Re-examining the relationship between Latino population size and position taking on Latino interests in the US House of Representatives

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics Groups and Identities Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.1080/21565503.2022.2026792
Michael S. Rocca, Lisa M. Sanchez, Jared W. Clay, Gabriel R. Sanchez
{"title":"Re-examining the relationship between Latino population size and position taking on Latino interests in the US House of Representatives","authors":"Michael S. Rocca, Lisa M. Sanchez, Jared W. Clay, Gabriel R. Sanchez","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2022.2026792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In contrast to strong evidence that increases in district-level African American population size leads to greater support of African American issues in Congress, 40 years of research has been decidedly mixed on whether increases in district-level Latino population size translate to greater support of Latino issues. This paper provides an update to this literature by analyzing members’ of Congress (MCs) support of Latino issues through roll call voting, as collected by the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda (NHLA) in the 113th (2013–2014) through 115th (2017–2018) House of Representatives. First, we find no relationship between NHLA scores and Latino district-level population size among Democratic MCs. The reason is that Democrats’ NHLA baseline support is already very high, regardless of Latino population size. But Republican MCs’ support for NHLA positions in the 113th through 115th Congresses increases as the size of their Latino constituency increases. Interestingly, we find that this relationship is tied to a district’s Latino noncitizen population as well as their Latino voter-eligible population. So, while Democrats on the whole may provide greater substantive representation to Latinos than Republican MCs, Republican MCs are not entirely unresponsive to Latino interests, particularly if they are given sufficient reason to be responsive.","PeriodicalId":46590,"journal":{"name":"Politics Groups and Identities","volume":"31 1","pages":"916 - 934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Groups and Identities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2026792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In contrast to strong evidence that increases in district-level African American population size leads to greater support of African American issues in Congress, 40 years of research has been decidedly mixed on whether increases in district-level Latino population size translate to greater support of Latino issues. This paper provides an update to this literature by analyzing members’ of Congress (MCs) support of Latino issues through roll call voting, as collected by the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda (NHLA) in the 113th (2013–2014) through 115th (2017–2018) House of Representatives. First, we find no relationship between NHLA scores and Latino district-level population size among Democratic MCs. The reason is that Democrats’ NHLA baseline support is already very high, regardless of Latino population size. But Republican MCs’ support for NHLA positions in the 113th through 115th Congresses increases as the size of their Latino constituency increases. Interestingly, we find that this relationship is tied to a district’s Latino noncitizen population as well as their Latino voter-eligible population. So, while Democrats on the whole may provide greater substantive representation to Latinos than Republican MCs, Republican MCs are not entirely unresponsive to Latino interests, particularly if they are given sufficient reason to be responsive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视拉丁裔人口规模与拉丁裔在美国众议院中的地位之间的关系
有强有力的证据表明,地区一级的非裔美国人人口规模的增加会导致国会对非裔美国人问题的更大支持,与此相反,40年的研究在地区一级的拉丁裔人口规模的增加是否会转化为对拉丁裔问题的更大支持方面一直存在明显的分歧。本文通过分析第113届(2013-2014年)至第115届(2017-2018年)众议院“国家西班牙裔领导议程”(NHLA)收集的国会议员通过唱名投票支持拉美裔问题的情况,对上述文献进行了更新。首先,我们发现民主党MCs的NHLA分数与拉丁裔地区人口规模之间没有关系。原因是,无论拉丁裔人口规模如何,民主党在NHLA的基线支持率已经很高了。但随着拉丁裔选区的增加,共和党议员在第113届至第115届国会中对NHLA职位的支持也在增加。有趣的是,我们发现这种关系与一个地区的拉丁裔非公民人口以及他们的拉丁裔选民资格人口有关。因此,虽然民主党人总体上可能比共和党mc为拉丁美洲人提供更多的实质性代表,但共和党mc并非完全对拉丁美洲人的利益无动于衷,特别是如果他们有充分的理由做出回应的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics Groups and Identities
Politics Groups and Identities POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Viewers like you: the effect of elite co-identity reinforcement on U.S. immigration attitudes A nation of immigrants? The case for a politically influential and intersectional immigrant identity in the United States White candidate support continues amidst explicit and implicit white identity cues Envisioning a world without prisons: group concept mapping as a collective strategy for justice and dignity Trump’s African Americans? Racial resentment and Black support for Trump in the 2020 elections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1