The First Sovereign Pari Passu? It's All Scottish to Me

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW American Bankruptcy Law Journal Pub Date : 2015-09-19 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2662851
Pablo Triana
{"title":"The First Sovereign Pari Passu? It's All Scottish to Me","authors":"Pablo Triana","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2662851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I found an 1838 legal document pertaining to debt obligations by a sovereign entity (the City of Edinburgh) that contains a pari passu clause. The clause wording itself is very basic (\"rank pari passu\") but both the texture of the case and the consequent related possible interpretation of pari passu would not be simplistic. While it may be hard to say for certain, this ancient pari passu (the \"oldest\" sovereign one on public record, seemingly) may be endowed with the intriguing characteristic of referring to inter-creditor payment parity, and not just legal rank parity (though, again, no explicit mention of payments appears in the clause text itself). If true, this would imply that at least some people saw pari passu as a promise to be paid equally, at the same time and possibly proportionally as the relevant others, long before New York judge Thomas Griesa embraced such interpretation in 2012 to the utter surprise and shock of most sovereign debt legal practitioners and scholars. If my elucubrations are correct, and that might be a long shot, we would have unearthed a primeval pari passu that´s endowed with a message that would be most unwelcome to most of today´s experts. If, as contract paleontologists posit, the key to understanding pari passu is to find its original meaning, the 19th century Edinburgh version may not be possesed with the most instructive purport.","PeriodicalId":44862,"journal":{"name":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2662851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I found an 1838 legal document pertaining to debt obligations by a sovereign entity (the City of Edinburgh) that contains a pari passu clause. The clause wording itself is very basic ("rank pari passu") but both the texture of the case and the consequent related possible interpretation of pari passu would not be simplistic. While it may be hard to say for certain, this ancient pari passu (the "oldest" sovereign one on public record, seemingly) may be endowed with the intriguing characteristic of referring to inter-creditor payment parity, and not just legal rank parity (though, again, no explicit mention of payments appears in the clause text itself). If true, this would imply that at least some people saw pari passu as a promise to be paid equally, at the same time and possibly proportionally as the relevant others, long before New York judge Thomas Griesa embraced such interpretation in 2012 to the utter surprise and shock of most sovereign debt legal practitioners and scholars. If my elucubrations are correct, and that might be a long shot, we would have unearthed a primeval pari passu that´s endowed with a message that would be most unwelcome to most of today´s experts. If, as contract paleontologists posit, the key to understanding pari passu is to find its original meaning, the 19th century Edinburgh version may not be possesed with the most instructive purport.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一君主帕里帕苏?对我来说都是苏格兰式的
我找到了一份1838年的法律文件,涉及主权实体(爱丁堡市)的债务义务,其中包含一个同等权益条款。该条款的措辞本身是非常基本的(“同等权利”),但案件的结构和随后对同等权利的相关可能解释都不会过于简单化。虽然可能很难确定,但这个古老的pari passu(似乎是公开记录中“最古老的”主权)可能被赋予了一个有趣的特征,即指债权人之间的支付平价,而不仅仅是法律级别平价(尽管条款文本本身没有明确提到支付)。如果这是真的,这将意味着至少有一些人将同等待遇视为一种承诺,即与相关的其他人在同一时间、可能按比例获得同等报酬。早在纽约法官托马斯•格里萨(Thomas Griesa)在2012年接受这种解释之前,这种解释就让大多数主权债务法律从业者和学者感到非常惊讶和震惊。如果我的解释是正确的(这可能是一个很渺茫的机会),我们将发现一个原始的pari passu,它被赋予了一个对今天的大多数专家来说最不受欢迎的信息。如果像合同古生物学家所假定的那样,理解同等权利的关键是找到它的原意,那么19世纪爱丁堡的版本可能并不具有最具启发性的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Steering Loan Modifications Post-Pandemic Passing the Parcel? Relationship Banking at the Onset of Financial Distress Treatment of Disputed Claims in Corporate Insolvency: Evolving Jurisprudence Paper Series VII - Arrangements and Compromise Government Activism in Bankruptcy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1