Evaluating Efficiency of Surfactant-Polymer Flooding with Single Well Chemical Tracer Tests at Kholmogorskoye Field

M. Bondar, Andrey B. Osipov, A. Groman, I. Koltsov, G. Shcherbakov, S. Milchakov
{"title":"Evaluating Efficiency of Surfactant-Polymer Flooding with Single Well Chemical Tracer Tests at Kholmogorskoye Field","authors":"M. Bondar, Andrey B. Osipov, A. Groman, I. Koltsov, G. Shcherbakov, S. Milchakov","doi":"10.2118/207314-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n EOR technologies in general and surfactant-polymer flooding (SP) in particular is considered as a tertiary method for redevelopment of mature oil fields in Western Siberia, with potential to increase oil recovery to 60-70% OOIP. The selection of effective surfactant blend and a polymer for SP flooding a complex and multi-stage process. The selected SP compositions were tested at Kholmogorskoye oilfield in September-December 2020. Two single well tests with partitioning chemical tracers (SWCTT) and the injectivity test were performed.\n The surfactant and the polymer for chemical EOR were selecting during laboratory studies. Thermal stability, phase behavior, interfacial tension and rheology of SP formulation were investigated, then a prospective chemical design was developed. Filtration experiments were carried out for optimization of slugs and concentrations. Then SWCTT was used to evaluated residual oil saturation after water flooding and after implementation of chemical EOR in the near wellbore areas. The difference between the obtained values is a measure of the efficiency of surfactant-polymer flooding. Pandemic restriction shifted SWCTT to the period when temperature dropped below zero and suitable for winter conditions equipment was required.\n Two SWCTT were conducted with same surfactant, but different design of slugs in order to prove technical and economic models of SP-flooding. Long-term polymer injectivity was accessed at the third well. Oil saturation of sandstone reservoir after the injection of a surfactant-polymer solution was reduced about 10% points which is around one third of the residual oil after water flooding. Results were compared with other available data such as well logging, lab core flooding experiments, and hydrodynamic simulation. Modeling of SWCTT is ongoing, current interpretation confirms the increase the oil recovery factor after SP-flooding up to 20-25%, which is a promising result.\n Temperature model of the bottom hole zone was created and verified. The model predicts that temperature of those zones essentially below that average in the reservoir, which is important for interpretation of tracer test and surfactant efficiency. The tested surfactant showed an acceptable efficiency at under-optimum conditions, which is favorable for application of the SP formulation for neighboring field and layers with different reservoir temperatures, but similar water composition. In general, the results of the conducted field tests correlate with the results of the core experiments for the selected surfactant","PeriodicalId":11069,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207314-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

EOR technologies in general and surfactant-polymer flooding (SP) in particular is considered as a tertiary method for redevelopment of mature oil fields in Western Siberia, with potential to increase oil recovery to 60-70% OOIP. The selection of effective surfactant blend and a polymer for SP flooding a complex and multi-stage process. The selected SP compositions were tested at Kholmogorskoye oilfield in September-December 2020. Two single well tests with partitioning chemical tracers (SWCTT) and the injectivity test were performed. The surfactant and the polymer for chemical EOR were selecting during laboratory studies. Thermal stability, phase behavior, interfacial tension and rheology of SP formulation were investigated, then a prospective chemical design was developed. Filtration experiments were carried out for optimization of slugs and concentrations. Then SWCTT was used to evaluated residual oil saturation after water flooding and after implementation of chemical EOR in the near wellbore areas. The difference between the obtained values is a measure of the efficiency of surfactant-polymer flooding. Pandemic restriction shifted SWCTT to the period when temperature dropped below zero and suitable for winter conditions equipment was required. Two SWCTT were conducted with same surfactant, but different design of slugs in order to prove technical and economic models of SP-flooding. Long-term polymer injectivity was accessed at the third well. Oil saturation of sandstone reservoir after the injection of a surfactant-polymer solution was reduced about 10% points which is around one third of the residual oil after water flooding. Results were compared with other available data such as well logging, lab core flooding experiments, and hydrodynamic simulation. Modeling of SWCTT is ongoing, current interpretation confirms the increase the oil recovery factor after SP-flooding up to 20-25%, which is a promising result. Temperature model of the bottom hole zone was created and verified. The model predicts that temperature of those zones essentially below that average in the reservoir, which is important for interpretation of tracer test and surfactant efficiency. The tested surfactant showed an acceptable efficiency at under-optimum conditions, which is favorable for application of the SP formulation for neighboring field and layers with different reservoir temperatures, but similar water composition. In general, the results of the conducted field tests correlate with the results of the core experiments for the selected surfactant
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kholmogorskoye油田单井化学示踪剂试验评价表面活性剂-聚合物驱效果
一般来说,EOR技术,特别是表面活性剂聚合物驱(SP),被认为是西西伯利亚成熟油田再开发的第三种方法,有可能将石油采收率提高到60-70% OOIP。SP驱用有效表面活性剂共混物和聚合物的选择是一个复杂的多阶段过程。2020年9月至12月,在Kholmogorskoye油田对选定的SP成分进行了测试。进行了两次单井测试,分别使用了化学示踪剂(SWCTT)和注入能力测试。对化学提高采收率的表面活性剂和聚合物进行了实验室选择。研究了SP配方的热稳定性、相行为、界面张力和流变性,并进行了前瞻性的化学设计。进行了过滤实验,优化了渣段和浓度。然后利用SWCTT对近井区水驱和化学提高采收率后的剩余油饱和度进行评价。所得值之间的差异是衡量表面活性剂-聚合物驱效率的指标。大流行限制将SWCTT转移到温度降至零度以下并适合冬季条件的时期。为了验证sp驱的技术经济模型,采用相同表面活性剂、不同设计的段塞进行了两次SWCTT试验。在第三口井获得了长期聚合物注入能力。注入表面活性剂-聚合物溶液后,砂岩储层的含油饱和度降低了约10%,约为水驱后剩余油的三分之一。结果与其他可用数据(如测井、岩心驱替实验和流体动力学模拟)进行了比较。SWCTT的建模正在进行中,目前的解释证实sp驱后的采收率提高了20-25%,这是一个很有希望的结果。建立了井底区域温度模型并进行了验证。该模型预测这些区域的温度基本低于油藏的平均温度,这对于解释示踪剂测试和表面活性剂的效率非常重要。所测表面活性剂在非最佳条件下具有良好的效率,有利于SP配方在相邻油田和储层温度不同但水成分相似的地层的应用。一般来说,现场试验的结果与所选表面活性剂岩心试验的结果相一致
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Visualization of Oil Displacement by Foam in Porous Media Maximizing Condensate Recovery With Proven Cost Simulation for a Giant UAE Field: Base Study to Estimate Productivity between Horizontal and Vertical Wells Rationalization of Flares at Terminal Island A Geoengineering Approach to Maximum Reservoir Contact Wells Design: Case Study in a Carbonate Reservoir Under Water and Miscible Gas Injection Maximizing Brine Recovery After the Displacement of Reservoir Drill-in Fluids to Reduce Well Cost Via New, Alternate Technology In a Reservoir Offshore Abu Dhabi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1