Psychosocial meaning making in carceral spaces: a case study of prison and mental health care practice

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Psychosocial Studies Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1332/147867321X16215933279607
Andrew Shepherd
{"title":"Psychosocial meaning making in carceral spaces: a case study of prison and mental health care practice","authors":"Andrew Shepherd","doi":"10.1332/147867321X16215933279607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prisons represent sites of psychological distress and suffering. In this article, the implications of this, and the need for the maintenance of a psychosocial perspective, are explored. A psychogeographic overview of the prison environment is provided to consider the way it is constituted\n at different levels: the macro-social, meso-social and micro-social levels. Two vignettes are presented, which illustrate the process of loss and emergent self-destruction accompanying an enforced identity change followed by the radical means of stabilisation that may be adopted in opposition\n to this process. The essential nature of personal narrative construction ‐ this process of sense making ‐ is considered alongside the forcing impact of the social environment, as well as wider social pressures, and their impact on the dynamic process. In closing, a limitation\n of the employed methodology ‐ focusing on individual experience ‐ is remarked on: if these psychological processes take place through an act of modulation in response to a social field, how does the social field in turn respond to these modulations? In closing, I argue that through\n maintaining a psychosocial focus, researchers and clinicians discharge an ethical duty to maintain the attention of society on the suffering of some of its most vulnerable members.","PeriodicalId":29710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/147867321X16215933279607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prisons represent sites of psychological distress and suffering. In this article, the implications of this, and the need for the maintenance of a psychosocial perspective, are explored. A psychogeographic overview of the prison environment is provided to consider the way it is constituted at different levels: the macro-social, meso-social and micro-social levels. Two vignettes are presented, which illustrate the process of loss and emergent self-destruction accompanying an enforced identity change followed by the radical means of stabilisation that may be adopted in opposition to this process. The essential nature of personal narrative construction ‐ this process of sense making ‐ is considered alongside the forcing impact of the social environment, as well as wider social pressures, and their impact on the dynamic process. In closing, a limitation of the employed methodology ‐ focusing on individual experience ‐ is remarked on: if these psychological processes take place through an act of modulation in response to a social field, how does the social field in turn respond to these modulations? In closing, I argue that through maintaining a psychosocial focus, researchers and clinicians discharge an ethical duty to maintain the attention of society on the suffering of some of its most vulnerable members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监狱空间的社会心理意义建构:监狱与精神卫生保健实践案例研究
监狱是造成心理痛苦和痛苦的场所。在这篇文章中,探讨了这一点的含义,以及维护社会心理观点的必要性。本文提供了监狱环境的心理地理概况,以考虑监狱环境在宏观社会、中社会和微观社会等不同层次上的构成方式。呈现了两幅小插图,它们说明了失落和紧急自我毁灭的过程,伴随着强制的身份变化,随后可能采用与此过程相反的激进的稳定手段。个人叙事建构的本质——这种意义建构的过程——与社会环境的强制影响以及更广泛的社会压力以及它们对动态过程的影响一起被考虑。最后,所采用的方法的一个局限性——专注于个人经验——被指出:如果这些心理过程是通过对社会领域的调节行为发生的,那么社会领域如何反过来对这些调节做出反应?最后,我认为,通过保持对社会心理的关注,研究人员和临床医生履行了一种道德责任,即保持社会对一些最脆弱成员的痛苦的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can religion be rescued in the 21st century? On Erich Fromm’s religious humanism in an age of authoritarian populism Racial trauma as an unlaid ghost of empire The haunting melody of loss in the racist imagination Racism, hatred and melancholic curiosity Stoking hate: configuring loss in explanations of racially aggravated crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1