Perception of Healthcare Providers in Agile Environment Imposed by the COVID-19

Najwa Alfarra, Nouf Aldhawyan, Sammah Alharbi, Mohammed Sheeha
{"title":"Perception of Healthcare Providers in Agile Environment Imposed by the COVID-19","authors":"Najwa Alfarra, Nouf Aldhawyan, Sammah Alharbi, Mohammed Sheeha","doi":"10.31579/2693-4779/027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Nearly nine months have passed since the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused the rapidly spreading Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In Saudi Arabia, unprecedented precautionary strict measures were applied to prevent virus entry to the country or to mitigate its impact when it arrives. The physical rehabilitation is the 3rd largest profession in the area of healthcare and is the most representative profession in the area of rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia. Physical rehabilitation services provide the development, maintenance, and recovery of people’s movement and functional ability, improving their quality of life. In this way, many hospitalized patients in the acute phase of COVID-19, as well as chronic patients, need physical rehabilitation services. This study aimed to determine the number of therapists/ clinicians who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the therapists/clinicians to continue serving and supporting their patients. METHODS The sample comprised 46 therapists/clinicians who worked in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), 19 (41.4%) males and 27 (58.6%) females. The measurement instrument was an on-line survey questionnaire applied mid-July to mid-August 2020 through email. The questionnaires consisted of four primary sections. The first section gathered information on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The second section assessed respondents ' years of professional experience and area of specialty. The third section assessed respondents ' work load on daily bases pre/post COVID-19 crisis. The final section of the questionnaire assessed the benefits and barriers of telehealth, therapist opinion about how was the department/organization handled this pandemic issue, and to add their recommendation to improve the service. RESULTS Out of the 46 therapists/clinicians, 37 (80.4%) interrupted their work activities because of the pandemic and 9 (19.6%) continue with the existing daily practice. The number of patients seen/day before pandemic decreased compare to pre pandemic by21.7%, in arrange of 15 patients/day to zero patient/day by 26.1%, that led to change the way of therapists daily practice such as seven therapists shifted their clinics to virtual clinics, and almost most of the therapists (n= 32) continue working in inpatient ward, taking in their considerations the main measures that was adopted by the organization, when they deal with the direct patient contact which included: hand washing, mask use, material disinfection and gloves. The three administrative respondents work on quality issues, managerial guidelines and research. While the four orthotics/ prosthetics clinicians shifted their work to fabricate medical supportive devices to be used for the patients. Seven therapists shift their clinics to virtual visits, and they found it very convenient to the patients. CONCLUSIONS Our result revealed that most of the therapists/clinicians interrupted their regular work , impact number patient seen per day and face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, due to several reason such as spread of infection and the patients are afraid to come and they cancelled their appointment, however, half of the respondents continue with their existing work and taking into their considerations the measured that were adapted by the organization, the others who did not follow up their patients’ treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance by using virtual visits.","PeriodicalId":8525,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Nearly nine months have passed since the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused the rapidly spreading Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In Saudi Arabia, unprecedented precautionary strict measures were applied to prevent virus entry to the country or to mitigate its impact when it arrives. The physical rehabilitation is the 3rd largest profession in the area of healthcare and is the most representative profession in the area of rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia. Physical rehabilitation services provide the development, maintenance, and recovery of