COMPARING TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF TRADITIONAL FLOODING AND DRIP IRRIGATION TECHNIQUES IN WATERMELON PRODUCTION IN TRA VINH PROVINCE

B. H. Duong, Tram Thi Nhat Tran, A. Nguyen
{"title":"COMPARING TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF TRADITIONAL FLOODING AND DRIP IRRIGATION TECHNIQUES IN WATERMELON PRODUCTION IN TRA VINH PROVINCE","authors":"B. H. Duong, Tram Thi Nhat Tran, A. Nguyen","doi":"10.35382/18594816.1.27.2017.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to compare the technical efficiency between two irrigation systems: traditional flooding and drip irrigation in watermelon production in Tra Vinh province, thereby recommending a more efficient farming model. This paper uses descriptive statistics, SFA and multivariable regression based on primary datacollected from 160 farmers applying these two irrigation models in Cau Ngang and Duyen Hai districts. The study found that the cost of plant variety, the amount of phosphorus, costs for post-harvesting, labor and irrigation affected the productivity of watermelon in the traditional flooding irrigation model; whereas the amount of potassium, the amount of phosphorus and cost of plant variety were factors affecting the productivity of watermelon in the drip irrigation model. Theresults also showed that producers applying the drip irrigation model achieved higher technical efficiency. The average efficiency levels achieved were 79,47% and 86,03% in the traditional flooding irrigation and drip irrigation respectively. In addition, the factors affecting the income of farmers in the traditional flooding irrigation model included household labor, loans, the amount of phosphorus, the amount of potassium, and cost of pesticides and irrigation. Meanwhile, the income of farmers in the drip irrigation model was affected by education, training, costs for post-harvesting and loans.","PeriodicalId":21692,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Tra Vinh University","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Tra Vinh University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35382/18594816.1.27.2017.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to compare the technical efficiency between two irrigation systems: traditional flooding and drip irrigation in watermelon production in Tra Vinh province, thereby recommending a more efficient farming model. This paper uses descriptive statistics, SFA and multivariable regression based on primary datacollected from 160 farmers applying these two irrigation models in Cau Ngang and Duyen Hai districts. The study found that the cost of plant variety, the amount of phosphorus, costs for post-harvesting, labor and irrigation affected the productivity of watermelon in the traditional flooding irrigation model; whereas the amount of potassium, the amount of phosphorus and cost of plant variety were factors affecting the productivity of watermelon in the drip irrigation model. Theresults also showed that producers applying the drip irrigation model achieved higher technical efficiency. The average efficiency levels achieved were 79,47% and 86,03% in the traditional flooding irrigation and drip irrigation respectively. In addition, the factors affecting the income of farmers in the traditional flooding irrigation model included household labor, loans, the amount of phosphorus, the amount of potassium, and cost of pesticides and irrigation. Meanwhile, the income of farmers in the drip irrigation model was affected by education, training, costs for post-harvesting and loans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越越省西瓜生产中传统水灌与滴灌技术效率的比较
本文旨在比较两种灌溉系统的技术效率:传统的洪水灌溉和滴灌在特拉荣省西瓜生产中,从而推荐一种更有效的耕作模式。本文采用描述性统计、SFA和多变量回归等方法,对采用这两种灌溉模式的160名农民的原始数据进行了分析。研究发现,在传统的漫灌模式下,植株品种成本、磷用量成本、采后成本、人工成本和灌溉成本影响西瓜的生产力;而钾、磷用量和品种成本是影响滴灌西瓜产量的主要因素。结果还表明,采用滴灌模式的农户取得了较高的技术效率。传统漫灌和滴灌的平均效率分别为79、47%和86、03%。此外,在传统的漫灌模式下,影响农民收入的因素还包括家庭劳动力、贷款、磷用量、钾用量、农药和灌溉成本。同时,滴灌模式下农民的收入受到教育、培训、收获后成本和贷款的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STUDY ON THE QUALITY PARAMETERS OF POND APPLE JAM (Annona glabra L.) FACTORS AFFECTING THE QUALITY OF WOOD APPLE LIQUOR (Limonia acidissima L.) STUDENT’S EVALUATION ON FACTORS INFLUENCING DECISIONS OF MAJORING IN HOTEL MANAGEMENT AT KIEN GIANG COLLEGE EFFECTS OF EXTRACTS FROM LEAVES AND ROOTS OF Melaleuca cajuputi Powell ON NEMATODES CAUSING DISEASES ON Piper nigrum L. (BLACK PEPPER) IN VITRO BANH PHCHUMBÂN, SEN ĐÔNTA FESTIVAL OF VIETNAM SOUTHERN KHMER: TRADITIONS AND MODERN CHANGES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1