Meaning differences between English clippings and their source words: A corpus-based study

M. Hilpert, D. Saavedra, Jennifer Rains
{"title":"Meaning differences between English clippings and their source words: A corpus-based study","authors":"M. Hilpert, D. Saavedra, Jennifer Rains","doi":"10.2478/icame-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper uses corpus data and methods of distributional semantics in order to study English clippings such as dorm (< dormitory), memo (< memorandum), or quake (< earthquake). We investigate whether systematic meaning differences between clippings and their source words can be detected. The analysis is based on a sample of 50 English clippings. Each of the clippings is represented by a concordance of 100 examples in context that were gathered from the Corpus of Contemporary American English. We compare clippings and their source words both at the aggregate level and in terms of comparisons between individual clippings and their source words. The data show that clippings tend to be used in contexts that represent involved text production, which aligns with the idea that clipped words signal familiarity with their referents. It is further observed that individual clippings and their source words partly diverge in their distributional profiles, reflecting both overlap and differences with regard to their meanings. We interpret these findings against the theoretical background of Construction Grammar and specifically the Principle of No Synonymy.","PeriodicalId":73271,"journal":{"name":"ICAME journal : computers in English linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICAME journal : computers in English linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper uses corpus data and methods of distributional semantics in order to study English clippings such as dorm (< dormitory), memo (< memorandum), or quake (< earthquake). We investigate whether systematic meaning differences between clippings and their source words can be detected. The analysis is based on a sample of 50 English clippings. Each of the clippings is represented by a concordance of 100 examples in context that were gathered from the Corpus of Contemporary American English. We compare clippings and their source words both at the aggregate level and in terms of comparisons between individual clippings and their source words. The data show that clippings tend to be used in contexts that represent involved text production, which aligns with the idea that clipped words signal familiarity with their referents. It is further observed that individual clippings and their source words partly diverge in their distributional profiles, reflecting both overlap and differences with regard to their meanings. We interpret these findings against the theoretical background of Construction Grammar and specifically the Principle of No Synonymy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于语料库的英语剪报与原词词义差异研究
摘要本文利用语料库数据和分布语义的方法,对英语剪报(dorm, < dorm)、备忘录(memo, < memorandum)、地震(quake, < earthquake)等进行了研究。我们研究是否可以检测到剪报与其源词之间的系统意义差异。这项分析是基于50份英国剪报的样本。每一个剪报都是由从当代美国英语语料库中收集的100个上下文例子的一致性代表的。我们既在总体水平上比较剪报和它们的源词,也在个别剪报和它们的源词之间进行比较。数据显示,剪接词往往用在表示涉及文本生产的语境中,这与剪接词表示对其所指物熟悉的观点一致。进一步观察到,个别剪报及其源词在其分布概况中存在部分差异,反映了其含义的重叠和差异。我们在构式语法的理论背景下,特别是在无同义原则的基础上解释这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ole Schützler and Julia Schlüter (eds.). Data and methods in corpus linguistics. Comparative approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 357 pp. ISBN 978-1-10849964-4 Compiling a corpus of South Asian online Englishes: A report, some reflections and a pilot study A comparative corpus-based investigation of results sections of research articles in Applied Linguistics and Physics Tony McEnery and Vaclav Brezina. Fundamental principles of corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 313 pp. ISBN 978-1-1071-1062-5 Gender and evaluation in contemporary American English: A corpus study based on pronominal and nominal expressions with male and female reference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1