Comparison of field performance and fruit quality among newly released Italian June-bearing strawberry cultivars

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2298/jas2302201m
J. Milivojevic, D. Radivojevic, D. Milosavljevic, V. Maksimović, J. Dragisic-Maksimovic
{"title":"Comparison of field performance and fruit quality among newly released Italian June-bearing strawberry cultivars","authors":"J. Milivojevic, D. Radivojevic, D. Milosavljevic, V. Maksimović, J. Dragisic-Maksimovic","doi":"10.2298/jas2302201m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare newly released June-bearing strawberry cultivars (?Quicky?, ?Sandra?, ?Lofty?, ?Nadja? and ?Aprica?) in terms of their phenology, vegetative growth, productivity and fruit quality to identify their potential for wider cultivation. A field study was conducted in a strawberry plantation established in July 2020 in double rows on beds covered with black polyethylene foil (Sid, Serbia). The cultivars were evaluated in 2021-2022 for their flowering and ripening time, productivity, plant growth, biometrical and nutritional fruit traits (soluble solids content - SSC, total acids - TAs, vitamin C, total anthocyanins - TACY, total phenolics - TPC and total antioxidant capacity - TAC). The cultivar ?Quicky? started to ripen earliest, while ?Aprica? was the latest in both experimental years. The number of branch crowns per plant was significantly higher in ?Sandra? and ?Lofty?, whereby ?Sandra? had also the highest number of leaves per rosette (41.5) in comparison with the other tested cultivars. The cultivar ?Aprica? was superior in terms of productivity (1061 g/plant and 4.67 kg/m2), fruit weight (29.9 g) and fruit shape index (1.15). Contrary to this, ?Nadja? was the least productive cultivar (608 g/plant and 2.68 kg/m2). The cultivars ?Lofty? and ?Sandra? showed the highest SSC values and were also characterized by a considerably high level of TPC (1.29 mg GAE eq g-1 FW) and TACY (24.4 mg pg-3-g eq 100 g-1 FW), respectively. Variability among the tested cultivars could serve as an important criterion for the selection of new high-performing cultivars for a given growing region.","PeriodicalId":14882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/jas2302201m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare newly released June-bearing strawberry cultivars (?Quicky?, ?Sandra?, ?Lofty?, ?Nadja? and ?Aprica?) in terms of their phenology, vegetative growth, productivity and fruit quality to identify their potential for wider cultivation. A field study was conducted in a strawberry plantation established in July 2020 in double rows on beds covered with black polyethylene foil (Sid, Serbia). The cultivars were evaluated in 2021-2022 for their flowering and ripening time, productivity, plant growth, biometrical and nutritional fruit traits (soluble solids content - SSC, total acids - TAs, vitamin C, total anthocyanins - TACY, total phenolics - TPC and total antioxidant capacity - TAC). The cultivar ?Quicky? started to ripen earliest, while ?Aprica? was the latest in both experimental years. The number of branch crowns per plant was significantly higher in ?Sandra? and ?Lofty?, whereby ?Sandra? had also the highest number of leaves per rosette (41.5) in comparison with the other tested cultivars. The cultivar ?Aprica? was superior in terms of productivity (1061 g/plant and 4.67 kg/m2), fruit weight (29.9 g) and fruit shape index (1.15). Contrary to this, ?Nadja? was the least productive cultivar (608 g/plant and 2.68 kg/m2). The cultivars ?Lofty? and ?Sandra? showed the highest SSC values and were also characterized by a considerably high level of TPC (1.29 mg GAE eq g-1 FW) and TACY (24.4 mg pg-3-g eq 100 g-1 FW), respectively. Variability among the tested cultivars could serve as an important criterion for the selection of new high-performing cultivars for a given growing region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利6月草莓新品种田间性能和果实品质比较
本研究的目的是比较新发布的六月草莓品种(?快?桑德拉?崇高?娜迪亚?在物候、营养生长、生产力和果实质量方面,以确定其广泛种植的潜力。在2020年7月建立的草莓种植园进行了一项实地研究,该种植园采用双排种植方式,床上覆盖黑色聚乙烯箔(塞尔维亚锡德)。在2021-2022年对这些品种的开花和成熟时间、生产力、植株生长、生物计量和营养性状(可溶性固形物含量- SSC、总酸- TAs、维生素C、总花青素- TACY、总酚类物质- TPC和总抗氧化能力- TAC)进行了评价。品种?快?最早开始成熟,而非洲?是两个实验年份中最晚的。单株枝冠数显著高于桑德拉?和崇高?桑德拉?每莲座叶数也最高,为41.5片。那个品种?非洲?在产量(1061 g/株,4.67 kg/m2)、果重(29.9 g)和果形指数(1.15)方面均具有优势。与此相反,娜佳?产量最低(608 g/株,2.68 kg/m2)。品种?高大的?和桑德拉?SSC值最高,TPC (1.29 mg GAE eq g-1 FW)和TACY (24.4 mg pg-3-g eq 100 g-1 FW)含量也相当高。供试品种间的变异可作为特定产区选育高产新品种的重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and perspectives of the North Macedonian dairy industry Effect of compost with banana peel and Moringa leaf powders on seed yield and yield components of green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) Comparative evaluation of the productivity of winter crops (wheat [Triticum aestivum L.], rye [Secale cereale L.], triticale [Triticosecale Witt.]) in the western forest-steppe of Ukraine Nutritive value of field pea - oat and common vetch - oat bicrops Application of sodium selenite in the growing technology of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1