Effect of Different Drop Heights and Load on Lower Extremity Kinetics in Landing Task

Seung-Hyun Hyun
{"title":"Effect of Different Drop Heights and Load on Lower Extremity Kinetics in Landing Task","authors":"Seung-Hyun Hyun","doi":"10.7236/JIIBC.2021.21.3.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human’s landing strategies have been explained through lower extremity kinetics in various conditions. However, how lower extremity kinetics respond when the two conditions between a load and landing height are combined is not yet understood. To achieve the purpose of this study, a total of 20 men and women were subjected to drop landing according to a load(No load, 10%, 20%, 30% of the body weight) at various landing heights(0.3 m, 0.4 m, 0.5 m). As a result of the study, the main effect of a load was not statistically significant in all variables. But increasing of the landing heights showed more flexion angle which was statistically significant in knee joint. In addition, as the landing height increased, the medial-lateral, anterior-posterior, vertical force, and loading rate increased, while time to peak vertical force decreased which was statistically significant. Thus, humans can successfully perform the landing motion even if the load is changed at various heights. However, it reacted more sensitively to the change in landing height than that load condition. The landing height can be prepared for recognition and shock absorption through visual information, but the weight level is difficult for the body to perceive and explains why it is more difficult to apply it to the landing strategy mechanism for shock absorption.","PeriodicalId":22795,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Institute of Webcasting, Internet and Telecommunication","volume":"119 14 1","pages":"115-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Institute of Webcasting, Internet and Telecommunication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2021.21.3.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Human’s landing strategies have been explained through lower extremity kinetics in various conditions. However, how lower extremity kinetics respond when the two conditions between a load and landing height are combined is not yet understood. To achieve the purpose of this study, a total of 20 men and women were subjected to drop landing according to a load(No load, 10%, 20%, 30% of the body weight) at various landing heights(0.3 m, 0.4 m, 0.5 m). As a result of the study, the main effect of a load was not statistically significant in all variables. But increasing of the landing heights showed more flexion angle which was statistically significant in knee joint. In addition, as the landing height increased, the medial-lateral, anterior-posterior, vertical force, and loading rate increased, while time to peak vertical force decreased which was statistically significant. Thus, humans can successfully perform the landing motion even if the load is changed at various heights. However, it reacted more sensitively to the change in landing height than that load condition. The landing height can be prepared for recognition and shock absorption through visual information, but the weight level is difficult for the body to perceive and explains why it is more difficult to apply it to the landing strategy mechanism for shock absorption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同落点高度和载荷对着陆任务下肢动力学的影响
从下肢动力学角度解释了人类在不同条件下的着陆策略。然而,当载荷和着陆高度这两种条件结合在一起时,下肢动力学如何响应尚不清楚。为了达到本研究的目的,共有20名男性和女性在不同的着陆高度(0.3 m、0.4 m、0.5 m)下,按照载荷(空载、体重的10%、20%、30%)进行了空降试验。研究结果表明,载荷的主效应在所有变量中均无统计学意义。但随着着地高度的增加,膝关节的屈曲角度增加,有统计学意义。此外,随着着陆高度的增加,中外侧力、前后力、垂直力和载荷率增加,垂直力达到峰值的时间减少,差异有统计学意义。因此,即使负载在不同高度发生变化,人类也能成功地完成着陆动作。然而,它对着陆高度变化的反应比负载条件更敏感。着陆高度可以通过视觉信息为识别和减震做准备,但体重水平很难被身体感知,这也解释了为什么将其应用于减震的着陆策略机制更困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Apple Detection Algorithm based on an Improved SSD Effect of Investment Evaluation Criteria of Public ICT Projects on Business Success Lightweight of ONNX using Quantization-based Model Compression A study on Recognition of Inpatient Room Acoustic Pattern for Hospital safety An emprical analysis on the effect of OTT company's content investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1