Not a Bare Permission

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Journal of Reformed Theology Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1163/15697312-bja10040
Sean Luke
{"title":"Not a Bare Permission","authors":"Sean Luke","doi":"10.1163/15697312-bja10040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n How does God ordain creaturely evil while preserving their freedom? In this article, I compare Calvin’s views on God’s relationship to evil with those of the English Reformed. I survey Calvin’s views from his commentaries and the Institutes, arguing that they share several salient features with the views of the English Reformed. However, I also note that the English Reformed more readily use the language of “contingency” and “divine permission” with respect to creaturely evil; this difference is reflected in the language of Westminster, which more closely reflects the language of the English Reformed instead of Calvin.","PeriodicalId":53817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reformed Theology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reformed Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15697312-bja10040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How does God ordain creaturely evil while preserving their freedom? In this article, I compare Calvin’s views on God’s relationship to evil with those of the English Reformed. I survey Calvin’s views from his commentaries and the Institutes, arguing that they share several salient features with the views of the English Reformed. However, I also note that the English Reformed more readily use the language of “contingency” and “divine permission” with respect to creaturely evil; this difference is reflected in the language of Westminster, which more closely reflects the language of the English Reformed instead of Calvin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非裸权限
上帝是如何在保护人类自由的同时,命定邪恶的?在这篇文章中,我将加尔文关于上帝与邪恶关系的观点与英国改革宗的观点进行比较。我从加尔文的注释和《要旨》中考察他的观点,认为他们与英国改革宗的观点有几个显著的共同点。然而,我也注意到,英国改革宗更倾向于使用“偶然性”和“神的许可”这样的语言来描述受造之恶;这种差异反映在威斯敏斯特的语言上,它更接近地反映了英国改革宗的语言,而不是加尔文的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Idealism and Edwards the Preacher Synchronic Contingency: A Useful Concept for Reformed Theology A Hopeless Hodge-Podge of Theology?: The Retrieval of “Classical Theism” and the Curious Case of Charles Hodge The Relationship between Theological Prolegomena and Imago Dei: A Reformed Analysis of Evangelical Systematic Theology Prelapsarian Christological Mediation and the Typology of Adam and Eve in Jerome Zanchi’s De Operibus Dei
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1