METAMODELING CHOICES FOR SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BRB-RETROFITTED LOW-DUCTILITY RC FRAMES

J. Ghosh, F. Freddi
{"title":"METAMODELING CHOICES FOR SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BRB-RETROFITTED LOW-DUCTILITY RC FRAMES","authors":"J. Ghosh, F. Freddi","doi":"10.7712/120121.8768.19307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Damage incurred in low-ductility reinforced concrete (RC) buildings during recent earthquakes continues to underline their structural vulnerability under seismic shaking. Among the viable seismic retrofitting procedures, passive control systems such as buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) have emerged as an efficient strategy for structural damage mitigation through stable energy dissipation while providing additional strength and stiffness to low-ductility buildings. Although quantifying the beneficial effects of BRBs for vulnerability reduction through seismic fragility curves has been suitably investigated in literature, almost all such studies consider a deterministic description of the BRB device. This study illustrates a metamodeling framework rooted in statistical learning techniques for efficient seismic vulnerability assessment of BRB-retrofitted low-ductility RC frames. The framework develops multidimensional probabilistic seismic demand models for response prediction of a case study retrofitted frames as a function of ground motion characteristics as well as the design parameters of the BRB device. These demand models when compared against damage states capacity estimates subsequently yields vector-based seismic fragility functions that provide notable advantages over unidimensional fragility curves in terms of efficiency as well as generality. Additionally, uncertainties stemming from a multitude of sources can also be conveniently captured and propagated through the different stages of statistical model development. The proposed study aims to help researchers, stakeholders, and even device manufactures by providing a conven-ient tool for vulnerability evaluation of retrofitted structures with reasonable accuracy and enhanced efficiency of computation. Concrete Frames, Seismic Retrofit, Seismic Devices Uncertainty, Metamodeling.","PeriodicalId":66281,"journal":{"name":"地震工程与工程振动","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"地震工程与工程振动","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7712/120121.8768.19307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Damage incurred in low-ductility reinforced concrete (RC) buildings during recent earthquakes continues to underline their structural vulnerability under seismic shaking. Among the viable seismic retrofitting procedures, passive control systems such as buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) have emerged as an efficient strategy for structural damage mitigation through stable energy dissipation while providing additional strength and stiffness to low-ductility buildings. Although quantifying the beneficial effects of BRBs for vulnerability reduction through seismic fragility curves has been suitably investigated in literature, almost all such studies consider a deterministic description of the BRB device. This study illustrates a metamodeling framework rooted in statistical learning techniques for efficient seismic vulnerability assessment of BRB-retrofitted low-ductility RC frames. The framework develops multidimensional probabilistic seismic demand models for response prediction of a case study retrofitted frames as a function of ground motion characteristics as well as the design parameters of the BRB device. These demand models when compared against damage states capacity estimates subsequently yields vector-based seismic fragility functions that provide notable advantages over unidimensional fragility curves in terms of efficiency as well as generality. Additionally, uncertainties stemming from a multitude of sources can also be conveniently captured and propagated through the different stages of statistical model development. The proposed study aims to help researchers, stakeholders, and even device manufactures by providing a conven-ient tool for vulnerability evaluation of retrofitted structures with reasonable accuracy and enhanced efficiency of computation. Concrete Frames, Seismic Retrofit, Seismic Devices Uncertainty, Metamodeling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
brb加固低延性钢筋混凝土框架地震易损性评估的元模型选择
在最近的地震中,低延性钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑所遭受的破坏继续凸显了其结构在地震震动下的脆弱性。在可行的抗震改造程序中,被动控制系统,如抗屈曲支撑(brb)已经成为一种有效的策略,通过稳定的能量耗散来减轻结构损伤,同时为低延性建筑提供额外的强度和刚度。虽然已有文献对通过地震易损性曲线量化BRB对减少易损性的有益影响进行了适当的研究,但几乎所有此类研究都考虑了BRB装置的确定性描述。本研究阐述了基于统计学习技术的元建模框架,用于对brb改造的低延性RC框架进行有效的地震易损性评估。该框架开发了多维概率地震需求模型,用于案例研究的响应预测,作为地面运动特征和BRB装置设计参数的函数。将这些需求模型与损伤状态容量估计进行比较后,可以得到基于矢量的地震易损性函数,与一维易损性曲线相比,在效率和通用性方面具有显著优势。此外,来自众多来源的不确定性也可以方便地捕获并通过统计模型开发的不同阶段传播。本研究旨在为研究人员、利益相关者甚至设备制造商提供一种方便的工具,以合理的精度和提高的计算效率进行改造结构的脆弱性评估。混凝土框架,抗震改造,地震装置不确定性,元模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4781
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
GENETIC OPTIMIZATION FOR THE DESIGN OF SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF PLANE RC FRAMES WITH BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES (BRBS) LARGE-DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY STRUCTURES: COMPARISON BETWEEN ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS AND DEM MODELS INCLUDING OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE CYCLIC TESTING OF 1:40 SCALE CANTILEVER RC ELEMENTS WITH DIGITALLY MANUFACTURED REINFORCEMENT 3D ROCKING MOTION: BLIND PREDICTION CONTEST RESULTS AND INFLUENCE OF EVALUATION METRIC ON THE RANKINGS EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PLASTIC CYCLIC BEHAVIOUR OF SIMPLE STEEL COUPONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1