Comparative evaluation between KOH and PAS stain of fungal examination result on lung Tuberculosis patients’ sputum with positive Ziehl-Neelsen stain

R. Kusumawati, E. Wasito, A. P. Kawilarang, E. Koendhori
{"title":"Comparative evaluation between KOH and PAS stain of fungal examination result on lung Tuberculosis patients’ sputum with positive Ziehl-Neelsen stain","authors":"R. Kusumawati, E. Wasito, A. P. Kawilarang, E. Koendhori","doi":"10.30651/jqm.v7i2.18606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mycosis is often misdiagnosed as Tuberculosis (TB) with negative sputum smear results or Tuberculosis recurrent. In the last two-decade, mycosis increases dramatically as HIV and immunocompromised incidence rates increased. Even though, the prevalence data of mycosis in TB patient is less researched, the identification using KOH often give a false negative result. To compare the result of fungal identification using KOH and PAS staining. This study is observational analytical using a cross-sectional design with 29 TB samples that have been diagnosed with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain positive in RSUD Dr. Soetomo. The sputum of every sample was colored with KOH and PAS and observed by the researcher and microbiology analyst. The results of this study were 22 sputa identified with Candida sp positive and 12 sputa with non-Candida positive using KOH staining. Meanwhile, using PAS staining, there were 25 sputa identified as Candida sp positive and 22 sputa as non-Candida positive. The congruency test between KOH and PAS has a fair result for both identifying Candida sp (κ = 0.298; significance = 0.069) and non-Candida (κ = 0.240; significance = 0.095). The identification of candida and non-candida in TB patients using KOH and PAS has a fair congruency result. The PAS staining has better identification results both in identifying candida and non-candida rather than KOH staining. ","PeriodicalId":31682,"journal":{"name":"Qanun Medika Jurnal Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qanun Medika Jurnal Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30651/jqm.v7i2.18606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycosis is often misdiagnosed as Tuberculosis (TB) with negative sputum smear results or Tuberculosis recurrent. In the last two-decade, mycosis increases dramatically as HIV and immunocompromised incidence rates increased. Even though, the prevalence data of mycosis in TB patient is less researched, the identification using KOH often give a false negative result. To compare the result of fungal identification using KOH and PAS staining. This study is observational analytical using a cross-sectional design with 29 TB samples that have been diagnosed with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) stain positive in RSUD Dr. Soetomo. The sputum of every sample was colored with KOH and PAS and observed by the researcher and microbiology analyst. The results of this study were 22 sputa identified with Candida sp positive and 12 sputa with non-Candida positive using KOH staining. Meanwhile, using PAS staining, there were 25 sputa identified as Candida sp positive and 22 sputa as non-Candida positive. The congruency test between KOH and PAS has a fair result for both identifying Candida sp (κ = 0.298; significance = 0.069) and non-Candida (κ = 0.240; significance = 0.095). The identification of candida and non-candida in TB patients using KOH and PAS has a fair congruency result. The PAS staining has better identification results both in identifying candida and non-candida rather than KOH staining. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ziehl-Neelsen染色阳性肺结核患者痰真菌检查结果KOH与PAS染色的比较评价
霉菌病经常被误诊为结核(TB),痰涂片结果阴性或结核复发。在过去二十年中,随着艾滋病毒和免疫功能低下发病率的增加,真菌病急剧增加。尽管结核患者中真菌病的患病率数据研究较少,但使用KOH进行鉴定往往会产生假阴性结果。比较KOH和PAS染色真菌鉴定结果。本研究采用横断面设计对29例被诊断为RSUD Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN)染色阳性的TB样本进行观察分析。每个样本的痰液用KOH和PAS染色,由研究人员和微生物分析人员观察。结果22例痰液经KOH染色检出念珠菌阳性,12例痰液检出非念珠菌阳性。同时,经PAS染色,25个痰液为念珠菌阳性,22个痰液为非念珠菌阳性。KOH与PAS的一致性检验对假丝酵母sp (κ = 0.298;显著性= 0.069)和非念珠菌(κ = 0.240;显著性= 0.095)。KOH和PAS对结核患者假丝酵母菌和非假丝酵母菌的鉴别结果具有相当的一致性。PAS染色对假丝酵母和非假丝酵母的鉴别结果均优于KOH染色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Unusual Laryngeal Foreign Body in Adult: Denture CRISPR-Cas9 through AAV delivery system as a gene therapy in Parkinson’s disease An overview of anxiety levels of Muhammadiyah citizens against COVID-19 vaccination in Surabaya Relationship of genetic factors to the degree of Acne vulgaris as one of the predisposing factors in student Faculty of Medicine University of Muhammadiyah Malang Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Aspergillus in COVID-19 patients in Jakarta: A challenge in the pandemic commotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1