The Political Economy of Independent Central Banks

Andreas Kern, J. Seddon
{"title":"The Political Economy of Independent Central Banks","authors":"Andreas Kern, J. Seddon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3687144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central bank independence (CBI) has been understood to originate in domestic political commitments to tackle inflation and government profligacy. But recent studies demonstrate that international financial institutions (IFIs) and capital markets also play a role in influencing states to delegate their powers to independent monetary authorities, i.e. to central banks. Further, it is apparent that central banks have powers that extend beyond maintaining price stability and reining in government spending. But scholars have yet to develop a theoretical framework that satisfactorily explains the origins of CBI — still less reversions therefrom. Drawing on the theories of institutional design, we hypothesize that domestic and international creditors use CBI to resolve the problems of control and information that are inherent to sovereign lending. Specifically, we argue that CBI is used to split central banks off from sovereign states, and to establish shared liabilities between the governments (still sovereign but diminished in power) and their central banks. This separation — often buttressed by elaborate structures of international surveillance and control — creates incentives for the paired agents to monitor and discipline each other, thereby curtailing the political hazard of sovereign lending. We also hypothesize that reductions in the power of lenders precipitate corresponding reductions in CBI. Using an in-depth historical survey of the German central bank in the interwar period to test our argument, we reveal dramatic variation in CBI attributable to the capacity of lenders to split sovereigns.","PeriodicalId":10548,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3687144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Central bank independence (CBI) has been understood to originate in domestic political commitments to tackle inflation and government profligacy. But recent studies demonstrate that international financial institutions (IFIs) and capital markets also play a role in influencing states to delegate their powers to independent monetary authorities, i.e. to central banks. Further, it is apparent that central banks have powers that extend beyond maintaining price stability and reining in government spending. But scholars have yet to develop a theoretical framework that satisfactorily explains the origins of CBI — still less reversions therefrom. Drawing on the theories of institutional design, we hypothesize that domestic and international creditors use CBI to resolve the problems of control and information that are inherent to sovereign lending. Specifically, we argue that CBI is used to split central banks off from sovereign states, and to establish shared liabilities between the governments (still sovereign but diminished in power) and their central banks. This separation — often buttressed by elaborate structures of international surveillance and control — creates incentives for the paired agents to monitor and discipline each other, thereby curtailing the political hazard of sovereign lending. We also hypothesize that reductions in the power of lenders precipitate corresponding reductions in CBI. Using an in-depth historical survey of the German central bank in the interwar period to test our argument, we reveal dramatic variation in CBI attributable to the capacity of lenders to split sovereigns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立中央银行的政治经济学
人们认为,央行独立性(CBI)源于应对通胀和政府挥霍的国内政治承诺。但最近的研究表明,国际金融机构(IFIs)和资本市场在影响国家将其权力下放给独立的货币当局(即中央银行)方面也发挥了作用。此外,央行的权力显然不仅限于维持物价稳定和控制政府支出。但是学者们还没有发展出一个理论框架来令人满意地解释CBI的起源,更不用说从CBI的起源回归了。根据制度设计理论,我们假设国内和国际债权人使用CBI来解决主权贷款固有的控制和信息问题。具体来说,我们认为CBI被用来将中央银行从主权国家中分离出来,并在政府(仍然是主权的,但权力减弱了)和它们的中央银行之间建立共同的债务。这种分离——通常得到精心设计的国际监督和控制结构的支持——为成对的代理机构相互监督和约束创造了动力,从而减少了主权贷款的政治风险。我们还假设,贷方权力的减少会导致CBI的相应减少。为了验证我们的观点,我们对两次世界大战之间的德国央行进行了深入的历史调查,结果发现,由于贷方分裂主权的能力,CBI发生了巨大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rebalancing the Euro Area: Is Wage Adjustment in Germany the Answer? Labour Markets and Inflation in the Wake of the Pandemic The Effects of U.S. Monetary Policy on International Mutual Fund Investment Safe Assets and Financial Fragility: Theory and Evidence Explorations in Economic History: A Test of Structural Break in the US Money Supply Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1