13C-octanoic acid breath test for measurement of solid gastric emptying: reproducibility in normal subjects and patients with diabetes mellitus

F. Bo, D. Ziegler
{"title":"13C-octanoic acid breath test for measurement of solid gastric emptying: reproducibility in normal subjects and patients with diabetes mellitus","authors":"F. Bo, D. Ziegler","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-9780.2001.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To examine the intraindividual reproducibility of the octanoic acid breath test in normal subjects and diabetics and to investigate whether cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and delayed gastric emptying influence the intraindividual reproducibility.Methods Nine normal subjects (six men, three women,mean age 38 years) and 15 diabetics with insulin treatment [nine men, six women; mean age 47 years; six had cardiovascular autonomic diabetic neuropathy (CADN) and/or delayed gastric emptying time] were, after a nocturnal fasting period, given a standard test meal (labeled with 13C-octanoic acid, 1 046 kJ). Breath samples were taken at ten minute intervals over first one hour and at fifteen minute intervals over the following three hours and examined for 13CO 2 by isotope ratio infrared spectrometry. Using a regression method gastric emptying half times (t 1/2) and lag phase (t lag) were determined.Results There was not a significant difference of t 1/2 and t lag between two measurements in normal subjects and diabetics. The coefficients of variation of day-to-day reproducibility were 11.7% for t 1/2, 19.4% for t lag in normal subjects and 17.8% for t 1/2, 28.2% for t lag in diabetics, but there was not significant difference between normal subjects and diabetics. There was not significant difference of intraindividual coefficient of variation of t 1/2 and t lag between diabetics with/without CADN and between diabetics with normal gastric emptying time and diabetics with delayed gastric emptying time.Conclusions The 13C-octanoic acid breath test has a high intraindividual reproducibility which is not affected by the cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and delayed gastric emptying. It can be recommended as a non-invasive test for assessing gastric emptying time after a solid test meal in diabetics.","PeriodicalId":10073,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"107-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-9780.2001.02.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To examine the intraindividual reproducibility of the octanoic acid breath test in normal subjects and diabetics and to investigate whether cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and delayed gastric emptying influence the intraindividual reproducibility.Methods Nine normal subjects (six men, three women,mean age 38 years) and 15 diabetics with insulin treatment [nine men, six women; mean age 47 years; six had cardiovascular autonomic diabetic neuropathy (CADN) and/or delayed gastric emptying time] were, after a nocturnal fasting period, given a standard test meal (labeled with 13C-octanoic acid, 1 046 kJ). Breath samples were taken at ten minute intervals over first one hour and at fifteen minute intervals over the following three hours and examined for 13CO 2 by isotope ratio infrared spectrometry. Using a regression method gastric emptying half times (t 1/2) and lag phase (t lag) were determined.Results There was not a significant difference of t 1/2 and t lag between two measurements in normal subjects and diabetics. The coefficients of variation of day-to-day reproducibility were 11.7% for t 1/2, 19.4% for t lag in normal subjects and 17.8% for t 1/2, 28.2% for t lag in diabetics, but there was not significant difference between normal subjects and diabetics. There was not significant difference of intraindividual coefficient of variation of t 1/2 and t lag between diabetics with/without CADN and between diabetics with normal gastric emptying time and diabetics with delayed gastric emptying time.Conclusions The 13C-octanoic acid breath test has a high intraindividual reproducibility which is not affected by the cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and delayed gastric emptying. It can be recommended as a non-invasive test for assessing gastric emptying time after a solid test meal in diabetics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
13c -辛酸呼气试验测定固体胃排空:在正常人和糖尿病患者中的重复性
目的探讨辛酸呼吸试验在正常人和糖尿病患者体内的重复性,并探讨心血管自主神经病变和胃排空延迟是否会影响辛酸呼吸试验在体内的重复性。方法9例正常人(男6例,女3例,平均年龄38岁)和15例接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者[男9例,女6例;平均年龄47岁;6例患有心血管自主糖尿病神经病变(CADN)和/或胃排空时间延迟],在夜间禁食后给予标准试验餐(标记13c -辛酸,1 046 kJ)。呼吸样本在前一小时内每隔10分钟采集一次,在接下来的三小时内每隔15分钟采集一次,并通过同位素比红外光谱法检测13CO 2。采用回归法测定胃排空半次(t 1/2)和滞后期(t lag)。结果正常受试者与糖尿病患者两次测量的t 1/2和t滞后性无显著差异。正常组t 1/2日重复性变异系数为11.7%、19.4%,糖尿病组t 1/2日重复性变异系数为17.8%、28.2%,正常组与糖尿病组无显著差异。有无CADN的糖尿病患者、胃排空时间正常的糖尿病患者与胃排空时间延迟的糖尿病患者的t1 /2和t滞后的个体内变异系数差异无统计学意义。结论13c -辛酸呼气试验具有较高的个体内重复性,不受心血管自主神经病变和胃排空延迟的影响。它可以作为一种非侵入性的测试,用于评估糖尿病患者固体试验餐后的胃排空时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The preliminary biocharacteristic study of a potential dopamine D_3 receptor imaging agent, ~(125) I-7-OH-PIPAT 13C-octanoic acid breath test for measurement of solid gastric emptying: reproducibility in normal subjects and patients with diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1