首页 > 最新文献

Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies最新文献

英文 中文
Family Corporation v. Minstrel Feminism: Reproducing Religious Freedom from Hobby Lobby to Notorious R.B.G. 家族企业诉吟游诗人女权主义:从爱好游说团到臭名昭著的R.B.G.再现宗教自由
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10713819
Lucia Hulsether
This article interrogates feminist frameworks for understanding the racial and sexual politics of United States secularism. It theorizes the history of religious freedom law as a history of racial performance. Reading the aesthetic practices surrounding the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case and the subsequent consumer culture flurry around Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and building on accounts of religious freedom law as a vehicle for launching competing rights-based claims, the author shows the processes through which Hobby Lobby’s Christian family secured its religious exemption by conjuring ghosts of settler dispossession of indigenous people, even as an elderly Jewish justice was made to refuse submissive white femininity in the likeness of rapper Biggie Smalls. Circulated as competing minstrel brands, both performances consolidate the anti-Black and settler colonial grounds on which religious freedom laws—as well as some forms of mainstream protest against them—have flourished under neoliberal capitalism.
本文探讨了理解美国世俗主义的种族和性别政治的女权主义框架。它将宗教自由法的历史理论化为种族表现的历史。通过阅读围绕Burwell诉Hobby Lobby案的美学实践以及随后围绕Ruth Bader Ginsburg法官的消费文化热潮,并以宗教自由法作为发起基于权利的竞争主张的工具为基础,作者展示了Hobby Lobby的基督教家庭通过召唤殖民者剥夺土著人民的鬼魂来获得宗教豁免的过程,即使一位年长的犹太法官被迫拒绝模仿说唱歌手Biggie Smalls的顺从的白人女性气质。在新自由主义的资本主义下,宗教自由法——以及一些主流抗议形式——蓬勃发展,而这两种表演都巩固了反黑人和移民殖民的基础。
{"title":"Family Corporation v. Minstrel Feminism: Reproducing Religious Freedom from Hobby Lobby to Notorious R.B.G.","authors":"Lucia Hulsether","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10713819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10713819","url":null,"abstract":"This article interrogates feminist frameworks for understanding the racial and sexual politics of United States secularism. It theorizes the history of religious freedom law as a history of racial performance. Reading the aesthetic practices surrounding the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case and the subsequent consumer culture flurry around Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and building on accounts of religious freedom law as a vehicle for launching competing rights-based claims, the author shows the processes through which Hobby Lobby’s Christian family secured its religious exemption by conjuring ghosts of settler dispossession of indigenous people, even as an elderly Jewish justice was made to refuse submissive white femininity in the likeness of rapper Biggie Smalls. Circulated as competing minstrel brands, both performances consolidate the anti-Black and settler colonial grounds on which religious freedom laws—as well as some forms of mainstream protest against them—have flourished under neoliberal capitalism.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135735511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parasymptomatic Reading: Medical Kink, Care, and the Surface/Depth Debate 副症状阅读:医学纠结,护理和表面/深度辩论
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10713791
Elizabeth Freeman
Talia Schaffer has noted that care work needn’t be joined with the feeling of care. This article extends this insight to explore medical kink (“sadomedicine”) as a form of distantiated yet attuned care work that resituates the literary debates on symptomatic versus surface reading. Through the performances of Bob Flanagan, Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s 1882 novel Doctor Zay, the 1991 film Misery and its source novel, and Maria Beatty’s 2009 film Bandaged, sadomedicine is situated as an engagement with symptoms that delights in surfaces but that might also exacerbate symptoms, introduce them from outside the text, and/or attend to symptoms disconnected from deep pathologies. The term “parasymptomatic reading” conceptualizes this play with symptoms and the surface/depth distinction: it captures the role of the parasympathetic nervous system and its connection to surface bodily responses, the dialectic of sympathy and symptomaticity, and the meaning of the prefix “para” to indicate both proximity and error.
