A trap when using common key phrases

M. Abe
{"title":"A trap when using common key phrases","authors":"M. Abe","doi":"10.7880/ABAS.0200903A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been reported that the use of key phrases that all staff share a common understanding of is effective for integration inside an organization. At the Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, however, integration failed due to the long-standing use of the terms “for the patient” and “patient first.” The staff had assigned different meanings depending on their profession to these terms based on which they had built successful track records for their profession. That experience acted as an inertia preventing changes in attitudes and behaviors and ended up accelerating individually optimal activities for each profession. It is not merely a matter of staff across units simply using the same key phrases; it is important to reduce the ambiguity of the key phrases through behavior.","PeriodicalId":52658,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Business Administrative Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Business Administrative Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7880/ABAS.0200903A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It has been reported that the use of key phrases that all staff share a common understanding of is effective for integration inside an organization. At the Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, however, integration failed due to the long-standing use of the terms “for the patient” and “patient first.” The staff had assigned different meanings depending on their profession to these terms based on which they had built successful track records for their profession. That experience acted as an inertia preventing changes in attitudes and behaviors and ended up accelerating individually optimal activities for each profession. It is not merely a matter of staff across units simply using the same key phrases; it is important to reduce the ambiguity of the key phrases through behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用常用关键短语时的陷阱
据报道,使用所有员工都有共同理解的关键短语对组织内部的整合是有效的。然而,在Rakuwakai Otowa医院,由于长期使用“为患者”和“患者优先”的术语,整合失败了。工作人员根据他们的专业赋予这些术语不同的含义,并以此为基础为他们的专业建立了成功的记录。这种经历就像一种惯性,阻止了态度和行为的改变,最终加速了每个职业各自的最佳活动。这不仅仅是跨部门员工使用相同关键短语的问题;通过行为来减少关键短语的歧义是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
The type of network structure to target varies depending on the stage of advertising objectives Adjusting the ratio between idea-driven development and data-driven development in product updates Interdependence in buyer–supplier relationships An encounter with the Nadler–Tushman congruence model and organizational ambidexterity On the “yarisugoshi” phenomenon found in the situation where “decision making by flight” of the garbage can model occurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1