Neonatal outcomes associated with obstetric interventions performed during labor in nulliparous women

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING Rev Rene Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI:10.15253/2175-6783.20212267921
Paloma Gabrielly Amorim Monteiro, Tatiane da Silva Coelho, Adriana Moreno de Lima, Uly Reis Ferreira, Maria Salete Barbosa Monteiro, Cinthia Maria Gomes da Costa Escoto Esteche, A. Damasceno
{"title":"Neonatal outcomes associated with obstetric interventions performed during labor in nulliparous women","authors":"Paloma Gabrielly Amorim Monteiro, Tatiane da Silva Coelho, Adriana Moreno de Lima, Uly Reis Ferreira, Maria Salete Barbosa Monteiro, Cinthia Maria Gomes da Costa Escoto Esteche, A. Damasceno","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.20212267921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to analyze neonatal outcomes associated with obstetric interventions performed during labor in low-risk nulliparous women. Methods: a cross-sectional observational study of 534 low-risk nulliparous women. Results: interruption of skin-to-skin contact after delivery was shown to be associated with obstetric interventions such as cardiotocography at admission, oxytocin in labor, amniotomy, and episiotomy. The need for positive pressure ventilation and oxygen therapy was associated with the encouragement of the Valsalva maneuver; the performance of this maneuver was also associated with interventions such as amniotomy, episiotomy and directed pulling. Conclusion: the study showed that the use of obstetric interventions during labor in low-risk women is associated with unfavorable neonatal outcomes that lead to the need for further interventions after delivery.","PeriodicalId":45440,"journal":{"name":"Rev Rene","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev Rene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20212267921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to analyze neonatal outcomes associated with obstetric interventions performed during labor in low-risk nulliparous women. Methods: a cross-sectional observational study of 534 low-risk nulliparous women. Results: interruption of skin-to-skin contact after delivery was shown to be associated with obstetric interventions such as cardiotocography at admission, oxytocin in labor, amniotomy, and episiotomy. The need for positive pressure ventilation and oxygen therapy was associated with the encouragement of the Valsalva maneuver; the performance of this maneuver was also associated with interventions such as amniotomy, episiotomy and directed pulling. Conclusion: the study showed that the use of obstetric interventions during labor in low-risk women is associated with unfavorable neonatal outcomes that lead to the need for further interventions after delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿结局与产妇分娩期间进行的产科干预有关
目的:分析低危无产妇女分娩过程中产科干预的新生儿结局。方法:对534例低危无产妇女进行横断面观察研究。结果:分娩后皮肤接触中断与产科干预措施有关,如入院时的心脏造影、分娩时的催产素、羊膜切开和会阴切开术。正压通气和氧疗的需要与Valsalva手法的鼓励有关;这种手法的表现也与羊膜切开术、会阴切开术和定向牵拉等干预措施有关。结论:该研究表明,低风险妇女在分娩期间使用产科干预措施与不利的新生儿结局相关,导致分娩后需要进一步干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rev Rene
Rev Rene NURSING-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Shift work disorder among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia Mortality from HIV/AIDS in adolescents and young adults: a temporal time series University Open to Older People: factors associated with the use of information and communication technologies Sleep quality and burnout in higher education teachers Nursing interventions for fall prevention in hospitalized aged people: an integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1