Optimisation of the preparation of chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil by the use of peristaltic pumps

A. Villain, I. Sakji, E. Bogart, G. Strobbe, G. Marliot, F. Feutry
{"title":"Optimisation of the preparation of chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil by the use of peristaltic pumps","authors":"A. Villain, I. Sakji, E. Bogart, G. Strobbe, G. Marliot, F. Feutry","doi":"10.1515/pthp-2020-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Preparation of 5-FU elastomeric pumps is a time-consuming activity inducing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Our unit has developed an automated filling system consisting of two peristaltic pumps (one for the diluent, one for the cytotoxic drug). The objective was to validate the accuracy of the assembly and evaluate the impact of automation on the compounding time, occurrence of MSDs and cost of preparation. Methods Accuracy was determined by calculating the total error on the volumes injected by the pumps. Measurements were made for 2 brands (AMF, Baxter), 3 different volumes; repeated 3 times at 3 times of the day. The time-saving study compared 24 measurements in manual filling and 24 in automated mode. Impact of automation on the occurrence of MSDs was evaluated by a self-assessment questionnaire. Finally, a comparison between the price of a manually prepared elastomeric pump and an automated prepared elastomeric pump was performed. Results Volumes administered by the pumps were accurate (total error < 2.5%). Preparation time was divided by 2. Occurrence of MSD decreased (8.7 manual filling vs. 23.5/28 automated filling). Overcost was moderate (14.7% for AMF; 10.3% for Baxter). Conclusions Using peristaltic pumps, 5FU preparation was optimized for moderate additional cost.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2020-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Preparation of 5-FU elastomeric pumps is a time-consuming activity inducing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Our unit has developed an automated filling system consisting of two peristaltic pumps (one for the diluent, one for the cytotoxic drug). The objective was to validate the accuracy of the assembly and evaluate the impact of automation on the compounding time, occurrence of MSDs and cost of preparation. Methods Accuracy was determined by calculating the total error on the volumes injected by the pumps. Measurements were made for 2 brands (AMF, Baxter), 3 different volumes; repeated 3 times at 3 times of the day. The time-saving study compared 24 measurements in manual filling and 24 in automated mode. Impact of automation on the occurrence of MSDs was evaluated by a self-assessment questionnaire. Finally, a comparison between the price of a manually prepared elastomeric pump and an automated prepared elastomeric pump was performed. Results Volumes administered by the pumps were accurate (total error < 2.5%). Preparation time was divided by 2. Occurrence of MSD decreased (8.7 manual filling vs. 23.5/28 automated filling). Overcost was moderate (14.7% for AMF; 10.3% for Baxter). Conclusions Using peristaltic pumps, 5FU preparation was optimized for moderate additional cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用蠕动泵优化5-氟尿嘧啶化疗制剂的制备
摘要目的制备5-FU弹性泵是一项耗时的诱发肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)的活动。我们的单位已经开发了一个自动灌装系统,包括两个蠕动泵(一个用于稀释剂,一个用于细胞毒性药物)。目的是验证装配的准确性,并评估自动化对复合时间、MSDs的发生和制备成本的影响。方法通过计算泵进样量的总误差来确定准确度。测量了2个品牌(AMF, Baxter), 3个不同的体积;每天3次重复3次。节省时间的研究比较了24个测量在手动填充和24个自动模式。采用自评问卷评估自动化对msd发生的影响。最后,对人工制备的弹性体泵和自动制备的弹性体泵的价格进行了比较。结果泵给气量准确(总误差< 2.5%)。准备时间除以2。MSD的发生率降低(手动灌装8.7 vs.自动灌装23.5/28)。过度成本适中(AMF为14.7%;百特为10.3%)。结论采用蠕动泵制备5FU的工艺优化,增加费用适中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physicochemical stability of urea-containing Mitomycin C preparations in glass vials (1.0 mg/mL) and plastic syringes (2.0, 0.4, 0.2 mg/mL) Physicochemical stability of durvalumab (Imfinzi®) concentrate for solution in original vials after first opening Semi-automatic COVID-19 vaccine preparation for upscaling of vaccination: a descriptive study Assessment of the relevance of osmolality measurement as a criterion for the stability of solutions Use of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to assess the concentration of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine stored in plastic syringes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1