, this article focuses on some of these issues, with particular consideration given to (1) the added value of engaging more than a single rater per language in CDI data collection, and (2) the way ratings are processed. Given appropriate methodological attention, the CDI can effectively screen young bilingual children for a possible language delay. The article ends with a proposal for how one could do so in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于CDI的双语儿童语言知识公平评价
家长报告或评级工具通常被称为CDI,是一种有效和快速的方法来评估幼儿的早期理解和生产词汇。它广泛用于单语和双语人群。但是,当对双语人口使用国别发展指标时,就会出现方法问题,即如何最好地利用这一工具,使评价尽可能全面和公平。人们普遍认为,需要用两种语言对儿童进行评估。谁应该提供这些双语数据不太清楚,而且很少注意数据应该如何评估。基于一个详细的案例研究,本文将重点讨论其中的一些问题,并特别考虑(1)在CDI数据收集中为每种语言聘请多个评价者的附加价值,以及(2)处理评价者的方式。给予适当的方法上的注意,CDI可以有效地筛选年轻的双语儿童可能的语言迟缓。文章最后提出了在临床实践中如何做到这一点的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between executive function, age of L2 acquisition and speech disfluencies in bilinguals Listen-and-repeat training of non-native vowel quality Code-switching in the speech of a balanced infant bilingual and early talker Implementing recommended approaches to assessing multilingual children’s speech Variability in English-Spanish bilingual phonotactics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1