The tree of community knowledge and engagement

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement Pub Date : 2020-05-31 DOI:10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6745
Morgan Gardner, Kate Scarth
{"title":"The tree of community knowledge and engagement","authors":"Morgan Gardner, Kate Scarth","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep-seated educational discourses have blamed low-income communities for their youth’s lack of high school completion. These deficit discourses reflect top–down knowledge hierarchies and a lack of knowledge democracy in education (de Sousa Santos 2007; Hall & Tandon 2017; Visvanathan 2009), and they are in need of critical and diverse knowledge reckoning by low-income communities themselves. This article relays how a community-university participatory action research (PAR) partnership became a dynamic site of knowledge democracy from which to counter and transform deficit-based knowledge systems imposed on economically disadvantaged communities. Steeped in the generative enactments of PAR, storytelling, ecological metaphor, strength-based approaches and the arts, this article explores a low-income/social housing community’s knowledge practices that are energising and growing its community power to support the success of their youth in school. These seven knowledge practices are narrated through the ecological metaphor of trees, specifically via a co-constructed PAR team narrative called the Tree of Community Knowledge and Engagement. \nIn the telling and retelling of this counternarrative-in-the-making, this article embodies knowledge democracy. Here, community members’ energising knowledge practices are recognised as invaluable forms of everyday educational knowing and leadership for their youth. This article further explores three broad ways of knowing that reside within and across community members’ seven knowledge practices: lived knowing, interconnected knowing and participatory/power-in-relation knowing. The three community ways of knowing illustrate how the community is growing its power to support youth’s success via a transformative educational worldview, from which other schools and universities could learn and, indeed, thrive.","PeriodicalId":53967,"journal":{"name":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Deep-seated educational discourses have blamed low-income communities for their youth’s lack of high school completion. These deficit discourses reflect top–down knowledge hierarchies and a lack of knowledge democracy in education (de Sousa Santos 2007; Hall & Tandon 2017; Visvanathan 2009), and they are in need of critical and diverse knowledge reckoning by low-income communities themselves. This article relays how a community-university participatory action research (PAR) partnership became a dynamic site of knowledge democracy from which to counter and transform deficit-based knowledge systems imposed on economically disadvantaged communities. Steeped in the generative enactments of PAR, storytelling, ecological metaphor, strength-based approaches and the arts, this article explores a low-income/social housing community’s knowledge practices that are energising and growing its community power to support the success of their youth in school. These seven knowledge practices are narrated through the ecological metaphor of trees, specifically via a co-constructed PAR team narrative called the Tree of Community Knowledge and Engagement. In the telling and retelling of this counternarrative-in-the-making, this article embodies knowledge democracy. Here, community members’ energising knowledge practices are recognised as invaluable forms of everyday educational knowing and leadership for their youth. This article further explores three broad ways of knowing that reside within and across community members’ seven knowledge practices: lived knowing, interconnected knowing and participatory/power-in-relation knowing. The three community ways of knowing illustrate how the community is growing its power to support youth’s success via a transformative educational worldview, from which other schools and universities could learn and, indeed, thrive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区知识和参与树
根深蒂固的教育话语指责低收入社区的年轻人没有完成高中学业。这些赤字话语反映了自上而下的知识等级制度和教育中知识民主的缺乏(de Sousa Santos 2007;霍尔&坦顿2017;Visvanathan, 2009),他们需要低收入社区自己进行批判性和多样化的知识评估。本文讲述了社区-大学参与式行动研究(PAR)伙伴关系如何成为知识民主的动态场所,从而对抗和转变强加于经济弱势社区的基于赤字的知识系统。这篇文章通过PAR的生成性制定、讲故事、生态隐喻、基于力量的方法和艺术,探讨了一个低收入/社会住房社区的知识实践,这些实践正在激发和增长其社区力量,以支持他们的年轻人在学校取得成功。这七种知识实践通过树木的生态隐喻来叙述,特别是通过共同构建的PAR团队叙事,称为社区知识和参与之树。在对这种“正在形成的反叙事”的讲述和复述中,本文体现了知识民主。在这里,社区成员充满活力的知识实践被认为是青少年日常教育知识和领导能力的宝贵形式。本文进一步探讨了存在于社区成员的七个知识实践内部和之间的三种广泛的知识方式:生活知识、相互关联的知识和参与性/权力关系知识。这三种社区的认知方式说明了社区如何通过一种变革性的教育世界观来增强其支持年轻人成功的力量,其他学校和大学也可以从中学习并茁壮成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
5
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Stroke Community Rehabilitation Centre (SCORE): A community transformation program Oral health education for school children and capacity building of local community health workers in cleft care: An experience of student-led community service in a West Java village Voice, Choice and Power: Using co-production to develop a community engagement strategy for an ethnically diverse community Gardening education in early childhood: Important factors supporting the success of implementing it Re-imagining the research article: Social-semiotic signposts and the potential for radical co-presence in the scholarly literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1