The Boundaries to Approve the Indisputability of the Claims in Bankruptcy Proceedings

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW American Bankruptcy Law Journal Pub Date : 2013-09-13 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2325680
Gor Samvel
{"title":"The Boundaries to Approve the Indisputability of the Claims in Bankruptcy Proceedings","authors":"Gor Samvel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2325680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Law on Bankruptcy of the Republic of Armenia (hence LBA or the Law) makes it possible to declare the debtor bankrupt and register creditor’s claim if the letter one entails from indisputable claims. Indeed, those indirect rules on approval of the claim in combination with the rules of moratorium apparently put the law enforcement practice either in non-conformity with the principal task of bankruptcy proceedings or deprive an entity from the right to fair trial (article 18, the Constitution of Armenia ). Though the court is vested only in to approve the indisputable nature of the claim, the law enforcement practice has drifted far from this crucial point of departure suggesting us entirely different case law practice. Needless to say, that this kind of case law is not in compliance with the features of bankruptcy proceedings, however it provides a reasonable opportunity to the potential creditors to resolve the dispute and to apply for the registration of relevant claim under the same bankruptcy procedure. And this is in the case when the potential creditor possesses no right to initiate a civil lawsuit under the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Armenia (hence CPC) given to the limitations existing as a part of moratorium.","PeriodicalId":44862,"journal":{"name":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2325680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Law on Bankruptcy of the Republic of Armenia (hence LBA or the Law) makes it possible to declare the debtor bankrupt and register creditor’s claim if the letter one entails from indisputable claims. Indeed, those indirect rules on approval of the claim in combination with the rules of moratorium apparently put the law enforcement practice either in non-conformity with the principal task of bankruptcy proceedings or deprive an entity from the right to fair trial (article 18, the Constitution of Armenia ). Though the court is vested only in to approve the indisputable nature of the claim, the law enforcement practice has drifted far from this crucial point of departure suggesting us entirely different case law practice. Needless to say, that this kind of case law is not in compliance with the features of bankruptcy proceedings, however it provides a reasonable opportunity to the potential creditors to resolve the dispute and to apply for the registration of relevant claim under the same bankruptcy procedure. And this is in the case when the potential creditor possesses no right to initiate a civil lawsuit under the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Armenia (hence CPC) given to the limitations existing as a part of moratorium.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认定破产程序债权不争性的界限
《亚美尼亚共和国破产法》(因此称为《LBA法》)规定,如果第一个字母来自无可争辩的索赔,则可以宣布债务人破产并登记债权人的索赔。事实上,这些关于核准索赔的间接规则加上暂停规则显然使执法做法不符合破产程序的主要任务,或剥夺实体获得公平审判的权利(《亚美尼亚宪法》第18条)。虽然法院的职责只是批准索赔的无可争辩的性质,但执法实践已经远离了这一关键的出发点,这给我们带来了完全不同的判例法实践。毋庸置疑,这种判例法并不符合破产程序的特点,但它为潜在债权人在同一破产程序下解决纠纷和申请相关债权登记提供了合理的机会。在这种情况下,潜在债权人没有权利根据《亚美尼亚共和国民事诉讼法》(即CPC)提起民事诉讼,因为作为暂停的一部分存在的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Steering Loan Modifications Post-Pandemic Passing the Parcel? Relationship Banking at the Onset of Financial Distress Treatment of Disputed Claims in Corporate Insolvency: Evolving Jurisprudence Paper Series VII - Arrangements and Compromise Government Activism in Bankruptcy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1