The Effect of Motivated Reasoning and Dissent on Information Search and Strategy Evaluation Using Balanced Scorecard: An Eye-Tracking Study

Tota Panggabean, Yasheng Chen, Johnny Jermias
{"title":"The Effect of Motivated Reasoning and Dissent on Information Search and Strategy Evaluation Using Balanced Scorecard: An Eye-Tracking Study","authors":"Tota Panggabean, Yasheng Chen, Johnny Jermias","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2900512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use an eye-tracking device to measure information search behavior of individuals while evaluating Balanced Scorecard data. We showed that participants who were involved in the initial implementation of BSC were motivated to search for information in a more directive way, compared to those who were not involved in the implementation. We also showed that individuals who receive a dissenting opinion access a wider range of information by employing a sequential search. We discovered that individuals who employed a directive search were more likely to rate the new strategy as a success than those who employed a sequential search.","PeriodicalId":8737,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral & Experimental Accounting eJournal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral & Experimental Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2900512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use an eye-tracking device to measure information search behavior of individuals while evaluating Balanced Scorecard data. We showed that participants who were involved in the initial implementation of BSC were motivated to search for information in a more directive way, compared to those who were not involved in the implementation. We also showed that individuals who receive a dissenting opinion access a wider range of information by employing a sequential search. We discovered that individuals who employed a directive search were more likely to rate the new strategy as a success than those who employed a sequential search.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动机推理和异议对平衡计分卡信息搜索和策略评价的影响:眼动追踪研究
在评估平衡计分卡数据时,我们使用眼动追踪设备来测量个人的信息搜索行为。我们发现,与没有参与平衡计分卡实施的参与者相比,参与平衡计分卡最初实施的参与者更有动力以一种更直接的方式搜索信息。我们还表明,接受不同意见的个人通过采用顺序搜索来获取更广泛的信息。我们发现,使用指令搜索的人比使用顺序搜索的人更有可能将新策略评为成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Don’t shoot yourself in the foot! A (real-effort task) experiment on income redistribution and voting. Causal Attribution, Benefits Sharing, and Earnings Management Sleep Debt and Information Processing in Financial Markets Game Changer: Can Modifications to Audit Firm Communication Improve Auditors’ Actions in Response to Heightened Fraud Risk? Retail Bond Investors and Credit Ratings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1