Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Community and Hospital Acquired Infections in Bandar Abbas

T. Dehghani, A. Karmostaji
{"title":"Molecular and Phenotypic Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Community and Hospital Acquired Infections in Bandar Abbas","authors":"T. Dehghani, A. Karmostaji","doi":"10.52547/iem.8.3.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess the molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) infections in Bandar Abbas, southern Iran. Materials & Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 110 S. aureus strains isolated from 59 outpatients and 51 inpatients during 2018-2019. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using disc diffusion method. Epsilometer test was used to measure vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Cefoxitin disc (30 μg) was used to screen MRSA isolates. The presence of mecA gene was examined by PCR method. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types were detected in S. aureus isolates using multiplex-PCR. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyze the results. Findings: Out of 110 isolates, 45 (40.9%) isolates carried the mecA gene: 20 (39.2%) isolates from inpatients and 25 (42.4%) isolates from outpatients. MRSA isolates showed the highest resistance to azithromycin (69.8%), tetracycline (60.4%), and clindamycin (32.1%), respectively. Vancomycin MIC against MRSA isolates ranged from 0.75 to 5 μg/mL. SCCmec type I, III, IV, and V were detected in 20 (44.4%), three (6.7%), 16 (35.5%), and six (13.3%) isolates, respectively. Conclusion: The predominant SCCmec types were type I and type IV, which were detected in CA-and HA-MRSA isolates, respectively. No significant difference in the presence of SCCmec type III and antibiotic resistance was found between CA- and HA-MRSA isolates, indicating the possibility of cross-infection between these isolates. Developing appropriate treatment protocols to prevent the spread of MRSA infections in the community is currently an urgent need.","PeriodicalId":34545,"journal":{"name":"Infection Epidemiology and Microbiology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Epidemiology and Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/iem.8.3.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) infections in Bandar Abbas, southern Iran. Materials & Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 110 S. aureus strains isolated from 59 outpatients and 51 inpatients during 2018-2019. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using disc diffusion method. Epsilometer test was used to measure vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Cefoxitin disc (30 μg) was used to screen MRSA isolates. The presence of mecA gene was examined by PCR method. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types were detected in S. aureus isolates using multiplex-PCR. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyze the results. Findings: Out of 110 isolates, 45 (40.9%) isolates carried the mecA gene: 20 (39.2%) isolates from inpatients and 25 (42.4%) isolates from outpatients. MRSA isolates showed the highest resistance to azithromycin (69.8%), tetracycline (60.4%), and clindamycin (32.1%), respectively. Vancomycin MIC against MRSA isolates ranged from 0.75 to 5 μg/mL. SCCmec type I, III, IV, and V were detected in 20 (44.4%), three (6.7%), 16 (35.5%), and six (13.3%) isolates, respectively. Conclusion: The predominant SCCmec types were type I and type IV, which were detected in CA-and HA-MRSA isolates, respectively. No significant difference in the presence of SCCmec type III and antibiotic resistance was found between CA- and HA-MRSA isolates, indicating the possibility of cross-infection between these isolates. Developing appropriate treatment protocols to prevent the spread of MRSA infections in the community is currently an urgent need.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿巴斯港社区和医院获得性感染中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的分子和表型特征
本研究旨在评估伊朗南部阿巴斯港社区获得性(CA)和医院获得性(HA)感染中分离的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌株的分子特征。材料与方法:对2018-2019年从59例门诊患者和51例住院患者中分离的110株金黄色葡萄球菌进行描述性横断面研究。药敏试验采用纸片扩散法。采用Epsilometer法测定万古霉素最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。头孢西丁片(30 μg)筛选MRSA分离株。采用PCR法检测mecA基因的存在。采用多重pcr方法检测金黄色葡萄球菌盒式染色体mec (SCCmec)型。使用卡方检验和费雪精确检验来分析结果。结果:110株分离株中有45株(40.9%)携带mecA基因,其中住院患者分离株20株(39.2%),门诊患者分离株25株(42.4%)。MRSA对阿奇霉素(69.8%)、四环素(60.4%)和克林霉素(32.1%)的耐药率最高。万古霉素对MRSA分离株的MIC范围为0.75 ~ 5 μg/mL。SCCmecⅰ型20株(44.4%),ⅲ型3株(6.7%),ⅳ型16株(35.5%),V型6株(13.3%)。结论:ca和HA-MRSA分离株的scmec主要为I型和IV型。CA-和HA-MRSA分离株之间SCCmec III型的存在和抗生素耐药性无显著差异,表明这些分离株之间可能存在交叉感染。目前迫切需要制定适当的治疗方案以防止MRSA感染在社区传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracing the Origin and Early Progression of COVID-19 in Europe: An Epidemiological Descriptive Study Exploring Antibiotic Susceptibility in Otomycosis: Uncovering Mixed Infections of Fungal and Bacterial Origin in Indonesia Antimicrobial Activity of Traditional Medicinal Plant Extracts against Bacterial and Fungal Strains Causing Dental Caries: An in Vitro Study Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum B-Lactamase (ESBL) and Quinolone Resistance (qnr) Genes among Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor-1-Producing Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Babylon, Iraq Association between Torque Teno Virus Frequency and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Potential Trigger for Autoimmune Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1