Comparative Evaluation Of Amount Of Apically Extruded Debris In Endodontic Retreatment Procedures Using Four Different File Systems- An Invitro Study

Tarun Saxena
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation Of Amount Of Apically Extruded Debris In Endodontic Retreatment Procedures Using Four Different File Systems- An Invitro Study","authors":"Tarun Saxena","doi":"10.21276/ujds.2023.9.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective(s): To compare the amount of apical debris extruded during endodontic retreatment procedures performed using H files, R-Endo Retreatment files, GPR files and ProTaper Universal Retreatment files. \nMaterials and Methods: The conventional coronal access cavity was prepared for 40 extracted Mandibular Premolars. The root canals were prepared with ProTaper Next Rotary files till X1.  Obturation was done by combination of Lateral and Vertical Compaction technique. All the samples were later attached to Eppendorf tubes. The samples were then divided into four groups each containing 10 samples on the basis of different retreatment files to be used.  After complete removal of root canal filling material, the debris and the root filling material remnants adhered was collected in preattached Eppendorf tubes. For final weight computation and comparison, the weight of empty tube was deducted from the weight of tube accommodating the debris. ANOVA and Tukey test were applied for statistical analysis. \nResults: The R-Endo retreatment files showed minimum apical extrusion of debris than all the other examined files in the study. The apical extrusion of debris for R Endo min to max was -0.045 to 0.009. However, there was no statistically significant difference in amount of apical extrusion of debris by different files system (p>0.005). \nConclusion(s): There was no significant difference between the groups in apical extrusion of debris. Also rotary retreatment files showed lesser apical of debris than Hedstrom hand files. R Endo extruded less debris apically in this study. \nKeywords: Apical extrusion of debris; Gutta-percha; Retreatment files. ","PeriodicalId":100856,"journal":{"name":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276/ujds.2023.9.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s): To compare the amount of apical debris extruded during endodontic retreatment procedures performed using H files, R-Endo Retreatment files, GPR files and ProTaper Universal Retreatment files. Materials and Methods: The conventional coronal access cavity was prepared for 40 extracted Mandibular Premolars. The root canals were prepared with ProTaper Next Rotary files till X1.  Obturation was done by combination of Lateral and Vertical Compaction technique. All the samples were later attached to Eppendorf tubes. The samples were then divided into four groups each containing 10 samples on the basis of different retreatment files to be used.  After complete removal of root canal filling material, the debris and the root filling material remnants adhered was collected in preattached Eppendorf tubes. For final weight computation and comparison, the weight of empty tube was deducted from the weight of tube accommodating the debris. ANOVA and Tukey test were applied for statistical analysis. Results: The R-Endo retreatment files showed minimum apical extrusion of debris than all the other examined files in the study. The apical extrusion of debris for R Endo min to max was -0.045 to 0.009. However, there was no statistically significant difference in amount of apical extrusion of debris by different files system (p>0.005). Conclusion(s): There was no significant difference between the groups in apical extrusion of debris. Also rotary retreatment files showed lesser apical of debris than Hedstrom hand files. R Endo extruded less debris apically in this study. Keywords: Apical extrusion of debris; Gutta-percha; Retreatment files. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种不同的文件系统对根管再治疗过程中根尖挤压碎片数量的比较评价-一项体外研究
目的:比较H锉、R-Endo锉、GPR锉和ProTaper通用锉在根管再治疗过程中挤出的根尖碎片数量。材料与方法:对40颗拔除的下颌前磨牙制备常规冠状通道。用ProTaper Next Rotary锉预备根管至X1。采用横向和纵向压实技术进行封闭。所有的样品随后都附着在埃彭多夫管上。然后根据不同的再处理文件将样品分为4组,每组10个样品。根管充填材料完全去除后,将附着的根管碎片和根管充填材料残余物收集在预贴的埃彭多夫管中。为了最终的重量计算和比较,将空管的重量从容纳碎片的管的重量中扣除。采用方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计分析。结果:R-Endo再处理锉比所有其他检查锉显示最小的根尖挤压碎片。R远藤的岩屑顶端挤压最小值为-0.045 ~ 0.009。然而,不同文件系统对碎片的根尖挤压量差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:两组间残体根尖挤压无显著性差异。此外,旋转再处理锉显示较少的尖屑比赫德斯特罗姆手锉。R Endo在本研究中挤出的根尖碎片较少。关键词:岩屑顶端挤压;杜仲胶;再处理文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Review of Surface Coatings for enhancement of Anti-Microbial and Anti-Corrosive Properties of Titanium Implant Surface Unusually Large Radicular Cyst of Mandible: A Rare Case Report Revisiting “Plaque Free Zone”- Island of Peace in a Zone of Conflict: A stereomicroscopic study Misdiagnosed Case Management of Dens Invaginatus Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography- A Case Report Comparison of the Effect of Various Surface Treatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic with Dentin- An In-vitro Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1