people’s movement and functional ability, improving their quality of life. In this way, many hospitalized patients in the acute phase of COVID-19, as well as chronic patients, need physical rehabilitation services. This study aimed to determine the number of therapists/ clinicians who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the therapists/clinicians to continue serving and supporting their patients. METHODS The sample comprised 46 therapists/clinicians who worked in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), 19 (41.4%) males and 27 (58.6%) females. The measurement instrument was an on-line survey questionnaire applied mid-July to mid-August 2020 through email. The questionnaires consisted of four primary sections. The first section gathered information on respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The second section assessed respondents ' years of professional experience and area of specialty. The third section assessed respondents ' work load on daily bases pre/post COVID-19 crisis. The final section of the questionnaire assessed the benefits and barriers of telehealth, therapist opinion about how was the department/organization handled this pandemic issue, and to add their recommendation to improve the service. RESULTS Out of the 46 therapists/clinicians, 37 (80.4%) interrupted their work activities because of the pandemic and 9 (19.6%) continue with the existing daily practice. The number of patients seen/day before pandemic decreased compare to pre pandemic by21.7%, in arrange of 15 patients/day to zero patient/day by 26.1%, that led to change the way of therapists daily practice such as seven therapists shifted their clinics to virtual clinics, and almost most of the therapists (n= 32) continue working in inpatient ward, taking in their considerations the main measures that was adopted by the organization, when they deal with the direct patient contact which included: hand washing, mask use, material disinfection and gloves. The three administrative respondents work on quality issues, managerial guidelines and research. While the four orthotics/ prosthetics clinicians shifted their work to fabricate medical supportive devices to be used for the patients. Seven therapists shift their clinics to virtual visits, and they found it very convenient to the patients. CONCLUSIONS Our result revealed that most of the therapists/clinicians interrupted their regular work , impact number patient seen per day and face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, due to several reason such as spread of infection and the patients are afraid to come and they cancelled their appointment, however, half of the respondents continue with their existing work and taking into their considerations the measured that were adapted by the organization, the others who did not follow up their patients’ treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance by using virtual visits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19对敏捷环境中医疗保健提供者的看法
自导致快速传播的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的严重急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)出现以来,已经过去了近9个月。在沙特阿拉伯,采取了前所未有的严格预防措施,以防止病毒进入该国,或在病毒到达时减轻其影响。身体康复是医疗保健领域的第三大专业,也是沙特阿拉伯康复领域最具代表性的专业。肢体康复服务提供人们的运动和功能的发展、维持和恢复,提高他们的生活质量。因此,许多新冠肺炎急性期住院患者以及慢性患者都需要身体康复服务。本研究旨在确定因COVID-19大流行而中断服务的治疗师/临床医生的数量,并验证治疗师/临床医生为继续服务和支持患者而采取的程序。方法选取费萨尔国王专科医院和研究中心(KFSH&RC)的46名治疗师/临床医生,其中男性19人(41.4%),女性27人(58.6%)。测量工具为2020年7月中旬至8月中旬通过电子邮件申请的在线调查问卷。问卷由四个主要部分组成。第一部分收集了受访者的社会人口特征信息。第二部分评估受访者的专业经验年数和专业领域。第三部分评估了受访者在COVID-19危机前后的日常工作量。调查表的最后一部分评估了远程保健的好处和障碍,治疗师对部门/组织如何处理这一流行病问题的意见,并提出了改进服务的建议。结果46名临床治疗师/临床医生中,37名(80.4%)因疫情中断工作,9名(19.6%)继续进行日常工作。与大流行前相比,大流行前每天就诊的患者数量减少了21.7%,从每天15例患者减少到每天零例患者,减少了26.1%,这导致治疗师改变了日常实践方式,例如7名治疗师将其诊所转移到虚拟诊所,几乎大多数治疗师(n= 32)继续在住院病房工作,考虑到组织采取的主要措施。当他们处理与病人的直接接触时,包括:洗手、使用口罩、材料消毒和手套。三名行政应答者负责质量问题、管理指导方针和研究。而四位矫形/修复临床医生将他们的工作转移到制造用于患者的医疗支持设备上。七名治疗师将他们的诊所改为虚拟就诊,他们发现这对病人来说非常方便。结论:由于感染传播、患者不敢来就诊、取消预约等原因,大多数治疗师/临床医生因COVID-19大流行中断了日常工作,影响了每天就诊的患者数量和面对面的实践,然而,一半的受访者在考虑到组织调整的测量结果后,继续他们现有的工作。其他没有亲自跟进病人治疗的人,他们中的大多数都适应了通过虚拟访问从远处监控病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Analysis of Efficacy and Toxicidad of Zoledroinic Acid in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Baseline Assessments of Tb Detection Centres in Selected Public and Private Laboratories in India and Need for Introducing Quality Management Systems An Uncommon Cause of Palpitations Prevalence and Correlates of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Cam) Use Among Hypertensive Patients in Tamale, Ghana Electroacupuncture in The Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1