Knowledge, Attitudes and Perception of the Public on Female Genital Mutilation

Akintoye Emily Obaide, Akintoye Onome Pearl, Adjene Josiah Obaghwarhievwo, Emily Obaide
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes and Perception of the Public on Female Genital Mutilation","authors":"Akintoye Emily Obaide, Akintoye Onome Pearl, Adjene Josiah Obaghwarhievwo, Emily Obaide","doi":"10.47485/2767-5416.1019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite global concerns, awareness, and campaigns against Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), prevalence remains high in most countries of the globe, especially Africa. Current study investigated the knowledge, attitude and public perception on FGM of Bini indigenes who reside in Oredo Local Government Area of Edo State, Southern Nigeria. A total of one hundred and fifty (150) participants were ethically recruited from Benin City, Nigeria. An open ended questionnaire of about the same number (n = 150) was carefully structured, validated and distributed to participants in order to ascertain their level of awareness and understanding of the socio-cultural implications of FGM. An oral interview was also conducted on participants to determine the effect of their level of education on possible promulgation of FGM within the study area. Sociodemographic data of respondents were also collected and comparisons made across gender, age and religious lines on beliefs and practices of FGM. Sections of the questionnaire were subjected to statistical analysis after data collection, results expressed in simple percentages. After careful observation, study found that about 74.5% of the respondents were ill-informed on the cultural norms and principles of FGM in line with global best practices of the World Health Organizations (WHO). However, not fewer than 36.3% of the respondents show adequate knowledge on the concept of FGM. Study also observed that a great percentage of educated respondents strongly opposed to the idea of FGM. This implies that educational health campaigns against FGM could be useful in combating the hazardous implications of FGM on the socio-cultural well-being of the female child. Continuous education geared towards global best practices in study area is highly recommended.","PeriodicalId":94090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical clinical case reports","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical clinical case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47485/2767-5416.1019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite global concerns, awareness, and campaigns against Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), prevalence remains high in most countries of the globe, especially Africa. Current study investigated the knowledge, attitude and public perception on FGM of Bini indigenes who reside in Oredo Local Government Area of Edo State, Southern Nigeria. A total of one hundred and fifty (150) participants were ethically recruited from Benin City, Nigeria. An open ended questionnaire of about the same number (n = 150) was carefully structured, validated and distributed to participants in order to ascertain their level of awareness and understanding of the socio-cultural implications of FGM. An oral interview was also conducted on participants to determine the effect of their level of education on possible promulgation of FGM within the study area. Sociodemographic data of respondents were also collected and comparisons made across gender, age and religious lines on beliefs and practices of FGM. Sections of the questionnaire were subjected to statistical analysis after data collection, results expressed in simple percentages. After careful observation, study found that about 74.5% of the respondents were ill-informed on the cultural norms and principles of FGM in line with global best practices of the World Health Organizations (WHO). However, not fewer than 36.3% of the respondents show adequate knowledge on the concept of FGM. Study also observed that a great percentage of educated respondents strongly opposed to the idea of FGM. This implies that educational health campaigns against FGM could be useful in combating the hazardous implications of FGM on the socio-cultural well-being of the female child. Continuous education geared towards global best practices in study area is highly recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对女性生殖器切割的知识、态度和看法
尽管全球都在关注、提高认识并开展了反对切割女性生殖器官的运动,但在全球大多数国家,特别是非洲,流行率仍然很高。本研究调查了居住在尼日利亚南部埃多州奥雷多地方政府地区的比尼土著居民对女性生殖器切割的知识、态度和公众看法。从尼日利亚贝宁市招募了150名参与者。一份大约相同数量的开放式问卷(n = 150)经过仔细编制、验证并分发给参与者,以确定他们对女性生殖器切割的社会文化影响的认识和理解程度。还对参与者进行了一次口头访谈,以确定他们的教育水平对研究区域内可能推行女性生殖器切割的影响。还收集了被访者的社会人口统计数据,并就女性生殖器切割的信仰和做法进行了跨性别、年龄和宗教的比较。问卷各部分在收集数据后进行统计分析,结果以简单百分比表示。经过仔细观察,研究发现,约74.5%的答复者不了解符合世界卫生组织(世卫组织)全球最佳做法的女性生殖器切割的文化规范和原则。然而,不少于36.3%的受访者对女性生殖器切割的概念有足够的了解。研究还指出,受过教育的受访者中有很大一部分强烈反对女性生殖器切割的想法。这意味着,反对切割女性生殖器官的教育保健运动可能有助于消除切割女性生殖器官对女童社会文化福祉的有害影响。强烈建议继续学习研究领域的全球最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Unusual Pulmonary Lobe Purple Urine Bag Syndrome A Rare Case Report A Recurrent Giant Phyllodes Tumor with Review of Literatures Microperforate Hymen Presenting as Vaginismus: Management and Literature Review Management Outcome and Associated Factors of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College and Tirunesh Beijing Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1