A note on the social efficiency of free entry in Cournot oligopoly in a pure network goods market

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Manchester School Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI:10.1111/manc.12447
Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu
{"title":"A note on the social efficiency of free entry in Cournot oligopoly in a pure network goods market","authors":"Tsuyoshi Toshimitsu","doi":"10.1111/manc.12447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We explore the social efficiency of free entry in a pure network goods market where Cournot oligopolistic competition prevails and consumers have passive expectations. Focusing on network compatibility between firms, we consider the cases of two network systems: a firm-specific system and a single industry-wide network system. We demonstrate the following results. In the firm-specific network system, the number of firms under free entry is socially excessive compared with the second-best criteria. However, in the single industry-wide network system, if the elasticity of network effects in relation to the expected network sizes is sufficiently large, the number of firms under free entry is socially insufficient compared with the second-best criteria. Otherwise, socially excessive entry arises. We also examine the same issue in the case of a mixed network goods market.</p>","PeriodicalId":47546,"journal":{"name":"Manchester School","volume":"92 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manchester School","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/manc.12447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explore the social efficiency of free entry in a pure network goods market where Cournot oligopolistic competition prevails and consumers have passive expectations. Focusing on network compatibility between firms, we consider the cases of two network systems: a firm-specific system and a single industry-wide network system. We demonstrate the following results. In the firm-specific network system, the number of firms under free entry is socially excessive compared with the second-best criteria. However, in the single industry-wide network system, if the elasticity of network effects in relation to the expected network sizes is sufficiently large, the number of firms under free entry is socially insufficient compared with the second-best criteria. Otherwise, socially excessive entry arises. We also examine the same issue in the case of a mixed network goods market.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论纯网络商品市场中古诺寡头垄断的自由进入的社会效率
我们探讨了在古诺寡头垄断竞争盛行、消费者有被动预期的纯网络商品市场中自由进入的社会效率。关注企业之间的网络兼容性,我们考虑两种网络系统的情况:一个企业特定的系统和一个单一的行业范围的网络系统。我们演示了以下结果。在企业特定网络系统中,与次优标准相比,自由进入的企业数量在社会上是过多的。然而,在单一的全行业网络系统中,如果网络效应的弹性相对于预期的网络规模足够大,那么与次优标准相比,自由进入下的企业数量在社会上是不足的。否则,就会出现社会过度进入。我们还在混合网络商品市场的情况下研究了同样的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Manchester School
Manchester School ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Manchester School was first published more than seventy years ago and has become a distinguished, internationally recognised, general economics journal. The Manchester School publishes high-quality research covering all areas of the economics discipline, although the editors particularly encourage original contributions, or authoritative surveys, in the fields of microeconomics (including industrial organisation and game theory), macroeconomics, econometrics (both theory and applied) and labour economics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Robots at work: New evidence with recent data Issue Information Strategic advertising in the aftermath of a corporate scandal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1