Directing and Differentiating First-Graders’ Historical Reading, Thinking, and Writing about Abraham Lincoln

J. Bickford
{"title":"Directing and Differentiating First-Graders’ Historical Reading, Thinking, and Writing about Abraham Lincoln","authors":"J. Bickford","doi":"10.1080/00377996.2022.2034730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract First-grader students engaged in a guided historical inquiry about Abraham Lincoln. The teacher carefully intertwined historical content, close reading, critical thinking, and text-based writing during Reading, Writing, and Social Studies classes. Students scrutinized secondary sources, which were largely biographies of Lincoln, to build their historical schemas. The first-graders analyzed primary sources—which were intentionally selected to mitigate historical gaps within secondary sources—in order to establish historical significance and make intertextual connections. Students formulated emerging historical understandings through extemporaneous text-based writing, which were later used to draft, revise, and resubmit expository essays. Students’ verbal contributions were far more nuanced than written communications, which their budding fine-motor writing skills limited. Children exhibited critical and historical thinking during whole-class classroom dialogue, small-group discussion, and individual interactions, such as when asked to clarify their writing. Students completed an age-appropriate adaptation of informed action. Teachers and research can gain rich, nuanced understandings from close examinations of students’ reading, writing, and thinking.","PeriodicalId":83074,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","volume":"69 1","pages":"195 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2022.2034730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract First-grader students engaged in a guided historical inquiry about Abraham Lincoln. The teacher carefully intertwined historical content, close reading, critical thinking, and text-based writing during Reading, Writing, and Social Studies classes. Students scrutinized secondary sources, which were largely biographies of Lincoln, to build their historical schemas. The first-graders analyzed primary sources—which were intentionally selected to mitigate historical gaps within secondary sources—in order to establish historical significance and make intertextual connections. Students formulated emerging historical understandings through extemporaneous text-based writing, which were later used to draft, revise, and resubmit expository essays. Students’ verbal contributions were far more nuanced than written communications, which their budding fine-motor writing skills limited. Children exhibited critical and historical thinking during whole-class classroom dialogue, small-group discussion, and individual interactions, such as when asked to clarify their writing. Students completed an age-appropriate adaptation of informed action. Teachers and research can gain rich, nuanced understandings from close examinations of students’ reading, writing, and thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指导和区分一年级学生对亚伯拉罕·林肯的历史阅读、思考和写作
一年级学生参与了一项关于亚伯拉罕·林肯的历史探究。在阅读、写作和社会研究课程中,老师精心地将历史内容、细读、批判性思维和基于文本的写作结合在一起。学生们仔细研究二手资料,其中大部分是林肯的传记,以建立他们的历史图式。一年级学生分析一手资料——有意选择这些资料以减轻二手资料中的历史空白——以确立历史意义并建立互文联系。学生们通过即兴的基于文本的写作来形成新兴的历史理解,这些理解后来被用来起草、修改和重新提交说明性文章。学生们的口头表达要比书面交流细致得多,因为他们刚刚萌芽的精细写作技能限制了书面交流。孩子们在课堂对话、小组讨论和个人互动中表现出批判性和历史思维,比如当被要求澄清他们的写作时。学生们完成了与年龄相适应的知情行动。教师和研究人员可以从对学生阅读、写作和思考的仔细检查中获得丰富而细致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using SOURCES to Examine and Understand Immigrants’ Journeys to the United States through Ellis Island Preservice Teachers’ Written Responses to Refugee Experiences in a Graphic Novel Reimagining the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Portal to Justice for Asian American Students Inquiry Island - The Prequel: A Critical Ecological Social Studies Experience Teaching Resistance With Primary Sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1