Harris Gadih Pratomo, Endah Mardiati, E. S. Soemantri, I. A. Evangelina
{"title":"Deflection test on different orthodontic wire materials sized 0.016 x 0.022 inches","authors":"Harris Gadih Pratomo, Endah Mardiati, E. S. Soemantri, I. A. Evangelina","doi":"10.22146/majkedgiind.31236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of technology in orthodontic field produces some orthodontic wires that have different deflection abilities. Loading force is the force needed to place an orthodontic wire in bracket slot (activation). Unloading force is the force produced by an orthodontic wire to move tooth (deactivation). Deflection test with three-point bending technique is a technique that is often used to determine the magnitude of the activation and deactivation force of orthodontic wire. Stainless steel (SS), nickel titanium (NiTi), copper nickel titanium (CuNiTi), and beta titanium (TMA), are the types of frequently used wires. This study aimed to compare loading and unloading force on the deflection test of SS, NiTi, CuNiTi, and TMA orthodontic wires sized 0.016 x 0.022 inch on the load-deflection graph. This is a laboratoryexperimental research on a total of 16 pieces of SS, NiTi, CuNiTi, and TMA orthodontic wires sized 0.016 x 0.022 inches. The group was divided based on the type of material. The deflection test was performed using a universal testing machine with a press speed of 5 mm/minute. Loading and unloading forces were recorded on deflections of 0.5; 1; and1.5 mm. Statistical tests of differences among groups were carried out by ANOVA analysis (p-value ≤ 0.05) and post-hoc analysis with T-test. There were significant differences in the loading and unloading forces recorded on deflections of 0.5; 1; and 1.5 mm; except for deflections of 0.5 mm of the SS and nickel-titanium wires. The wire deflection force fromthe lowest to the highest was CuNiTi wire, nickel-titanium wire, TMA wire, and stainless-steel wire.","PeriodicalId":31262,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/majkedgiind.31236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The development of technology in orthodontic field produces some orthodontic wires that have different deflection abilities. Loading force is the force needed to place an orthodontic wire in bracket slot (activation). Unloading force is the force produced by an orthodontic wire to move tooth (deactivation). Deflection test with three-point bending technique is a technique that is often used to determine the magnitude of the activation and deactivation force of orthodontic wire. Stainless steel (SS), nickel titanium (NiTi), copper nickel titanium (CuNiTi), and beta titanium (TMA), are the types of frequently used wires. This study aimed to compare loading and unloading force on the deflection test of SS, NiTi, CuNiTi, and TMA orthodontic wires sized 0.016 x 0.022 inch on the load-deflection graph. This is a laboratoryexperimental research on a total of 16 pieces of SS, NiTi, CuNiTi, and TMA orthodontic wires sized 0.016 x 0.022 inches. The group was divided based on the type of material. The deflection test was performed using a universal testing machine with a press speed of 5 mm/minute. Loading and unloading forces were recorded on deflections of 0.5; 1; and1.5 mm. Statistical tests of differences among groups were carried out by ANOVA analysis (p-value ≤ 0.05) and post-hoc analysis with T-test. There were significant differences in the loading and unloading forces recorded on deflections of 0.5; 1; and 1.5 mm; except for deflections of 0.5 mm of the SS and nickel-titanium wires. The wire deflection force fromthe lowest to the highest was CuNiTi wire, nickel-titanium wire, TMA wire, and stainless-steel wire.
随着正畸领域技术的发展,产生了一些具有不同偏转能力的正畸线。加载力是将正畸金属丝放入托槽(激活)所需的力。卸荷力是正畸金属丝移动牙齿(使牙齿失活)所产生的力。三点弯曲法挠度试验是测定正畸丝激活和失活力大小的常用方法。不锈钢(SS)、镍钛(NiTi)、铜镍钛(CuNiTi)和β钛(TMA)是常用的金属丝类型。本研究旨在比较0.016 x 0.022英寸尺寸的SS、NiTi、CuNiTi和TMA正畸丝在载荷-挠度图上的载荷和卸载挠度试验力。这是一项共16根尺寸为0.016 x 0.022英寸的SS、NiTi、CuNiTi和TMA正畸金属丝的实验室实验研究。这组人是根据材料的类型来划分的。挠度试验采用万能试验机,压速为5mm /分钟。在挠度为0.5时记录加载和卸载力;1;and1.5毫米。组间差异的统计检验采用方差分析(p值≤0.05),事后分析采用t检验。在挠度为0.5时记录的加载和卸载力有显著差异;1;1.5 mm;除了SS线和镍钛线的0.5 mm偏转。线材挠曲力由低到高依次为CuNiTi丝、镍钛丝、TMA丝、不锈钢丝。