Placebo-controlled study of ABT-200 versus fluoxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder

Depression Pub Date : 1995-01-01 DOI:10.1002/depr.3050030407
John J. Sramek Pharm.D., Kenneth Kashkin M.D., Olga Jasinsky, David Kardatzke Ph.D., Sara Kennedy B.A., Neal R. Cutler M.D.
{"title":"Placebo-controlled study of ABT-200 versus fluoxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder","authors":"John J. Sramek Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kenneth Kashkin M.D.,&nbsp;Olga Jasinsky,&nbsp;David Kardatzke Ph.D.,&nbsp;Sara Kennedy B.A.,&nbsp;Neal R. Cutler M.D.","doi":"10.1002/depr.3050030407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>ABT-200 is a novel potential antidepressant which antagonizes both norepi-nephrine uptake and noradrenergic a<sub>2</sub> receptors. This single-site study conducted over 5 months compared the safely and efficacy of ABT-200 (titrated up to 280 mg/day) to a fixed dose offluoxetine (20 mg/day) and placebo in 216 patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder. Following a 1-week placebo lead-in phase, patients were randomized to receive ABT-200 (n = 72), fluoxetine (n = 72), or placebo (n = 72) for 9 weeks of double-blind treatment. At the end of the study there were no differences (P &gt; 0.05) in HAM-D total score changes from baseline between ABT-200-treated and placebo-treated patients, whose mean scores were reduced by 4.6 points (16.8%) and 6.4 points (23.3%), respectively. Patients on fluoxetine, however, showed statistically significant improvement over placebo on total HAM-D scores with a decrease of 8.6 points (30.5%,P &lt; 0.05). While there were no serious adverse events thought to be related to the study drug, 36.1% of ABT-200 patients discontinued the study due to adverse events, compared to only 5.6% of placebo patients and 4.2% offluoxetine patients. If ABT-200 produced the spectrum of biochemical effects in humans predicted from preclinical studies, our results suggest that these actions do not lead to antidepressant effects in general depressed outpatient populations. Depression 3:199–203 (1995). © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</p>","PeriodicalId":11179,"journal":{"name":"Depression","volume":"3 4","pages":"199-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/depr.3050030407","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/depr.3050030407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABT-200 is a novel potential antidepressant which antagonizes both norepi-nephrine uptake and noradrenergic a2 receptors. This single-site study conducted over 5 months compared the safely and efficacy of ABT-200 (titrated up to 280 mg/day) to a fixed dose offluoxetine (20 mg/day) and placebo in 216 patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder. Following a 1-week placebo lead-in phase, patients were randomized to receive ABT-200 (n = 72), fluoxetine (n = 72), or placebo (n = 72) for 9 weeks of double-blind treatment. At the end of the study there were no differences (P > 0.05) in HAM-D total score changes from baseline between ABT-200-treated and placebo-treated patients, whose mean scores were reduced by 4.6 points (16.8%) and 6.4 points (23.3%), respectively. Patients on fluoxetine, however, showed statistically significant improvement over placebo on total HAM-D scores with a decrease of 8.6 points (30.5%,P < 0.05). While there were no serious adverse events thought to be related to the study drug, 36.1% of ABT-200 patients discontinued the study due to adverse events, compared to only 5.6% of placebo patients and 4.2% offluoxetine patients. If ABT-200 produced the spectrum of biochemical effects in humans predicted from preclinical studies, our results suggest that these actions do not lead to antidepressant effects in general depressed outpatient populations. Depression 3:199–203 (1995). © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ABT-200与氟西汀治疗重度抑郁症的安慰剂对照研究
ABT-200是一种新型的潜在抗抑郁药,可拮抗去甲肾上腺素摄取和去甲肾上腺素能a2受体。这项为期5个月的单点研究在216例符合DSM-III-R重度抑郁症标准的患者中,比较了ABT-200(滴定至280 mg/天)与固定剂量的氟西汀(20 mg/天)和安慰剂的安全性和有效性。在为期1周的安慰剂引入期之后,患者被随机分为ABT-200 (n = 72)、氟西汀(n = 72)或安慰剂(n = 72),进行为期9周的双盲治疗。在研究结束时,没有任何差异(P >abt -200治疗组和安慰剂治疗组的HAM-D总分与基线相比,分别降低了4.6分(16.8%)和6.4分(23.3%)。然而,与安慰剂相比,氟西汀组患者在HAM-D总分上的改善具有统计学意义,降低8.6分(30.5%,P <0.05)。虽然没有与研究药物相关的严重不良事件,但36.1%的ABT-200患者因不良事件终止了研究,而安慰剂患者和氟西汀患者的这一比例分别为5.6%和4.2%。如果ABT-200产生临床前研究预测的人类生化效应谱,我们的结果表明,这些作用不会导致一般抑郁症门诊人群的抗抑郁作用。抑郁症:199 - 203(1995)。©1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Depression Throughout the Life Course Charting a New Future for Depression What Can the Depressed Person do for Themself? Environmental and Psychological Contributions to Depression The Prevalence of Depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1