Co-operative Development, Policy, and Power in a Period of Contested Neoliberalism: The Case of Evergreen Co-operative Corporation in Cleveland, Ohio

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Socialist Studies Pub Date : 2017-05-29 DOI:10.18740/S4M628
J. Rowe, A. Peredo, Megan Sullivan, John Restakis
{"title":"Co-operative Development, Policy, and Power in a Period of Contested Neoliberalism: The Case of Evergreen Co-operative Corporation in Cleveland, Ohio","authors":"J. Rowe, A. Peredo, Megan Sullivan, John Restakis","doi":"10.18740/S4M628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excerpt from Conclusion: \nEvergreen and its leaders have played a key role heightening the co-operative movements ambitions for growth and power in North America.There are efforts afoot to replicate Evergreen and experiment with related models, such as a new “union Co-op” model which allows for co-op developers to benefit from the expertise and capital of unions. Future research should track these cases of co-operative development, as insight into the successes and challenges of these initiatives can help facilitate sectoral growth. \nEvergreen’s leaders are well aware of the challenges they face expanding the network in Cleveland and sparking copycat co-ops across the continent. The Democracy Collaborative hopes that publicity around the Evergreen story will increase popular interest in co-operatives and ultimately grow the sector. Stabilizing the system in Cleveland is a crucial part of this movement-building effort, as is managing expectations around replicating the model. \nOur argument is that replicating the “Cleveland Model” will be challenging given the serendipity that allowed for Evergreen’s emergence (the two central contingencies being backing from the Cleveland Foundation and the City). This said, the period of “contested neoliberalism” has increased popular and elite interest in economic alternatives. Evergreen benefitted from growing fatigue with neoliberal economic development in Cleveland, and co-op developers in other regions may find similar openings. Evergreen’s growth locally and ability to become a replicable model nationally faces significant challenges. Its efforts towards scalability and replicability, however, along with the Democracy Collaborative’s larger effort to build popular power for systemic change, are precisely what the US co-operative movement needs to become a stronger political force, one capable of winning legislative change. Ambitious co-operative development initiatives like Evergreen, coupled with self-conscious efforts to strengthen the political power of the co-operative movement, are needed to make the co-operative economy a viable alternative to neoliberal capitalism.","PeriodicalId":29667,"journal":{"name":"Socialist Studies","volume":"54 1","pages":"54-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18740/S4M628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Excerpt from Conclusion: Evergreen and its leaders have played a key role heightening the co-operative movements ambitions for growth and power in North America.There are efforts afoot to replicate Evergreen and experiment with related models, such as a new “union Co-op” model which allows for co-op developers to benefit from the expertise and capital of unions. Future research should track these cases of co-operative development, as insight into the successes and challenges of these initiatives can help facilitate sectoral growth. Evergreen’s leaders are well aware of the challenges they face expanding the network in Cleveland and sparking copycat co-ops across the continent. The Democracy Collaborative hopes that publicity around the Evergreen story will increase popular interest in co-operatives and ultimately grow the sector. Stabilizing the system in Cleveland is a crucial part of this movement-building effort, as is managing expectations around replicating the model. Our argument is that replicating the “Cleveland Model” will be challenging given the serendipity that allowed for Evergreen’s emergence (the two central contingencies being backing from the Cleveland Foundation and the City). This said, the period of “contested neoliberalism” has increased popular and elite interest in economic alternatives. Evergreen benefitted from growing fatigue with neoliberal economic development in Cleveland, and co-op developers in other regions may find similar openings. Evergreen’s growth locally and ability to become a replicable model nationally faces significant challenges. Its efforts towards scalability and replicability, however, along with the Democracy Collaborative’s larger effort to build popular power for systemic change, are precisely what the US co-operative movement needs to become a stronger political force, one capable of winning legislative change. Ambitious co-operative development initiatives like Evergreen, coupled with self-conscious efforts to strengthen the political power of the co-operative movement, are needed to make the co-operative economy a viable alternative to neoliberal capitalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一个有争议的新自由主义时期,合作社的发展、政策和权力:以俄亥俄州克利夫兰的常青合作社公司为例
摘自结语:长荣和它的领导人发挥了关键作用,加强合作运动的野心,在北美的增长和权力。一些公司正在努力复制Evergreen,并尝试相关模式,比如一种新的“联合合作社”模式,允许合作社开发商从工会的专业知识和资本中获益。未来的研究应该追踪这些合作发展的案例,因为深入了解这些举措的成功和挑战有助于促进行业增长。长荣的领导人非常清楚,他们在克利夫兰扩大网络、在整个欧洲大陆引发效仿合作社的挑战。民主合作组织希望,围绕长荣故事的宣传将增加公众对合作社的兴趣,并最终推动该行业的发展。稳定克利夫兰的系统是这一运动建设努力的关键部分,就像管理对复制该模式的期望一样。我们的观点是,复制“克利夫兰模式”将是具有挑战性的,因为常青的出现是偶然的(这两个主要的偶然事件得到了克利夫兰基金会和伦敦金融城的支持)。也就是说,“有争议的新自由主义”时期增加了大众和精英对经济选择的兴趣。由于克利夫兰的新自由主义经济发展日益让人感到厌倦,长荣地产从中受益,其他地区的合作公寓开发商可能也会找到类似的机会。长荣在当地的增长以及在全国范围内成为可复制模式的能力面临着重大挑战。然而,它在可扩展性和可复制性方面的努力,以及民主合作组织为系统性变革建立民众力量的更大努力,正是美国合作社运动成为一股更强大的政治力量所需要的,一股能够赢得立法变革的力量。要使合作经济成为新自由主义资本主义的可行替代方案,就需要像长荣这样雄心勃勃的合作发展倡议,加上自觉加强合作运动政治力量的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auntie Dialogues Reflections on the Struggle Against the Free Trade Agreement (FTA), Three Decades On Canada's National Questions, Free Trade and the Left Reflections on the Struggle Against the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (TFA), 30 Years Later C.B. Macpherson on Marxism and the Eighties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1