塔利亚·谢弗(Talia Schaffer)指出,护理工作不需要与被护理的感觉联系在一起。本文扩展了这一见解,以探索医学扭结(“施虐医学”)作为一种疏远但协调的护理工作形式,它保留了对症状性阅读和表面阅读的文学辩论。通过鲍勃·弗拉纳根的表演,伊丽莎白·斯图尔特·菲尔普斯1882年的小说《扎伊医生》,1991年的电影《悲惨》及其原著小说,以及玛丽亚·比蒂2009年的电影《绷带》,施虐医学被认为是一种与症状的接触,这些症状表面上令人愉悦,但也可能加剧症状,从文本之外引入它们,和/或关注与深层病理无关的症状。术语“副症状阅读”将这种游戏与症状和表面/深度区分概念化:它抓住了副交感神经系统的作用及其与表面身体反应的联系,同情和症状的辩证关系,以及前缀“para”表示接近和错误的意义。
{"title":"Parasymptomatic Reading: Medical Kink, Care, and the Surface/Depth Debate","authors":"Elizabeth Freeman","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10713791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10713791","url":null,"abstract":"Talia Schaffer has noted that care work needn’t be joined with the feeling of care. This article extends this insight to explore medical kink (“sadomedicine”) as a form of distantiated yet attuned care work that resituates the literary debates on symptomatic versus surface reading. Through the performances of Bob Flanagan, Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s 1882 novel Doctor Zay, the 1991 film Misery and its source novel, and Maria Beatty’s 2009 film Bandaged, sadomedicine is situated as an engagement with symptoms that delights in surfaces but that might also exacerbate symptoms, introduce them from outside the text, and/or attend to symptoms disconnected from deep pathologies. The term “parasymptomatic reading” conceptualizes this play with symptoms and the surface/depth distinction: it captures the role of the parasympathetic nervous system and its connection to surface bodily responses, the dialectic of sympathy and symptomaticity, and the meaning of the prefix “para” to indicate both proximity and error.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135735508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Typewriter Cuts 打字机会割伤
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10713847
Akrish Adhikari
This article studies the role of the typewriter in the Algerian War of Independence (1954–1962). When a printing press was unavailable during the war, women militants used the typewriter to process articles for El Moudjahid, the designated newspaper of the anticolonial revolutionaries. Providing a media history and theory of this event, the article argues that the typewriter—both woman and machine—was an active militant who cut texts and bodies to advance the revolutionary cause. The typewriter denaturalized assumptions about the newspaper’s colonial appearance, thus bringing forth a new form for anticolonial journalism.
本文研究了打字机在阿尔及利亚独立战争(1954-1962)中的作用。战争期间没有印刷机,女武装分子就用打字机为反殖民革命者指定的报纸《穆贾希德报》(El Moudjahid)打印文章。这篇文章提供了这一事件的媒体历史和理论,认为打字机——无论是女人还是机器——是一个积极的激进分子,她切割文本和身体来推进革命事业。打字机使人们对报纸的殖民外观的假设变性,从而为反殖民新闻带来了一种新的形式。
{"title":"The Typewriter Cuts","authors":"Akrish Adhikari","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10713847","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10713847","url":null,"abstract":"This article studies the role of the typewriter in the Algerian War of Independence (1954–1962). When a printing press was unavailable during the war, women militants used the typewriter to process articles for El Moudjahid, the designated newspaper of the anticolonial revolutionaries. Providing a media history and theory of this event, the article argues that the typewriter—both woman and machine—was an active militant who cut texts and bodies to advance the revolutionary cause. The typewriter denaturalized assumptions about the newspaper’s colonial appearance, thus bringing forth a new form for anticolonial journalism.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135735509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epicures in Kissing: Asexuality in Venus and Adonis 接吻中的享乐:维纳斯和阿多尼斯的无性恋
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10713833
Steven Swarbrick
Freud’s readings of Shakespeare are notorious for their universalizing claims about human sexuality. What is less commonly noticed, and what this article foregrounds, is the asexuality that underwrites psychoanalytic theories of sex. Venus and Adonis shows that Shakespeare’s poem is replete with asexual encounters. In other words, it is not Adonis alone who spurns sexual romance. Venus’s insatiable kissing is a textbook example of Freud’s point about the paradoxicality of sex: when it comes to the pleasures of kissing, Freud says, “It’s a pity I can’t kiss myself.” This essay reads asexuality not as a particular orientation; rather, it asks how asexuality, psychoanalysis, and Shakespeare disorient our readings of sex.
