Railway capacity: A review of analysis methods

Melody Khadem Sameni, Arash Moradi
{"title":"Railway capacity: A review of analysis methods","authors":"Melody Khadem Sameni,&nbsp;Arash Moradi","doi":"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Railway capacity is seemingly easy but truly complex concept due to its interaction with all the pillars of railways such as infrastructure, rolling stock, signaling and operation planning. Efficient capacity utilization is critical for railways worldwide but the literature lacks a comprehensive survey. This paper for the first time summarizes major research that have been done in the past two decades with more emphasis on those that have been published since 2010. Over 60 papers have been examined and their contributions are summarized. At first, definitions of capacity are presented followed by major factors affecting capacity utilization. Capacity assessment methods are classified into 3 categories of analytical, optimization and simulation. Analytical methods include two main approaches of UIC 406 and CUI that compress the timetable to identify how much capacity is utilized. These methods have been developed further by some researchers. Optimization models define objective functions and operational constraints of railway network. These models can be solved exactly by any generic optimization software or metaheuristic methods needs to be applied if the size of model is large. Capacity analysis by simulation are mostly done by special railway software that can mimic intrinsic real world operational conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970622000579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Railway capacity is seemingly easy but truly complex concept due to its interaction with all the pillars of railways such as infrastructure, rolling stock, signaling and operation planning. Efficient capacity utilization is critical for railways worldwide but the literature lacks a comprehensive survey. This paper for the first time summarizes major research that have been done in the past two decades with more emphasis on those that have been published since 2010. Over 60 papers have been examined and their contributions are summarized. At first, definitions of capacity are presented followed by major factors affecting capacity utilization. Capacity assessment methods are classified into 3 categories of analytical, optimization and simulation. Analytical methods include two main approaches of UIC 406 and CUI that compress the timetable to identify how much capacity is utilized. These methods have been developed further by some researchers. Optimization models define objective functions and operational constraints of railway network. These models can be solved exactly by any generic optimization software or metaheuristic methods needs to be applied if the size of model is large. Capacity analysis by simulation are mostly done by special railway software that can mimic intrinsic real world operational conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铁路运力分析方法综述
铁路运力是一个看似简单但实际上非常复杂的概念,因为它与铁路的所有支柱,如基础设施、机车车辆、信号和运营规划等相互作用。有效的运力利用对世界范围内的铁路至关重要,但文献缺乏全面的调查。本文首次总结了近二十年来的主要研究成果,重点介绍了2010年以来发表的研究成果。对60多篇论文进行了审查,并对其贡献进行了总结。首先给出了容量的定义,然后给出了影响容量利用率的主要因素。容量评估方法分为分析型、优化型和仿真型三大类。分析方法包括UIC 406和CUI的两种主要方法,它们压缩时间表以确定使用了多少容量。这些方法已被一些研究人员进一步发展。优化模型定义了路网的目标函数和运行约束。这些模型可以通过任何通用优化软件精确求解,如果模型规模较大,则需要采用元启发式方法。通过仿真进行的运力分析大多是由能够模拟真实世界内在运行条件的专用铁路软件完成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
A MILP model to improve the robustness of a railway timetable by retiming and rerouting in a complex bottleneck area A decomposition approach to solve the individual railway crew Re-planning problem A Bi-objective model and a branch-and-price-and-cut solution method for the railroad blocking problem in hazardous material transportation Relationships between service quality and customer satisfaction in rail freight transportation: A structural equation modeling approach The evaluation of competition effect on rail fares using the difference-in-difference method through symmetric and lagged spans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1