Human Freedom and the Technic of Nature: Culture and Organic Life in Kant's Third Critique

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2003-08-21 DOI:10.1215/10407391-14-2-1
Pheng Cheah
{"title":"Human Freedom and the Technic of Nature: Culture and Organic Life in Kant's Third Critique","authors":"Pheng Cheah","doi":"10.1215/10407391-14-2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the impact of exponential technological innovation and globalization on all spheres of human life has led to the urgent questioning of the limits of the human and even to predictions about its imminent demise within the horizon of virtual reality and cyborg worlds where the boundaries of human bodies themselves seem to dissolve as they undergo limitless prosthetic extension. But the question of the end of man, or the posthuman, is not a new one. It is a grand old anthropologistic theme. As Jacques Derrida pointed out in 1968 (with special reference to Foucault’s prediction of the disappearance of man at the conclusion of The Order of Things), the end of man in the sense of the exceeding of the limits of the anthropos always involves a transcendence of human finitude that points toward a higher end in the sense of an infinite telos.","PeriodicalId":46313,"journal":{"name":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Differences-A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-14-2-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In recent years, the impact of exponential technological innovation and globalization on all spheres of human life has led to the urgent questioning of the limits of the human and even to predictions about its imminent demise within the horizon of virtual reality and cyborg worlds where the boundaries of human bodies themselves seem to dissolve as they undergo limitless prosthetic extension. But the question of the end of man, or the posthuman, is not a new one. It is a grand old anthropologistic theme. As Jacques Derrida pointed out in 1968 (with special reference to Foucault’s prediction of the disappearance of man at the conclusion of The Order of Things), the end of man in the sense of the exceeding of the limits of the anthropos always involves a transcendence of human finitude that points toward a higher end in the sense of an infinite telos.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人的自由与自然的技术:康德第三批判中的文化与有机生命
近年来,指数级技术创新和全球化对人类生活各个领域的影响,导致了对人类极限的迫切质疑,甚至在虚拟现实和半机械人世界的视野中,人类身体本身的边界似乎随着假肢的无限延伸而消失,预言人类即将消亡。但是人类的终结,或者说后人类的终结,并不是一个新问题。这是一个宏大而古老的人类学主题。正如雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)在1968年指出的那样(特别提到福柯在《事物的秩序》(the Order of Things)的结语中对人类消失的预言),在超越人类极限的意义上,人类的终结总是涉及对人类有限性的超越,这种超越在无限的终极意义上指向更高的终结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies first appeared in 1989 at the moment of a critical encounter—a head-on collision, one might say—of theories of difference (primarily Continental) and the politics of diversity (primarily American). In the ensuing years, the journal has established a critical forum where the problematic of differences is explored in texts ranging from the literary and the visual to the political and social. differences highlights theoretical debates across the disciplines that address the ways concepts and categories of difference—notably but not exclusively gender—operate within culture.
期刊最新文献
Parasymptomatic Reading: Medical Kink, Care, and the Surface/Depth Debate The Typewriter Cuts Whither Abolition? Family Corporation v. Minstrel Feminism: Reproducing Religious Freedom from Hobby Lobby to Notorious R.B.G. Epicures in Kissing: Asexuality in Venus and Adonis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1