弗洛伊德对莎士比亚的解读因其对人类性行为的普遍化主张而臭名昭著。很少有人注意到的是,这篇文章强调的是,无性恋为性的精神分析理论提供了基础。《维纳斯与阿多尼斯》表明,莎士比亚的诗中充满了无性接触。换句话说,并不是只有阿多尼斯一个人拒绝性浪漫。维纳斯永不满足的亲吻是弗洛伊德关于性的悖论观点的教科书范例:当谈到亲吻的乐趣时,弗洛伊德说:“很遗憾我不能亲吻自己。”这篇文章并不把无性恋看作是一种特定的取向;相反,它问的是无性恋、精神分析和莎士比亚是如何让我们对性的解读迷失方向的。
{"title":"Epicures in Kissing: Asexuality in <i>Venus and Adonis</i>","authors":"Steven Swarbrick","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10713833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10713833","url":null,"abstract":"Freud’s readings of Shakespeare are notorious for their universalizing claims about human sexuality. What is less commonly noticed, and what this article foregrounds, is the asexuality that underwrites psychoanalytic theories of sex. Venus and Adonis shows that Shakespeare’s poem is replete with asexual encounters. In other words, it is not Adonis alone who spurns sexual romance. Venus’s insatiable kissing is a textbook example of Freud’s point about the paradoxicality of sex: when it comes to the pleasures of kissing, Freud says, “It’s a pity I can’t kiss myself.” This essay reads asexuality not as a particular orientation; rather, it asks how asexuality, psychoanalysis, and Shakespeare disorient our readings of sex.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135735513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Whither Abolition? 废除将走向何方?
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10713805
Patrick Teed
This article proposes that a brutal empiricism, constituted in abolitionism’s originary iterations, authorizes contemporary abolitionist politics, interrogating how the focalization of the prison over slavery reveals politicallibidinal investments in the reproduction of antiblackness. It argues that asserting the prison as the object of abolition both presumes and reifies an antiblack historiography, repeating the ruse of Emancipation (therefore imagining racial slavery to be a historical condition) while simultaneously deploying slavery’s idiom to animate a contemporary postracial politics. To arrive at this critique, the essay offers an analysis of the epistemic brutality subtending abolitionist politics during the long nineteenth century to put pressure on its circulation within ostensibly radical political imaginaries today. In other words, it argues that just as the originary abolitionists distorted the political demands of the enslaved to consolidate liberal humanism, so, too, do contemporary deployments of abolition similarly sediment enslavement as a regime of power.
本文提出了一种残酷的经验主义,在废奴主义的原始迭代中构成,授权当代废奴主义政治,质疑监狱对奴隶制的关注如何揭示了反黑人的再生产中的政治投资。它认为,将监狱作为废除的对象既假定又具体化了一种反黑人的史学,重复了解放的诡计(因此想象种族奴隶制是一种历史条件),同时利用奴隶制的习语来激活当代的后种族政治。为了得出这一批判,本文分析了在漫长的19世纪中,废奴主义政治的认知残暴,以对其在今天表面上激进的政治想象中的传播施加压力。换句话说,它认为,正如最初的废奴主义者扭曲了被奴役者的政治要求以巩固自由人文主义一样,当代废奴的部署也同样将奴役作为一种权力制度。
{"title":"Whither Abolition?","authors":"Patrick Teed","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10713805","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10713805","url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes that a brutal empiricism, constituted in abolitionism’s originary iterations, authorizes contemporary abolitionist politics, interrogating how the focalization of the prison over slavery reveals politicallibidinal investments in the reproduction of antiblackness. It argues that asserting the prison as the object of abolition both presumes and reifies an antiblack historiography, repeating the ruse of Emancipation (therefore imagining racial slavery to be a historical condition) while simultaneously deploying slavery’s idiom to animate a contemporary postracial politics. To arrive at this critique, the essay offers an analysis of the epistemic brutality subtending abolitionist politics during the long nineteenth century to put pressure on its circulation within ostensibly radical political imaginaries today. In other words, it argues that just as the originary abolitionists distorted the political demands of the enslaved to consolidate liberal humanism, so, too, do contemporary deployments of abolition similarly sediment enslavement as a regime of power.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135735510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bracket 支架
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10435520
Kris Cohen
In Leo Bersani’s essay “Sociality and Sexuality,” bracketing emerges as a critical procedure for sensing and for practicing nonsovereign forms of sociality. Following Foucault’s desire to discover modes of relation, forms of the homosexual, that do not yet have a world for their reception, Bersani brackets the literature on sociality and sexuality that has come before, including his own, which variously posits the homosexual and the queer as figures of radical negation. Averse to such recuperations of the sovereign self, Bersani’s bracketing instead makes space for the homoerotic as a set of fragile, experimental modes of relation in which the self is neither an enemy nor a heroic site of resistance.
