Asian Americans and Anti-Blackness

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics Groups and Identities Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1080/21565503.2021.2016448
C. Kim
{"title":"Asian Americans and Anti-Blackness","authors":"C. Kim","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2021.2016448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship is less about producing or revealing everlasting, universal truth than it is about engaging the ever-changing world around us in a critical and open-ended way. Revisiting scholarship from an earlier period allows us to reconsider academic research in relation to the specific political context in which it emerged, as well as the unfolding political contexts in which it continues to be read and put to use. It is an opportunity to think through the temporality of the ideas in question. Are they still relevant, less relevant, or perhaps differently relevant, in a new age? I am grateful for this chance to revisit “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans” (1999), and I thank the editors, Christian Hosam and Sonya Chen, for conceiving and executing this project with dedication, insight, and skill. We live in the shadow cast by recent political events, whose flagrancy and intensity have surprised even the most pessimistic among us. From the police murder of George Floyd to the racially disparate impacts of COVID-19 to the rise of anti-Asian hate to the white nationalist insurrection at the Capitol to the assault on voting rights, we are reminded what a central role race plays in organizing U.S. social and political life. White resentment, briefly shamed into disguising itself after the civil rights era, has lost its shame and is stalking the land again like a rageful, hungry ghost. The preexisting fissures in the foundations of our democracy widen. When the Black Lives Matter movement called for a response to George Floyd’s murder—and to policing, racial capitalism, and the carceral system more broadly—an estimated 15–26 million Americans took to the streets. It was the nation’s largest and most multiracial protest in history. But how will these historic events be understood and remembered? Whoever controls the narrative controls the future. One Republican-led state legislature after another is now prohibiting the teaching of “critical race theory,” defined as anything that suggests racism has been integral to U.S. history. The ideological fix is in. Simply trying to understand race is now, more than ever, an act of political resistance. We must undertake it with a new sense of urgency. I thank the authors in this Dialogues section for approaching their charge in this spirit. Together, they note racial triangulation’s contributions to our understanding while also offering thoughtful and rigorous criticisms of where the theory is underspecified, where its conceptual focus is too narrow, and where it simply gets things wrong. All of the authors convey a sense of how important it is to get our understanding of racial dynamics","PeriodicalId":46590,"journal":{"name":"Politics Groups and Identities","volume":"15 1","pages":"503 - 510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Groups and Identities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.2016448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Scholarship is less about producing or revealing everlasting, universal truth than it is about engaging the ever-changing world around us in a critical and open-ended way. Revisiting scholarship from an earlier period allows us to reconsider academic research in relation to the specific political context in which it emerged, as well as the unfolding political contexts in which it continues to be read and put to use. It is an opportunity to think through the temporality of the ideas in question. Are they still relevant, less relevant, or perhaps differently relevant, in a new age? I am grateful for this chance to revisit “The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans” (1999), and I thank the editors, Christian Hosam and Sonya Chen, for conceiving and executing this project with dedication, insight, and skill. We live in the shadow cast by recent political events, whose flagrancy and intensity have surprised even the most pessimistic among us. From the police murder of George Floyd to the racially disparate impacts of COVID-19 to the rise of anti-Asian hate to the white nationalist insurrection at the Capitol to the assault on voting rights, we are reminded what a central role race plays in organizing U.S. social and political life. White resentment, briefly shamed into disguising itself after the civil rights era, has lost its shame and is stalking the land again like a rageful, hungry ghost. The preexisting fissures in the foundations of our democracy widen. When the Black Lives Matter movement called for a response to George Floyd’s murder—and to policing, racial capitalism, and the carceral system more broadly—an estimated 15–26 million Americans took to the streets. It was the nation’s largest and most multiracial protest in history. But how will these historic events be understood and remembered? Whoever controls the narrative controls the future. One Republican-led state legislature after another is now prohibiting the teaching of “critical race theory,” defined as anything that suggests racism has been integral to U.S. history. The ideological fix is in. Simply trying to understand race is now, more than ever, an act of political resistance. We must undertake it with a new sense of urgency. I thank the authors in this Dialogues section for approaching their charge in this spirit. Together, they note racial triangulation’s contributions to our understanding while also offering thoughtful and rigorous criticisms of where the theory is underspecified, where its conceptual focus is too narrow, and where it simply gets things wrong. All of the authors convey a sense of how important it is to get our understanding of racial dynamics
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚裔美国人和反黑人
学术与其说是产生或揭示永恒的、普遍的真理,不如说是以一种批判和开放的方式参与我们周围不断变化的世界。回顾早期的学术研究,可以让我们重新考虑学术研究与它产生的特定政治背景的关系,以及它继续被阅读和使用的不断发展的政治背景。这是一个思考问题中思想的时间性的机会。在一个新时代,它们是否仍然相关,不那么相关,或者相关性可能有所不同?我很感激能有机会重温《亚裔美国人的种族三角测量》(1999),我感谢编辑克里斯蒂安·霍萨姆(Christian Hosam)和索尼娅·陈(Sonya Chen),他们以奉献精神、洞察力和技巧构思和执行了这个项目。我们生活在最近的政治事件所投下的阴影中,这些事件的严重程度和强度甚至使我们当中最悲观的人都感到惊讶。从警察谋杀乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)到新冠肺炎(COVID-19)的种族差异影响,从反亚洲仇恨的兴起,到国会大厦的白人民族主义叛乱,再到对投票权的攻击,我们都在提醒着种族在组织美国社会和政治生活中的核心作用。白人的怨恨,在民权时代之后短暂地羞愧地伪装起来,已经失去了羞耻感,像一个愤怒的、饥饿的幽灵一样再次在这片土地上徘徊。我们民主基础中先前存在的裂缝扩大了。当“黑人的命也是命”运动呼吁对乔治·弗洛伊德谋杀案——以及更广泛的警察、种族资本主义和监狱制度——做出回应时,估计有1500万至2600万美国人走上街头。这是美国历史上规模最大、种族最多元的抗议活动。但是,人们将如何理解和记住这些历史事件呢?谁控制了叙事,谁就控制了未来。一个又一个共和党领导的州立法机构现在禁止教授“批判种族理论”,这种理论被定义为任何暗示种族主义与美国历史密不可分的东西。意识形态的修复已经开始。现在,仅仅试图理解种族,比以往任何时候都更像是一种政治抵抗行为。我们必须以一种新的紧迫感来进行这项工作。我感谢本对话部分的作者本着这种精神对待他们的责任。他们共同指出了种族三角法对我们理解的贡献,同时也对该理论的不足之处、其概念焦点过于狭隘之处以及错误之处提出了深思熟虑而严谨的批评。所有的作者都传达了一种意识,即了解种族动态是多么重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics Groups and Identities
Politics Groups and Identities POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Viewers like you: the effect of elite co-identity reinforcement on U.S. immigration attitudes A nation of immigrants? The case for a politically influential and intersectional immigrant identity in the United States White candidate support continues amidst explicit and implicit white identity cues Envisioning a world without prisons: group concept mapping as a collective strategy for justice and dignity Trump’s African Americans? Racial resentment and Black support for Trump in the 2020 elections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1