Model Minority Discourse and Asian American Jouis-Sense

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies Pub Date : 1999-06-01 DOI:10.1215/10407391-11-2-228
Tomo Hattori
{"title":"Model Minority Discourse and Asian American Jouis-Sense","authors":"Tomo Hattori","doi":"10.1215/10407391-11-2-228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asian American literature begins, for the moment, with two Anglo-Chinese Canadian sisters. Over the last decade, Asian Americanist scholars Amy Ling and Annette White-Parks have established Edith Maude Eaton (1865–1914) and (Lillie) Winnifred Eaton (1875–1954) as the first Asian North American writers of fiction (Ling, Between 21; Ling, “Creating” 306; Ling and White-Parks 1). The two founders, however, have not been equally appreciated. Asian American criticism tends to see Edith Eaton, who adopted the Chinese pseudonym Sui Sin Far and who wrote sympathetically about Chinese immigrants, as a conscientious social critic. Winnifred Eaton, on the other hand, who wrote under the fabricated Japanese pseudonym Onoto Watanna and enjoyed a successful career writing popular orientalia, is regarded as a sellout and a race traitor.1 Shawn Wong, himself a pioneer of Asian American literature, summarizes this still prevalent view in his introduction to Sui Sin Far/Edith Eaton’s short story “The Americanizing of Pau Tsu”:","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"228 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-11-2-228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Asian American literature begins, for the moment, with two Anglo-Chinese Canadian sisters. Over the last decade, Asian Americanist scholars Amy Ling and Annette White-Parks have established Edith Maude Eaton (1865–1914) and (Lillie) Winnifred Eaton (1875–1954) as the first Asian North American writers of fiction (Ling, Between 21; Ling, “Creating” 306; Ling and White-Parks 1). The two founders, however, have not been equally appreciated. Asian American criticism tends to see Edith Eaton, who adopted the Chinese pseudonym Sui Sin Far and who wrote sympathetically about Chinese immigrants, as a conscientious social critic. Winnifred Eaton, on the other hand, who wrote under the fabricated Japanese pseudonym Onoto Watanna and enjoyed a successful career writing popular orientalia, is regarded as a sellout and a race traitor.1 Shawn Wong, himself a pioneer of Asian American literature, summarizes this still prevalent view in his introduction to Sui Sin Far/Edith Eaton’s short story “The Americanizing of Pau Tsu”:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模范少数族裔话语与亚裔美国人的Jouis-Sense
目前,亚裔美国人文学始于两个英裔华裔加拿大姐妹。在过去的十年里,亚裔美国学者凌志美(Amy Ling)和安妮特·怀特-帕克斯(Annette White-Parks)将伊迪丝·莫德·伊顿(1865-1914)和莉莉·温妮弗莱德·伊顿(Lillie Winnifred Eaton, 1875-1954)确立为北美第一批亚裔小说作家。凌,《创造》306;然而,这两位创始人并没有得到同样的赞赏。亚裔美国评论家倾向于把伊迪丝·伊顿(Edith Eaton)视为一位有良心的社会评论家。伊顿的中文笔名是隋善法(Sui Sin Far),她对中国移民持同情态度。另一方面,用假名“渡渡小本”写作的温妮弗雷德·伊顿则被认为是卖国贼和种族叛徒作为亚裔美国文学的先驱,黄文豪在给隋诗法/伊迪丝·伊顿的短篇小说《波祖的美国化》的序言中总结了这一仍然流行的观点:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies first appeared in 1989 at the moment of a critical encounter—a head-on collision, one might say—of theories of difference (primarily Continental) and the politics of diversity (primarily American). In the ensuing years, the journal has established a critical forum where the problematic of differences is explored in texts ranging from the literary and the visual to the political and social. differences highlights theoretical debates across the disciplines that address the ways concepts and categories of difference—notably but not exclusively gender—operate within culture.
期刊最新文献
Parasymptomatic Reading: Medical Kink, Care, and the Surface/Depth Debate The Typewriter Cuts Whither Abolition? Family Corporation v. Minstrel Feminism: Reproducing Religious Freedom from Hobby Lobby to Notorious R.B.G. Epicures in Kissing: Asexuality in Venus and Adonis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1