在利奥·贝尔萨尼(Leo Bersani)的文章《社会性与性》(Sociality and Sexuality)中,包围法作为感知和实践非主权形式的社会性的关键程序出现。福柯渴望发现关系的模式,同性恋的形式,这些还没有一个世界可以接受,贝尔萨尼将之前出现的关于社会性和性的文学,包括他自己的文学,用不同的方式将同性恋和酷儿作为激进否定的人物。为了反对这种对主权自我的恢复,贝尔萨尼的分类反而为同性恋者创造了空间,作为一组脆弱的,实验性的关系模式,在这种关系模式中,自我既不是敌人,也不是反抗的英雄场所。
{"title":"Bracket","authors":"Kris Cohen","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10435520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10435520","url":null,"abstract":"In Leo Bersani’s essay “Sociality and Sexuality,” bracketing emerges as a critical procedure for sensing and for practicing nonsovereign forms of sociality. Following Foucault’s desire to discover modes of relation, forms of the homosexual, that do not yet have a world for their reception, Bersani brackets the literature on sociality and sexuality that has come before, including his own, which variously posits the homosexual and the queer as figures of radical negation. Averse to such recuperations of the sovereign self, Bersani’s bracketing instead makes space for the homoerotic as a set of fragile, experimental modes of relation in which the self is neither an enemy nor a heroic site of resistance.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135382292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sentences 句子
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10435843
Lee Edelman
Focusing on a passage where Leo Bersani addresses the intensity of his attachment to many of his first sentences—sentences that seemed to come all at once and to betray his own understanding of the topics they introduced—this essay considers that betrayal in relation to his view of homosexuality as betraying the seriousness of statements. By examining how the latter betrayal gets enacted in the betrayal his sentences perform, it identifies the tension in Bersani’s work between an explicit resistance to the “de-gaying” he associates with queer theory and the “de-gaying” impulse of his own work, which made it central to queer theory itself.
这篇文章的重点是一段话,在这段话里,利奥·贝尔萨尼表达了他对他的许多开头句子的强烈依恋——这些句子似乎一下子就出现了,背叛了他自己对这些句子所引入的主题的理解——这篇文章认为,背叛与他对同性恋的看法有关,背叛了陈述的严肃性。通过研究后一种背叛是如何在他的句子中表现出来的,它确定了贝尔萨尼作品中的紧张关系,一方面是对他与酷儿理论相关的“去同性恋化”的明确抵制,另一方面是他自己作品中的“去同性恋化”冲动,这使得它成为酷儿理论本身的核心。
{"title":"Sentences","authors":"Lee Edelman","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10435843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10435843","url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on a passage where Leo Bersani addresses the intensity of his attachment to many of his first sentences—sentences that seemed to come all at once and to betray his own understanding of the topics they introduced—this essay considers that betrayal in relation to his view of homosexuality as betraying the seriousness of statements. By examining how the latter betrayal gets enacted in the betrayal his sentences perform, it identifies the tension in Bersani’s work between an explicit resistance to the “de-gaying” he associates with queer theory and the “de-gaying” impulse of his own work, which made it central to queer theory itself.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135382291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Withdrawal 撤军
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10435927
Damon Ross Young
Leo Bersani’s writings on aesthetics, often coauthored with Ulysse Dutoit, repeatedly deploy the trope of withdrawal, finding in the aesthetic works they discuss, such as Jean-Luc Godard’s film Contempt, a paradoxical double movement of bringing into view while projecting the erasure of form and distinction. In their reading of Contempt, Bersani and Dutoit adumbrate a uniformity that would depend on the elimination of measurement, reference, and subject-object relations. In doing so, they transfigure the idea of antirelationality often attributed to Bersani, associating the death it surely names with the illumination of Being.
