Pushing Forward the Transition to a Circular Economy by Adopting an Actor Engagement Lens

IF 9.8 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Service Research Pub Date : 2023-05-20 DOI:10.1177/10946705231175937
K. Verleye, Arne De Keyser, N. Raassens, A. Alblas, Fernando C. Lit, J. Huijben
{"title":"Pushing Forward the Transition to a Circular Economy by Adopting an Actor Engagement Lens","authors":"K. Verleye, Arne De Keyser, N. Raassens, A. Alblas, Fernando C. Lit, J. Huijben","doi":"10.1177/10946705231175937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Circular business models (CBMs), such as product-service systems, are rapidly gaining traction in light of a transition to a more circular and sustainable economy. The authors call for a new approach to inform and guide the development and adoption of these CBMs. The main reason is that different actors in the service ecosystems or networks linked to these business models—such as firms, customers, and governmental bodies—may be reluctant to join or even impede the transition to a circular economy. Based upon an abductive analysis of 133 CBM papers with the Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) framework as organizing structure, the authors theorize about how to achieve “circular economy engagement” ( i.e., an actor’s disposition to embrace CBMs). Specifically, they highlight and illustrate the role of (1) signaling and convincing as motivation-related practices, (2) matching and legitimizing as opportunity-related practices, and (3) supporting and empowering as ability-related practices. The authors provide illustrative cases for each of these practices along with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications and the remaining challenges—all with the key aim to push the transition to a circular economy forward.","PeriodicalId":48358,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231175937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Circular business models (CBMs), such as product-service systems, are rapidly gaining traction in light of a transition to a more circular and sustainable economy. The authors call for a new approach to inform and guide the development and adoption of these CBMs. The main reason is that different actors in the service ecosystems or networks linked to these business models—such as firms, customers, and governmental bodies—may be reluctant to join or even impede the transition to a circular economy. Based upon an abductive analysis of 133 CBM papers with the Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) framework as organizing structure, the authors theorize about how to achieve “circular economy engagement” ( i.e., an actor’s disposition to embrace CBMs). Specifically, they highlight and illustrate the role of (1) signaling and convincing as motivation-related practices, (2) matching and legitimizing as opportunity-related practices, and (3) supporting and empowering as ability-related practices. The authors provide illustrative cases for each of these practices along with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications and the remaining challenges—all with the key aim to push the transition to a circular economy forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用行动者参与镜头推动向循环经济过渡
在向更加循环和可持续的经济转型的背景下,产品-服务体系等循环商业模式正迅速获得关注。这组作者呼吁采用一种新的方法,为这些信任措施的制定和采用提供信息和指导。主要原因是与这些商业模式相关的服务生态系统或网络中的不同参与者——如公司、客户和政府机构——可能不愿意加入甚至阻碍向循环经济的过渡。基于对133篇以动机-机会-能力(MOA)框架为组织结构的CBM论文的溯因分析,作者对如何实现“循环经济参与”(即行为者接受CBM的倾向)进行了理论分析。具体来说,他们强调并说明了(1)信号和说服作为动机相关的实践,(2)匹配和合法化作为机会相关的实践,以及(3)支持和授权作为能力相关的实践。作者为每一种实践提供了说明性案例,并讨论了理论和实践意义以及剩余的挑战——所有这些都是为了推动向循环经济的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Research (JSR) is recognized as the foremost service research journal globally. It is an indispensable resource for staying updated on the latest advancements in service research. With its accessible and applicable approach, JSR equips readers with the essential knowledge and strategies needed to navigate an increasingly service-oriented economy. Brimming with contributions from esteemed service professionals and scholars, JSR presents a wealth of articles that offer invaluable insights from academia and industry alike.
期刊最新文献
Humans Vs. Service Robots as Social Actors in Persuasion Settings Responding to Cyberattacks: The Persuasiveness of Claiming Victimhood Unethical Consumer Behavior Following Artificial Intelligence Agent Encounters: The Differential Effect of AI Agent Roles and its Boundary Conditions A Framework of Services-as-Practices The AR Cloud: Navigating Metaverse Augmentation Technologies for Enhanced Co-Creation of Value Within Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1