Re-framing conceptual metaphor translation research in the age of neural machine translation: Investigating translators’ added value with products and processes

G. Massey
{"title":"Re-framing conceptual metaphor translation research in the age of neural machine translation: Investigating translators’ added value with products and processes","authors":"G. Massey","doi":"10.22363/2521-442X-2021-5-1-37-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"36 Training, Language and Culture Training, Language and Culture 37 © Gary Massey 2021 This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License The exploratory study reported in this article is predicated on the notion that human translators’ cognition represents a key added value over disembodied artificial intelligence. It re-frames the methods, data and results of a precursor study, and supplements them with additional data and analyses to develop a new cognitive perspective on re-positioning human translation competence and translators’ expertise in the age of neural machine translation (NMT). The study is centred on an investigation of culturally specific complex conceptual metaphor in translation, and it melds a more conventional product-oriented approach with experimental translation process research (TPR). It indicates that human translators’ decision-making and problem-solving at different levels of training and experience take place on a conceptual level. Compared with the translations of the same metaphors by publicly available NMT systems and by beginners as well as more advanced students, the product data of the professionals involved in the study produce more varied translation solutions, with a range of deviations from the standardised output. This suggests that, after accessing the conceptual level of meaning realised in a particular lexical form, experienced professionals, as a group, are able to generate multiple potential target-text solutions in order to reach their target audience. The supplementary process data indicates that they do so situationally, based on 4EA cognition, through intuition and/or deliberative rationality. It is this, the author argues, that is the distinguishing feature of seasoned professional translators and a hallmark of their added value.","PeriodicalId":36167,"journal":{"name":"Training, Language and Culture","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Training, Language and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2021-5-1-37-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

36 Training, Language and Culture Training, Language and Culture 37 © Gary Massey 2021 This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License The exploratory study reported in this article is predicated on the notion that human translators’ cognition represents a key added value over disembodied artificial intelligence. It re-frames the methods, data and results of a precursor study, and supplements them with additional data and analyses to develop a new cognitive perspective on re-positioning human translation competence and translators’ expertise in the age of neural machine translation (NMT). The study is centred on an investigation of culturally specific complex conceptual metaphor in translation, and it melds a more conventional product-oriented approach with experimental translation process research (TPR). It indicates that human translators’ decision-making and problem-solving at different levels of training and experience take place on a conceptual level. Compared with the translations of the same metaphors by publicly available NMT systems and by beginners as well as more advanced students, the product data of the professionals involved in the study produce more varied translation solutions, with a range of deviations from the standardised output. This suggests that, after accessing the conceptual level of meaning realised in a particular lexical form, experienced professionals, as a group, are able to generate multiple potential target-text solutions in order to reach their target audience. The supplementary process data indicates that they do so situationally, based on 4EA cognition, through intuition and/or deliberative rationality. It is this, the author argues, that is the distinguishing feature of seasoned professional translators and a hallmark of their added value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经机器翻译时代概念隐喻翻译研究的重构:考察译者的产品和过程附加价值
培训,语言与文化培训,语言与文化©Gary Massey 2021本内容采用知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议授权。本文中报道的探索性研究基于这样一种观点,即人类译者的认知能力代表了相对于无实体的人工智能的关键附加值。本文重新构建了前人研究的方法、数据和结果,并补充了额外的数据和分析,以建立一个新的认知视角来重新定位神经机器翻译时代的人类翻译能力和译者的专业知识。本研究将传统的以产品为导向的研究方法与实验翻译过程研究(TPR)相结合,重点研究翻译中具有文化特殊性的复杂概念隐喻。这表明,在不同的训练和经验水平下,人类译者的决策和解决问题的过程发生在概念层面。与公开可用的NMT系统以及初学者和更高级的学生对相同隐喻的翻译相比,参与研究的专业人员的产品数据产生了更多样化的翻译解决方案,与标准化输出有一系列偏差。这表明,经验丰富的专业人士作为一个群体,在获得以特定词汇形式实现的概念层面的意义后,能够产生多种潜在的目标文本解决方案,以达到他们的目标受众。补充过程数据表明,他们是基于4EA认知,通过直觉和/或审慎理性,情境性地这样做的。作者认为,这是经验丰富的专业翻译人员的显著特征,也是他们附加值的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Training, Language and Culture
Training, Language and Culture Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Code switching patterns in Kazakh-Russian hybrid language practice: An empirical study Hikikomori and Sōshokukei-danshi: A semantic analysis of Japan’s social deviants Russian culture through the prism of English, Finnish and Japanese languages: Reflections or refractions? Empirical application of sentiment analysis and emotions in Spanish: A post-cognitivist approach French medical memes: Themes, language, functions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1