狮子座Bersani对美学的著作,经常与Ulysse Dutoit,多次部署撤退的比喻,发现在审美他们讨论工作,比如让-吕克·戈达尔的电影轻蔑,而突出矛盾的双重运动将进入视图形式和擦除的区别。在他们对《蔑视》的解读中,Bersani和Dutoit预示了一种统一性,这种统一性将依赖于消除测量、参考和主客体关系。在这样做的过程中,他们改变了通常归因于贝尔萨尼的反关系的观点,将死亡与存在的光明联系起来。
{"title":"Withdrawal","authors":"Damon Ross Young","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10435927","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10435927","url":null,"abstract":"Leo Bersani’s writings on aesthetics, often coauthored with Ulysse Dutoit, repeatedly deploy the trope of withdrawal, finding in the aesthetic works they discuss, such as Jean-Luc Godard’s film Contempt, a paradoxical double movement of bringing into view while projecting the erasure of form and distinction. In their reading of Contempt, Bersani and Dutoit adumbrate a uniformity that would depend on the elimination of measurement, reference, and subject-object relations. In doing so, they transfigure the idea of antirelationality often attributed to Bersani, associating the death it surely names with the illumination of Being.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135382293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aestheticism 唯美主义
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10435464
John David Rhodes
This essay considers Bersani and Dutoit’s alignment of passivity and the aesthetic in “Merde Alors,” their essay on Pier Paolo Pasolini’s film Salò. Passivity is a key strategy for the production of works of art and is key to understanding the mode of the aesthetic itself. The question of passivity appears elsewhere in Bersani’s work, and “Merde Alors”—in whole or in part—was republished at key moments in Bersani’s career. This essay gestures toward why “Merde Alors” has had such an interesting and prolific afterlife.
这篇文章考虑了贝尔萨尼和杜图瓦在他们对皮尔·保罗·帕索里尼的电影Salò的文章“Merde Alors”中对被动性和美学的结合。被动性是艺术作品生产的关键策略,也是理解审美本身模式的关键。被动性的问题出现在贝尔萨尼作品的其他地方,在贝尔萨尼职业生涯的关键时刻,《孤独》(或全部或部分)被重新出版。这篇文章试图解释为什么《Merde Alors》会有如此有趣和多产的来生。
{"title":"Aestheticism","authors":"John David Rhodes","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10435464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10435464","url":null,"abstract":"This essay considers Bersani and Dutoit’s alignment of passivity and the aesthetic in “Merde Alors,” their essay on Pier Paolo Pasolini’s film Salò. Passivity is a key strategy for the production of works of art and is key to understanding the mode of the aesthetic itself. The question of passivity appears elsewhere in Bersani’s work, and “Merde Alors”—in whole or in part—was republished at key moments in Bersani’s career. This essay gestures toward why “Merde Alors” has had such an interesting and prolific afterlife.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135382295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perhaps 也许
4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1215/10407391-10435787
Karen Redrobe
This essay explores Leo Bersani’s use of intellectual uncertainty, openness, and tautness in his writing to create a space for thinking about “what is politically unfixable in the human” (Homos 71). In particular, this essay, which travels under the banner of the word perhaps, pays attention to Bersani’s first brief, then extended response to Jean Genet’s statement (in the context of his play, The Maids), “I suppose that there is a union for domestic servants—that is not our affair.”
这篇文章探讨了利奥·贝尔萨尼在他的作品中运用知识的不确定性、开放性和紧绷性,为思考“人类在政治上不可修复的东西”创造了一个空间(Homos 71)。特别是,这篇以“也许”这个词为主题的文章,关注了贝尔萨尼对让·热内的陈述(在他的戏剧《女仆》的背景下)的第一个简要,然后扩展的回应,“我想有一个家庭仆人的工会——这不是我们的事。”
{"title":"Perhaps","authors":"Karen Redrobe","doi":"10.1215/10407391-10435787","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-10435787","url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores Leo Bersani’s use of intellectual uncertainty, openness, and tautness in his writing to create a space for thinking about “what is politically unfixable in the human” (Homos 71). In particular, this essay, which travels under the banner of the word perhaps, pays attention to Bersani’s first brief, then extended response to Jean Genet’s statement (in the context of his play, The Maids), “I suppose that there is a union for domestic servants—that is not our affair.”","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135382294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1