{"title":"Comparison of equations for the calculation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in thai population","authors":"L. Rerksuppaphol, S. Rerksuppaphol","doi":"10.4103/jnsbm.jnsbm_53_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been established as a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Various equations have been proposed for LDL-C calculation; however, the accuracy of these equations varies among different ethnicities. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and concordance of LDL-C equations for dyslipidemia classifications in Thai adults. Materials and Methods: The lipid profiles of 1091 healthy Thai adults were measured using a homogenous enzymatic assay. The estimated LDL-C equations by Friedewald, Ahmadi, Anandaraja, Chen, Cordova, Densethakul, Hattori, Martin, Puavillai, Sampson, and Vujovic were compared to directly measured LDL-C using Pearson's correlation test. Cohen's kappa statistic was also used to test the concordance of the LDL-C equations with directly measured LDL-C levels, according to the standard guidelines for blood cholesterol management. Results: The LDL-C values calculated by Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed a high degree of correlation and values close to directly measured LDL-C levels with mean differences ranging from − 0.04 to 0.07 mmol/L. All these three equations had a high degree of concordances with directly measured LDL-C levels for classifying the degree of dyslipidemia. Conclusion: Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed better estimations of LDL-C levels and had higher accuracy in classifying the degree of LDL-C strata than other equations in the Thai population.","PeriodicalId":16373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"224 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsbm.jnsbm_53_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been established as a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Various equations have been proposed for LDL-C calculation; however, the accuracy of these equations varies among different ethnicities. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and concordance of LDL-C equations for dyslipidemia classifications in Thai adults. Materials and Methods: The lipid profiles of 1091 healthy Thai adults were measured using a homogenous enzymatic assay. The estimated LDL-C equations by Friedewald, Ahmadi, Anandaraja, Chen, Cordova, Densethakul, Hattori, Martin, Puavillai, Sampson, and Vujovic were compared to directly measured LDL-C using Pearson's correlation test. Cohen's kappa statistic was also used to test the concordance of the LDL-C equations with directly measured LDL-C levels, according to the standard guidelines for blood cholesterol management. Results: The LDL-C values calculated by Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed a high degree of correlation and values close to directly measured LDL-C levels with mean differences ranging from − 0.04 to 0.07 mmol/L. All these three equations had a high degree of concordances with directly measured LDL-C levels for classifying the degree of dyslipidemia. Conclusion: Friedewald, Sampson, and Chen equations showed better estimations of LDL-C levels and had higher accuracy in classifying the degree of LDL-C strata than other equations in the Thai population.