Risk Assessment : Present and Future

O. Wada, N. Kurihara, Gao Qiang
{"title":"Risk Assessment : Present and Future","authors":"O. Wada, N. Kurihara, Gao Qiang","doi":"10.1248/JHS1956.41.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk assessment is a scientific endeavour to evaluate and estimate the exposure to a substance and its consequent adverse health effects by the use of the available scientific information. The four phases of the risk assessment include hazard identification, exposure estimation, doseresponse assessment and risk characterization. Recently, risk management and risk communication have been added as its final components. At present, however, methods for identifying toxicants and exposed individuals and populations, models for inferring human health effects from animal studies, techniques for estimating risks and predicting health effects with few data are all in need of improvement or development. Fortunately, remarkable advances in biotoxicology and molecular biology have promoted new understandings in the mechanism of disease. Incorporation of these new data moved the evaluation closer to the goal of estimating actual human risks. Recently developed physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models for the estimation of active chemical levels at critical organs and their conjugation with biologically-based pharmacodynamic models of the process of carcinogenesis seem to be not only an essential part of a rational approach to quantitative cancer risk assessment, but also raise fundamental questions about the nature of the events leading to malignancy. These scientific progress will develop sound risk assessment, dissolve the wide divergency in regulatory decisions of agencies in different countries, and lead to better health protection.","PeriodicalId":14851,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of toxicology and environmental health","volume":"11 1","pages":"256-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of toxicology and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/JHS1956.41.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Risk assessment is a scientific endeavour to evaluate and estimate the exposure to a substance and its consequent adverse health effects by the use of the available scientific information. The four phases of the risk assessment include hazard identification, exposure estimation, doseresponse assessment and risk characterization. Recently, risk management and risk communication have been added as its final components. At present, however, methods for identifying toxicants and exposed individuals and populations, models for inferring human health effects from animal studies, techniques for estimating risks and predicting health effects with few data are all in need of improvement or development. Fortunately, remarkable advances in biotoxicology and molecular biology have promoted new understandings in the mechanism of disease. Incorporation of these new data moved the evaluation closer to the goal of estimating actual human risks. Recently developed physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models for the estimation of active chemical levels at critical organs and their conjugation with biologically-based pharmacodynamic models of the process of carcinogenesis seem to be not only an essential part of a rational approach to quantitative cancer risk assessment, but also raise fundamental questions about the nature of the events leading to malignancy. These scientific progress will develop sound risk assessment, dissolve the wide divergency in regulatory decisions of agencies in different countries, and lead to better health protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险评估:现在和未来
风险评估是利用现有的科学信息,评估和估计接触某种物质及其对健康的不利影响的一项科学努力。风险评估的四个阶段包括危害识别、暴露估计、剂量反应评估和风险表征。最近,增加了风险管理和风险沟通作为其最终组成部分。但是,目前确定毒物和受接触的个人和人群的方法、从动物研究推断人类健康影响的模型、在数据很少的情况下估计风险和预测健康影响的技术都需要改进或发展。幸运的是,生物毒理学和分子生物学的显著进步促进了对疾病机制的新认识。纳入这些新数据使评估更接近于估计实际人类风险的目标。最近发展的基于生理的药代动力学模型,用于估计关键器官的活性化学水平,并将其与基于生物学的癌变过程药效学模型结合起来,似乎不仅是定量癌症风险评估的合理方法的重要组成部分,而且还提出了有关导致恶性肿瘤事件性质的基本问题。这些科学进展将发展健全的风险评估,消除不同国家机构在管理决定方面的巨大差异,并导致更好的健康保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SELECTIVE AND SIMPLE QUANTIFICATION OF METALLOTHIONEIN III IN MOUSE BRAIN METALLOTHIONEIN INDUCTION IN RAT BRAIN AFTER INTRASTRIATAL INJECTION OF ZINC AND CADMIUM SALTS Studies on Photochemical Behaviors of Pesticides in Environment. Oil Spill Accident in the Sea of Japan Identification of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons of the Particulate Accumulated in the Tunnel Duct of Freeway and Generation of Their Oxygenated Derivatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1