Prevalence Study of Microbiological and Physicochemical Quality of Water from Boreholes and Hand-dug Wells located in Ejisu-Juaben Municipal District's Urban Communities -

Yaw Owusu Afriyie Kusi
{"title":"Prevalence Study of Microbiological and Physicochemical Quality of Water from Boreholes and Hand-dug Wells located in Ejisu-Juaben Municipal District's Urban Communities -","authors":"Yaw Owusu Afriyie Kusi","doi":"10.5455/jeos.20160517103749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The microbial and physico-chemical quality of water from boreholes and hand-dug wells in urban communities within the Ejisu-Juaben Municipality of Ashanti region was studied. Method: Water samples were collected from three boreholes and three hand-dug wells selected randomly from each community and the water samples analyzed using various standard methods. Results: pH of the water from boreholes and hand-dug wells ranged from pH 4.34-5.13 units which fell below WHO guideline value for drinking water. The water was non-saline with all TDS values less than 1000 mg/l and soft to slightly hard (18.89-127.00 mg/l CaCO3). The anion (SO4-2, NO3-, Cl- and F-) levels in the water samples from selected boreholes and hand-dug wells were observed to be low and fell within the WHO guideline values. One borehole at Ejisu and two boreholes at Juaben recorded total coliform in water samples with mean values of 2.08 x 104 and 3.06 x 104 CFU 100ml-1 respectively with zero counts for faecal coliform and E. coli. Boreholes at Fumesua and Bonwire recorded zero counts for total coliforms, faecal coliforms and E. coli. Only one borehole at Besease recorded total coliforms, faecal coliforms and E. coli in water samples. Most hand-dug wells selected for the study recorded total coliforms, faecal coliforms and E. coli in samples with mean values of 4.92 x 105, 1.01x105 and 3.81 x 104 CFU 100ml-1 respectively. The mean differences of total coliforms, faecal coliform and E. coli counts between boreholes and hand-dug well was highly significant (p=0.001, p=0.014 and p=0.001 respectively). Conclusion: Bacteriological quality of the water from all hand-dug wells were very poor (above detectable limits) compared to the boreholes and thus must be treated before use.","PeriodicalId":16086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"30-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jeos.20160517103749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: The microbial and physico-chemical quality of water from boreholes and hand-dug wells in urban communities within the Ejisu-Juaben Municipality of Ashanti region was studied. Method: Water samples were collected from three boreholes and three hand-dug wells selected randomly from each community and the water samples analyzed using various standard methods. Results: pH of the water from boreholes and hand-dug wells ranged from pH 4.34-5.13 units which fell below WHO guideline value for drinking water. The water was non-saline with all TDS values less than 1000 mg/l and soft to slightly hard (18.89-127.00 mg/l CaCO3). The anion (SO4-2, NO3-, Cl- and F-) levels in the water samples from selected boreholes and hand-dug wells were observed to be low and fell within the WHO guideline values. One borehole at Ejisu and two boreholes at Juaben recorded total coliform in water samples with mean values of 2.08 x 104 and 3.06 x 104 CFU 100ml-1 respectively with zero counts for faecal coliform and E. coli. Boreholes at Fumesua and Bonwire recorded zero counts for total coliforms, faecal coliforms and E. coli. Only one borehole at Besease recorded total coliforms, faecal coliforms and E. coli in water samples. Most hand-dug wells selected for the study recorded total coliforms, faecal coliforms and E. coli in samples with mean values of 4.92 x 105, 1.01x105 and 3.81 x 104 CFU 100ml-1 respectively. The mean differences of total coliforms, faecal coliform and E. coli counts between boreholes and hand-dug well was highly significant (p=0.001, p=0.014 and p=0.001 respectively). Conclusion: Bacteriological quality of the water from all hand-dug wells were very poor (above detectable limits) compared to the boreholes and thus must be treated before use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
济苏—聚本市辖区城市社区钻孔和手挖井水微生物及理化质量流行病学研究
目的:对阿善蒂地区埃济苏—华本市城市社区钻孔水和手挖井水的微生物和理化性质进行了研究。方法:在每个社区随机抽取3口钻孔和3口手挖井进行水样采集,采用各种标准方法进行水样分析。结果:钻孔水和手挖井水pH值在4.34 ~ 5.13单位之间,低于WHO饮用水指导值。水为无盐水,TDS值均小于1000 mg/l,软至微硬(CaCO3 18.89 ~ 127.00 mg/l)。所选钻孔和手挖井水样中的阴离子(SO4-2、NO3-、Cl-和F-)含量较低,处于世卫组织指导值范围内。在冀苏和聚本的两个钻孔记录到水样中大肠菌群总数,平均值分别为2.08 × 104和3.06 × 104 CFU 100ml-1,粪便大肠菌群和大肠杆菌计数为零。在Fumesua和Bonwire的钻孔中,总大肠菌群、粪便大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的计数为零。在贝塞,只有一个钻孔记录了水样中的总大肠菌群、粪便大肠菌群和大肠杆菌。本研究选取的大多数手挖井记录的样品中大肠菌群总数、粪便大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的平均值分别为4.92 × 105、1.01 × 105和3.81 × 104 CFU 100ml-1。钻孔与手挖井总大肠菌群、粪便大肠菌群和大肠杆菌数量的平均差异极显著(p=0.001、p=0.014和p=0.001)。结论:与钻孔水相比,所有手挖井水的细菌质量都很差(超过可检测限度),因此必须在使用前进行处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling and Analyzing for Thermal Protection of Firefighters' Glove by Phase Change Material. Challenges in implementing of school-based recruitment for human biomonitoring research Occupational Exposure to Mercury in Dental Professionals Performing Mercury Dental Amalgam Restoration Removal Procedures: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Air Quality Risk Assessment Model Supported by In-Vitro Results Nesting materials may cause pneumonia-like findings in Sprague Dawley rats Screening of Selected Vegetables from Wudil, Farmlands In Kano State, Nigeria for Organophosphorus and Organochlorine Pesticide Residues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1