Whānau, Tikanga and Tino Rangatiratanga: What is at stake in the debate over the Ministry for Children?

Q1 Social Sciences MAI Journal Pub Date : 2020-07-29 DOI:10.20507/maijournal.2019.9.2.7
Luke Fitzmaurice
{"title":"Whānau, Tikanga and Tino Rangatiratanga: What is at stake in the debate over the Ministry for Children?","authors":"Luke Fitzmaurice","doi":"10.20507/maijournal.2019.9.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The removal of a Mäori child in May 2019 led to widespread protest and the launch of four inquiries into the Ministry for Children, plus an urgent inquiry through the Waitangi Tribunal. Tamariki Mäori are overrepresented in the child welfare system, but the issues are not just about the system itself. The legacy of colonisation continues to have an impact, not just on individual whänau, but also on the loss of tikanga in relation to whänau. It is the tikanga of whänau that many protesters seek to protect. Furthermore, advocates for reform disagree on the extent to which partnership and biculturalism should be prioritised, or whether selfdetermination should be a minimum prerequisite for change. Understanding this difference of opinion is important because it affects our view of the child welfare system itself. This article explores these issues within the current context, where child welfare issues are a matter of considerable public debate.","PeriodicalId":36901,"journal":{"name":"MAI Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20507/maijournal.2019.9.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The removal of a Mäori child in May 2019 led to widespread protest and the launch of four inquiries into the Ministry for Children, plus an urgent inquiry through the Waitangi Tribunal. Tamariki Mäori are overrepresented in the child welfare system, but the issues are not just about the system itself. The legacy of colonisation continues to have an impact, not just on individual whänau, but also on the loss of tikanga in relation to whänau. It is the tikanga of whänau that many protesters seek to protect. Furthermore, advocates for reform disagree on the extent to which partnership and biculturalism should be prioritised, or whether selfdetermination should be a minimum prerequisite for change. Understanding this difference of opinion is important because it affects our view of the child welfare system itself. This article explores these issues within the current context, where child welfare issues are a matter of considerable public debate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whānau, Tikanga和Tino Rangatiratanga:关于儿童部的争论有什么利害关系?
2019年5月,一名Mäori儿童被驱逐出境引发了广泛抗议,并对儿童事务部发起了四次调查,并通过怀唐伊法庭进行了紧急调查。Tamariki Mäori在儿童福利系统中有过多的代表,但问题不仅仅是系统本身。殖民的遗产继续产生影响,不仅对个人whänau,而且对tikanga的丧失whänau也有影响。的tikanga whanau,许多抗议者寻求保护。此外,改革的倡导者在伙伴关系和双文化主义应该优先考虑的程度上存在分歧,或者自决是否应该是变革的最低先决条件。理解这种不同的观点是很重要的,因为它会影响我们对儿童福利制度本身的看法。这篇文章探讨了这些问题在当前的背景下,儿童福利问题是一个相当大的公众辩论的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MAI Journal
MAI Journal Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The design and operation of post-settlement governance entities. A management contribution Pacific peoples, New Zealand housing-related political rhetoric and epistemic violence Taiao and Mauri Ora. Māori understandings of the environment and its connection to wellbeing High-achieving Māori students' perceptions of their best and worst teachers Te Kupenga. A woven methodology for collecting, interpreting, and stor(y)ing Māori women’s knowledges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1