Assessment of the relevance of osmolality measurement as a criterion for the stability of solutions

J. Vigneron, Matthieu Sacrez, E. D’huart, B. Demoré
{"title":"Assessment of the relevance of osmolality measurement as a criterion for the stability of solutions","authors":"J. Vigneron, Matthieu Sacrez, E. D’huart, B. Demoré","doi":"10.1515/pthp-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The measurement of osmolality is used by many authors as an additional stability criterion of a drug in solution. In the current state of knowledge, no scientific publication correlates the osmolality values and the stability of a solution. To study the relevance of this analytical technique by measuring the osmolality of injectable solutions whose instability has been chemically demonstrated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Methods Selection of 13 drug preparations whose chemical instability has been demonstrated in the literature. Realization of three identical samples per selected preparation and measurements of the osmolality of the freshly prepared solutions, then, at various storage times until a chemical degradation of the molecule validated by HPLC of at least 10% and possibly up to 40%. Results Measurements of the osmolality were performed on five antibiotics (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefepime, cefoxitine, meropenem and temocillin and cefoxitin) and five anticancer drugs (azacitidine, bendamustine, busulfan, fotemustine and oxaliplatin). Osmolality varied from −6.30 to 11.10% for antibiotics and from 0.57 to 2.04%. Conclusions Among the preparations tested, only two formulations have a variation in osmolality in accordance with the chemical degradation. For the other 11 formulas, the variations in osmolality values where not correlated with the degradation measured by HPLC. In view of these results, osmolality does not seem to be a criterion of choice for the study of drug stability. In the majority of the unstable solutions studied, the variation of osmolality measurements does not correlate with the loss of concentration and the appearance of degradation products.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The measurement of osmolality is used by many authors as an additional stability criterion of a drug in solution. In the current state of knowledge, no scientific publication correlates the osmolality values and the stability of a solution. To study the relevance of this analytical technique by measuring the osmolality of injectable solutions whose instability has been chemically demonstrated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Methods Selection of 13 drug preparations whose chemical instability has been demonstrated in the literature. Realization of three identical samples per selected preparation and measurements of the osmolality of the freshly prepared solutions, then, at various storage times until a chemical degradation of the molecule validated by HPLC of at least 10% and possibly up to 40%. Results Measurements of the osmolality were performed on five antibiotics (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefepime, cefoxitine, meropenem and temocillin and cefoxitin) and five anticancer drugs (azacitidine, bendamustine, busulfan, fotemustine and oxaliplatin). Osmolality varied from −6.30 to 11.10% for antibiotics and from 0.57 to 2.04%. Conclusions Among the preparations tested, only two formulations have a variation in osmolality in accordance with the chemical degradation. For the other 11 formulas, the variations in osmolality values where not correlated with the degradation measured by HPLC. In view of these results, osmolality does not seem to be a criterion of choice for the study of drug stability. In the majority of the unstable solutions studied, the variation of osmolality measurements does not correlate with the loss of concentration and the appearance of degradation products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价渗透压测量作为溶液稳定性标准的相关性
摘要目的渗透压的测量被许多作者用作溶液中药物稳定性的附加标准。在目前的知识状态下,没有科学出版物将渗透压值与溶液的稳定性联系起来。用高效液相色谱法测定不稳定注射溶液的渗透压,研究该分析技术的相关性。方法选择13种经文献证实化学不稳定性的药物制剂。在不同的储存时间内,每个选定的制剂实现三个相同的样品,并测量新鲜制备的溶液的渗透压,直到通过HPLC验证分子的化学降解至少为10%,可能高达40%。结果测定了5种抗生素(阿莫西林/克拉维酸、头孢吡肟、头孢西汀、美罗培南、替莫西林和头孢西汀)和5种抗癌药物(阿扎胞苷、苯达莫司汀、布磺胺、替莫司汀和奥沙利铂)的渗透压。抗生素的渗透压为- 6.30 ~ 11.10%,0.57 ~ 2.04%。结论所测制剂中,只有两种制剂的渗透压随化学降解而变化。对于其他11个配方,渗透压值的变化与HPLC测量的降解无关。鉴于这些结果,渗透压似乎不是药物稳定性研究的选择标准。在研究的大多数不稳定溶液中,渗透压测量值的变化与浓度损失和降解产物的出现无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physicochemical stability of urea-containing Mitomycin C preparations in glass vials (1.0 mg/mL) and plastic syringes (2.0, 0.4, 0.2 mg/mL) Physicochemical stability of durvalumab (Imfinzi®) concentrate for solution in original vials after first opening Semi-automatic COVID-19 vaccine preparation for upscaling of vaccination: a descriptive study Assessment of the relevance of osmolality measurement as a criterion for the stability of solutions Use of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to assess the concentration of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine stored in plastic syringes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1