Comparison of simultaneous arterial spin labeling MRI and 15O-H2O PET measurements of regional cerebral blood flow in rest and altered perfusion states

Oriol Puig, O. Henriksen, Mark B. Vestergaard, A. Hansen, F. Andersen, C. Ladefoged, E. Rostrup, H. Larsson, U. Lindberg, I. Law
{"title":"Comparison of simultaneous arterial spin labeling MRI and 15O-H2O PET measurements of regional cerebral blood flow in rest and altered perfusion states","authors":"Oriol Puig, O. Henriksen, Mark B. Vestergaard, A. Hansen, F. Andersen, C. Ladefoged, E. Rostrup, H. Larsson, U. Lindberg, I. Law","doi":"10.1177/0271678X19874643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arterial spin labelling (ASL) is a non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that may provide fully quantitative regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) images. However, before its application in clinical routine, ASL needs to be validated against the clinical gold standard, 15O-H2O positron emission tomography (PET). We aimed to compare the two techniques by performing simultaneous quantitative ASL-MRI and 15O-H2O-PET examinations in a hybrid PET/MRI scanner. Duplicate rCBF measurements were performed in healthy young subjects (n = 14) in rest, during hyperventilation, and after acetazolamide (post-ACZ), yielding 63 combined PET/MRI datasets in total. Average global CBF by ASL-MRI and 15O-H2O-PET was not significantly different in any state (40.0 ± 6.5 and 40.6 ± 4.1 mL/100 g/min, respectively in rest, 24.5 ± 5.1 and 23.4 ± 4.8 mL/100 g/min, respectively, during hyperventilation, and 59.1 ± 10.4 and 64.7 ± 10.0 mL/100 g/min, respectively, post-ACZ). Overall, strong correlation between the two methods was found across all states (slope = 1.01, R2 = 0.82), while the correlations within individual states and of reactivity measures were weaker, in particular in rest (R2 = 0.05, p = 0.03). Regional distribution was similar, although ASL yielded higher perfusion and absolute reactivity in highly vascularized areas. In conclusion, ASL-MRI and 15O-H2O-PET measurements of rCBF are highly correlated across different perfusion states, but with variable correlation within and between hemodynamic states, and systematic differences in regional distribution.","PeriodicalId":15356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X19874643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Arterial spin labelling (ASL) is a non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that may provide fully quantitative regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) images. However, before its application in clinical routine, ASL needs to be validated against the clinical gold standard, 15O-H2O positron emission tomography (PET). We aimed to compare the two techniques by performing simultaneous quantitative ASL-MRI and 15O-H2O-PET examinations in a hybrid PET/MRI scanner. Duplicate rCBF measurements were performed in healthy young subjects (n = 14) in rest, during hyperventilation, and after acetazolamide (post-ACZ), yielding 63 combined PET/MRI datasets in total. Average global CBF by ASL-MRI and 15O-H2O-PET was not significantly different in any state (40.0 ± 6.5 and 40.6 ± 4.1 mL/100 g/min, respectively in rest, 24.5 ± 5.1 and 23.4 ± 4.8 mL/100 g/min, respectively, during hyperventilation, and 59.1 ± 10.4 and 64.7 ± 10.0 mL/100 g/min, respectively, post-ACZ). Overall, strong correlation between the two methods was found across all states (slope = 1.01, R2 = 0.82), while the correlations within individual states and of reactivity measures were weaker, in particular in rest (R2 = 0.05, p = 0.03). Regional distribution was similar, although ASL yielded higher perfusion and absolute reactivity in highly vascularized areas. In conclusion, ASL-MRI and 15O-H2O-PET measurements of rCBF are highly correlated across different perfusion states, but with variable correlation within and between hemodynamic states, and systematic differences in regional distribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时动脉自旋标记MRI和15O-H2O PET测量休息和灌注改变状态下脑区域血流的比较
动脉自旋标记(ASL)是一种非侵入性磁共振成像(MRI)技术,可以提供完全定量的区域脑血流(rCBF)图像。然而,在应用于临床常规之前,ASL需要根据临床金标准15O-H2O正电子发射断层扫描(PET)进行验证。我们的目的是通过在混合PET/MRI扫描仪上同时进行定量ASL-MRI和15O-H2O-PET检查来比较这两种技术。在健康的年轻受试者(n = 14)中,分别在休息、过度通气和乙酰唑胺后(acz后)进行了重复的rCBF测量,共产生63个PET/MRI联合数据集。ASL-MRI和15O-H2O-PET的平均全脑CBF在任何状态下均无显著差异(休息时分别为40.0±6.5和40.6±4.1 mL/100 g/min,过度通气时分别为24.5±5.1和23.4±4.8 mL/100 g/min, acz后分别为59.1±10.4和64.7±10.0 mL/100 g/min)。总体而言,两种方法之间的相关性在所有状态中都很强(斜率= 1.01,R2 = 0.82),而单个状态和反应性测量之间的相关性较弱,特别是在休息状态下(R2 = 0.05, p = 0.03)。区域分布相似,尽管ASL在高度血管化的区域具有较高的灌注和绝对反应性。综上所述,ASL-MRI和15O-H2O-PET测量rCBF在不同灌注状态下高度相关,但血流动力学状态内和血流动力学状态之间存在变量相关性,区域分布存在系统性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orthostatic hypotension and cerebral small vessel disease: A systematic review Microglia contact cerebral vasculature through gaps between astrocyte endfeet Detectability of white matter cerebral blood flow using arterial spin labeling MRI in patients with sickle cell disease: Relevance of flow territory, bolus arrival time, and hematocrit The relative associations of aortic and carotid artery stiffness with CeVD and cognition Refined movement analysis in the Staircase test reveals differential motor deficits in mouse models of stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1