Comparison of Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review

Azari H
{"title":"Comparison of Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review","authors":"Azari H","doi":"10.26420/austinalzheimersjparkinsonsdis.2021.1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is regarded as a viable therapeutic choice for Parkinson’s Disease (PD). The two most common sites for DBS are the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) and Globus Pallidus (GPi). In this study, the clinical effectiveness of these two targets was compared. Methods: A systematic literature search in electronic databases were restricted to English language publications 2010 to 2021. Specified MeSH terms were searched in all databases. Studies that evaluated the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III were selected by meeting the following criteria: (1) had at least three months follow-up period; (2) compared both GPi and STN DBS; (3) at least five participants in each group; (4) conducted after 2010. Study quality assessment was performed using the Modified Jadad Scale. Results: 3577 potentially relevant articles were identified 3569 were excluded based on title and abstract, duplicate and unsuitable article removal. Eight articles satisfied the inclusion criteria and were scrutinized (458 PD patients). Majority of studies reported no statistically significant between-group difference for improvements in UPDRS III scores. Conclusions: Although there were some results in terms of action tremor, rigidity, and urinary symptoms, which indicated that STN DBS might be a better choice or regarding the adverse effects, GPi seemed better; but it cannot be concluded that one target is superior. Other larger randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up periods and control groups are needed to decide which target is more efficient for stimulation and imposes fewer adverse effects on the patients.","PeriodicalId":90442,"journal":{"name":"Austin Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinalzheimersjparkinsonsdis.2021.1033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is regarded as a viable therapeutic choice for Parkinson’s Disease (PD). The two most common sites for DBS are the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) and Globus Pallidus (GPi). In this study, the clinical effectiveness of these two targets was compared. Methods: A systematic literature search in electronic databases were restricted to English language publications 2010 to 2021. Specified MeSH terms were searched in all databases. Studies that evaluated the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III were selected by meeting the following criteria: (1) had at least three months follow-up period; (2) compared both GPi and STN DBS; (3) at least five participants in each group; (4) conducted after 2010. Study quality assessment was performed using the Modified Jadad Scale. Results: 3577 potentially relevant articles were identified 3569 were excluded based on title and abstract, duplicate and unsuitable article removal. Eight articles satisfied the inclusion criteria and were scrutinized (458 PD patients). Majority of studies reported no statistically significant between-group difference for improvements in UPDRS III scores. Conclusions: Although there were some results in terms of action tremor, rigidity, and urinary symptoms, which indicated that STN DBS might be a better choice or regarding the adverse effects, GPi seemed better; but it cannot be concluded that one target is superior. Other larger randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up periods and control groups are needed to decide which target is more efficient for stimulation and imposes fewer adverse effects on the patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丘脑下核和苍白球深部脑刺激治疗帕金森病的比较:系统综述
背景:脑深部电刺激(DBS)被认为是治疗帕金森病(PD)的可行选择。DBS最常见的两个部位是丘脑下核(STN)和苍白球(GPi)。本研究比较了这两种靶点的临床疗效。方法:在电子数据库中系统检索2010 ~ 2021年的英文出版物。在所有数据库中搜索指定的MeSH术语。评估统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS) III的研究是通过满足以下标准来选择的:(1)至少有三个月的随访期;(2)比较GPi和STN DBS;(3)每组至少5人;(4) 2010年以后进行。采用改良Jadad量表进行研究质量评估。结果:根据标题和摘要、重复和不合适的文章删除,识别出3577篇可能相关的文章,排除3569篇。8篇符合纳入标准的文章(458例PD患者)被仔细审查。大多数研究报告UPDRS III评分改善的组间差异无统计学意义。结论:虽然在震颤、强直和泌尿系统症状方面有一些结果,表明STN DBS可能是更好的选择,或者在不良反应方面,GPi似乎更好;但不能断定一个目标是优越的。需要进行其他更大规模的随机临床试验,并进行更长的随访期和对照组,以确定哪个目标对刺激更有效,对患者的不良影响更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Basics of Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia Investigating the Involvement of Cytokines and Neurotrophic Factors in the Advanced Stages of Huntington’s Disease: A BACHD Study Comparison of Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review Reversible Parkinsonism due to Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Case Report Cycle on Wheels: Is APP Key to the AppBp1 Pathway?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1