Comparison of Biophysical Profile Score with Fetal Doppler Ultrasound in Patients with Pre-eclampsia at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya

Mbarak Nuru, Abuya Joseph, Kaaria Alice
{"title":"Comparison of Biophysical Profile Score with Fetal Doppler Ultrasound in Patients with Pre-eclampsia at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya","authors":"Mbarak Nuru, Abuya Joseph, Kaaria Alice","doi":"10.31254/jsir.2020.9106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pre-eclampsia is a major direct cause of maternal mortality second only to hemorrhage with 50,000-60,000 pre-eclampsia related deaths worldwide annually. Pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia require close fetal surveillance to guide management and improve outcomes. Poor Biophysical profile scores are associated with poor perinatal outcomes. Recent research has however shown that Doppler flow changes occur much earlier and can be used to time delivery with better perinatal outcomes. Objective: To compare Doppler indices of the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries with biophysical profile scores in the prediction of perinatal outcomes in patients with pre-eclampsia. Methods: This was a cross sectional study. Patients with preeclampsia above 28 weeks gestation were consecutively sampled, questionnaires administered, ultrasound done, followed up to delivery and outcomes documented. Statistical analysis was done using STATA/MP version 13.0. Results: One hundred and sixty-five patients whose ages ranged from 15-42 years with an average of 29 years were studied. Majority (72.7%) presented between 28-34 weeks and 66.06% had pre-eclampsia with severe features. An abnormal outcome was seen in 86.4% of those who had abnormal Biophysical Profile (BPP) scores and abnormal BPP increased the Odds of poor outcome 4.95 times (p<0.001). An abnormal outcome was seen in 80% of those who had abnormal Doppler findings and abnormal Doppler findings increased the Odds of poor perinatal outcome 11.5 times (p<0.001). Conclusion: Abnormal BPP and Doppler findings were significantly associated with poor perinatal outcomes with Doppler being a better predictor","PeriodicalId":17221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31254/jsir.2020.9106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pre-eclampsia is a major direct cause of maternal mortality second only to hemorrhage with 50,000-60,000 pre-eclampsia related deaths worldwide annually. Pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia require close fetal surveillance to guide management and improve outcomes. Poor Biophysical profile scores are associated with poor perinatal outcomes. Recent research has however shown that Doppler flow changes occur much earlier and can be used to time delivery with better perinatal outcomes. Objective: To compare Doppler indices of the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries with biophysical profile scores in the prediction of perinatal outcomes in patients with pre-eclampsia. Methods: This was a cross sectional study. Patients with preeclampsia above 28 weeks gestation were consecutively sampled, questionnaires administered, ultrasound done, followed up to delivery and outcomes documented. Statistical analysis was done using STATA/MP version 13.0. Results: One hundred and sixty-five patients whose ages ranged from 15-42 years with an average of 29 years were studied. Majority (72.7%) presented between 28-34 weeks and 66.06% had pre-eclampsia with severe features. An abnormal outcome was seen in 86.4% of those who had abnormal Biophysical Profile (BPP) scores and abnormal BPP increased the Odds of poor outcome 4.95 times (p<0.001). An abnormal outcome was seen in 80% of those who had abnormal Doppler findings and abnormal Doppler findings increased the Odds of poor perinatal outcome 11.5 times (p<0.001). Conclusion: Abnormal BPP and Doppler findings were significantly associated with poor perinatal outcomes with Doppler being a better predictor
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚Moi教学与转诊医院胎儿多普勒超声对先兆子痫患者生物物理特征评分的比较
背景:子痫前期是孕产妇死亡的主要直接原因,仅次于出血,全世界每年有50,000-60,000例子痫前期相关死亡。妊娠合并先兆子痫需要密切的胎儿监测,以指导管理和改善结果。较差的生物物理特征评分与较差的围产期结局相关。然而,最近的研究表明,多普勒血流变化发生得更早,可以用来确定分娩时间,围产期结局更好。目的:比较脐部和大脑中动脉多普勒指数与生物物理谱评分对子痫前期围产儿预后的预测价值。方法:采用横断面研究。对妊娠28周以上的先兆子痫患者进行连续抽样,进行问卷调查,超声检查,随访至分娩并记录结果。统计分析使用STATA/MP version 13.0进行。结果:共纳入165例患者,年龄15 ~ 42岁,平均29岁。大多数(72.7%)出现在28-34周之间,66.06%为重度先兆子痫。生物物理特征(BPP)评分异常者出现异常结局的比例为86.4%,BPP评分异常使不良结局的发生率增加4.95倍(p<0.001)。有异常多普勒检查结果的患者中有80%出现异常结局,异常多普勒检查结果使围产儿预后不良的几率增加11.5倍(p<0.001)。结论:异常的BPP和多普勒检查结果与围产儿预后不良显著相关,多普勒是一个更好的预测指标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antidiabetic properties of Tarchonanthus camphoratus in fructose-induced diabetic Wistar rats Ovulation Inducing Activity in PCOD Induced Female Wister Albino Rats and In vitro Studies of Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Kadugurogini chooranam (Picrorhiza scrophulariiflora) Antiinflammatory effect of Cissus quadragularis in asthma induced by ovalbumin in mice A Complete Survey on Common Spatial Pattern Techniques in Motor Imagery BCI Evaluation of Effects of Spirulina Extracts on Immunologic Dysfunction and Inflammation Associated with Aflatoxin B1 Induced Toxicity in Mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1